Advanced Search Results
Nirma and ors. Vs. the State
Himachal Pradesh
Jul-01-1953
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Section 526 and 526(1)
AIR1953HP126
K.C. Pandit, Adv.
ORDERChowdhry, J.C.1. This is an application by three men, Nirma, Jango and Phurkhu, under Section 526, Cr. P. Code, for the transfer of a case pending against them for an offence under Section 435, I. P....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDaulat Ram Vs. Sukhi
Delhi
Nov-18-1969
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 488(3)
6(1970)DLT393
K.C. Pandit and; B. Sita Ram, Advs
Prakash Naraia, J.(1) Ln proceedings under Section 483 Criminal Procedure Code, initiated by Smt. Sukhi against her husband Daulat Ram, the latter had been ordered to pay a monthly allowance as maintenance to his wife at...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAmar Nath Vs. Alfa
Delhi
Apr-22-1968
CriminalFood Adulteration
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 123, 397, 397(1), 411 and 457; Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 16(1); Reformatory Schools Act, 1897 - Sections 32; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (Amendment) Act, 1955; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 401
AIR1969Delhi133; 1969CriLJ598; 4(1968)DLT473
K.C. Pandit, Adv
ORDER1. The respondent in this case, Alfa by name, was tried separately in two cases under section 16(1)(a)(i) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954. Against him complaints were filed by a Food Inspector for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
State Vs. Mehar Chand
Delhi
Jun-14-1967
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 167
5(1969)DLT179
K.C. Pandit and; H.S. Thakur, Advs
Hardayal Hardy, J. (1) This reference by The Sessions Judge, Mahasu Sessions Division raises an interesting question of law and arises in the following circumstances :- Respondent Mehar Chand was arrested by the Delhi police for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGolo Vs. Union of India
Delhi
Jun-26-1967
Criminal
Lunacy Act, 1912 - Sections 13
3(1967)DLT506
Chabildas and; K.C. Pandit, Advs
Dua, J.(1) These four cases (Climinal Miscellaneous Petitions Nos. 48 and 49 and 51 and 52 of 1967) are the remnants of a bunch of five cases which were registered in this Court inconsequence of my...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDhani Devi Vs. Tulsi Ram
Delhi
Jul-24-1967
Constitution
Himachal Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1952 - Sections 57; Execution of Panchayat Rules - Rule 165
5(1969)DLT293
Sant Ram and; K.C. Pandit, Advs
S.N. Andley, J. (1) This writ petition was initially filed by the petitioner invoking buth Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India for quashing the order dated 22nd November, 1966. passed by the Sub-Divisional...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCollector Land Acquisition Vs. Bhadia
Delhi
Aug-08-1967
Property
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 23; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 11
3(1967)DLT562
K.C. Pandit and; Bhagat Ram, Advs
I.D. Dua, C.J. (1) This appeal, which is directed against the award given hy the learned Additional District Judge, Mandi on 30th June, 1966 on a reference made under section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSanam Ram and anr. Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
Himachal Pradesh
Oct-01-1955
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Section 345
AIR1956HP20,1956CriLJ534
K.C. Pandit, Adv.
ORDERRamabhadran, J.C. 1. The petitioners, along with three others, were prosecuted in the Court of the Magistrate first class, Rohru, of offences under Sections 302 and 323, read with Section 147, I. P. C. The learned...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHari Dass Vs. Babu Ram
Himachal Pradesh
Jul-27-1953
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 115
AIR1954HP16
K.C. Pandit, Adv.
ORDERChowdhry, J.C.1. I have heard Sri K. C. Pandit Advocate, learned counsel for the defendant-petitioner, but see no reason to admit this revision. His argument is that the onus of proof with regard to issue No....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRamdatt Vs. Paras Ram and ors.
Himachal Pradesh
Aug-03-1953
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 115; ;Himachal Pradesh (Courts) Order, 1948
AIR1954HP29
K.C. Pandit, Adv.
ORDERChowdhry, J.C.1. This is a plaintiffs application in revision against the judgment and decree of the learned District Judge of Mahasu and Sir-mur dated 21-4-1952 whereby the decision of the trial Court dismissing the suit was...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›
- Last »