Advanced Search Results

Supreme Court Bar Assoc. M.S.C. Vs. Central Registrar of Coope. Soc

Court : Delhi

Subject : Trusts and SocietiesArbitration

Acts : Multi State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002 - Sections 84 and 84(1); Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 17; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 11

Reported in : 134(2006)DLT21

Advocate for Appellant : R.K. Anand,; A.S. Chandhiok, Sr. Advs.,; K.C. Bajaj,;

Hima Kohli, J.1. The present writ petition has been filed by the Supreme Court Bar Association Multi State Co-operative Group Housing Society Ltd. (in short referred to as `the Society),through Mr. K.C. Bajaj, impugning inter alias...

Constable Davinder Singh and Others Vs. State of Haryana and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ConstitutionService

Reported in : 1996IAD(SC)636; AIR1996SC1050; JT1995(9)SC476; 1996LabIC933; 1996(1)SCALE121; (1996)7SCC153; [1995]Supp6SCR786

Advocate for Appellant : P.P. Rao,; Raj Kr. Gupta,; H.P. Sharma and;

1. Leave granted.2. This appeal by special leave arises from the common order passed by the High Court of Punjab & haryana on 30th May, 1994 in CWO No. 4635/95 and batch.3. In view of the...

State of Haryana Vs. Rajinder Singh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 302, 304B and 498A; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 113B

Reported in : 1996IIAD(SC)298; AIR1996SC2978; 1996(1)ALD(Cri)348; 1996CriLJ1875; 1996(1)Crimes153(SC); JT1996(3)SC396; 1996(4)KarLJ460; 1996(2)SCALE488; (1996)8SCC77

ORDERB.L. Hansaria, J.1. The State has felt aggrieved at the acquittal of the respondent by the High court on appeal being preferred to it by him against the judgment of the Sessions Judge by which he...

Sh. K.C. Bajaj and ors. Vs. Smt. Sudershan Kumari and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 2, 59, 63 and 276; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 68

Reported in : 149(2008)DLT694

Advocate for Appellant : Prashant Bushan and; Mayank Mishra, Advs

Pradeep Nandrajog, J.1. The dispute in the above captioned appeal is between the family members/legal heirs of Late Smt. Krishna Devi Ahuja (hereinafter referred to as the testatrix).2. The genealogy tree of the family of Late...

Avtar Singh Narula S/O S. Sajjan Singh and Surinder Singh Manchanda S/ ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Property

Acts : Contract Act - Sections 20; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 13 and 17; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 7, Rule 11

Reported in : AIR2008Delhi177; 150(2008)DLT760; 2008(104)DRJ671

Advocate for Appellant : D.R. Bhatia, Adv

Manmohan Singh, J.1. This is an appeal preferred by the appellants (Defendants in CS(OS) No1890/2006) against the order of the learned Single Judge dated 25th March, 2008 dismissing the application filed by the appellants being is...

Lalit Bhola Vs. Nidhi Bhola and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. P.K. Shukla, Mr. Puneet Maheshwari

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:30. t January, 2013 Pronounced on:12. h February, 2013 + Crl.M.C.75/2012 LALIT BHOLA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr.K.C. Bajaj with Mr. P.K. Shukla, Advocates Versus NIDHI...

Mr. Neeraj Sharma Vs. Mr. Rakesh Kumar Sharma

Court : Delhi

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 6, Rule 17

Reported in : AIR2005Delhi345; 2005(82)DRJ189

Advocate for Appellant : Sanjiv Khanna, Adv

Pradeep Nandrajog, J.1. Case pleaded by the plaintiff who is the widow of late Gopal Krishan Vohra is that property No.B-1/32, Malviya Nagar, New Delhi was leased in perpetuity to Mrs. Ved Gorwara by the L...

Nidhi Bhola and anr. Vs. Lalit Bhola

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Puneet Maheshwari

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:30. t January, 2013 Pronounced on:12. h February, 2013 + Crl.M.C.2227/2012 NIDHI BHOLA & ANR. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Puneet Maheshwari, Advocate Versus LALIT BHOLA...

Nippy Jewellers Vs. Ashok Kumar Nabhewala

Court : National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

Subject : MRTP

Suresh Chandra, Member: 1. Challenge in this revision petition is to the order dated 20.9.2006 passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, U.T., Chandigarh (State Commission for short) by which the State Commission allowed the...

Bharosi and ors. Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 147, 148, 149 and 302

Reported in : AIR2002SC3299; 2003(1)ALT(Cri)67; 2002CriLJ4322; JT2002(7)SC25; 2003(1)MPHT286; 2002(6)SCALE347; (2002)7SCC239

Advocate for Appellant : H.L. Agrawal, Sr. Adv.,; Lakhan Singh,; K.C. Bajaj and;

Shivraj V. Patil J.1. The appellants were tried for offences under Sections 147, 148, and 302 IPC on the allegations that about four months prior to the incident, some quarrel had taken place between the deceased...