Advanced Search Results

In Re: Mr. Hayles, Editor of The Mail and anr.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 215 and 227; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 7; High Courts Act, 1861 - Sections 15; Industrial Disputes (Appellate Tribunal) Act, 1950 - Sections 30 and 30(1); Contempt of Courts Act, 1962 - Sections 3

Reported in : AIR1955Mad1; 1955CriLJ1

Advocate for Appellant : A.C. Muthanna, Adv. for Hayles, ;K. Bhashyam, ;R. Srinivasan and ;S. Obul Reddi, Advs. for Govind Swaminathan, Adv., ;Adv.-General and ;Public Prosecutor as amucus curiae

Mack J. 1. As Special Industrial Tribunal appointed by the Government of Madras, I adjudicated, while a sitting Judge of this Court, the disputes between the managements and workers of malgamation Ltd. Madras, in their eleven...

In Re: Govinda Reddy and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : CriminalConstitution

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 173, 174, 197, 268, 269, 269(1), 269(4), 286, 289, 340, 340(1), 342, 344, 367, 374 and 540; Constitution of India - Articles 13, 14, 20, 20(3), 22 and 22(1); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 71, 120B, 161, 165, 165A, 302, 307, 380, 392, 394, 397, 457, 459 and 460; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 9, 27, 45, 73, 114 and 133; Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 1952; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 5(2)

Reported in : AIR1958Kant150; AIR1958Mys150; 1958CriLJ1489

Advocate for Appellant : Maheshchander Guru, ;K. Bhashyam and ;C.B. Motaiya, Advs.;G. Channappa, Asst. Adv. General

H. Hombe Gowda, J.1. These two appeals are against the judgment dated the 7th November, 1956 of the Principal Sessions Judge, Bangalore Division, in Bangalore Sessions Case No. 29 of 1956 convicting and sentencing all the...

S.N.T. Kumaraswami Chettiar and ors. Vs. M.S.M. Chinnathambi Chettiar ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : CompanyLimitation

Acts : Companies Act, 1913 - Sections 4; Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 23 - Schedule - Article 62

Reported in : AIR1951Mad291; (1950)2MLJ453

Advocate for Appellant : K. Bhashyam, Adv. for ;T.V. Ramanatha Aiyar, Adv.

Rajamannar, C.J.1. This second appeal has been posted before a Bench, because Govinda Menon J. considered that the points raised in it are of sufficient importance to be heard by a Bench.2. The facts which led...

Sri Lakshmindra theertha Swamiar of Sri Shirur Mutt and anr. Vs. the C ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Trusts and SocietiesConstitution

Acts : Madras Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1951 - Sections 20, 21, 25(4), 26, 28, 29, 30(2), 31, 53, 54, 55(2), 56, 58(3), 59, 63 to 69, 70, 70(2), 70(3), 70(4), 76, 76(1), 78, 89 and 99; Madras Hindu Religious Endowments Act, 1927; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 15, 19, 19(1), 19(5), 25, 26, 27, 204, 226, 245 and 246; ;Madras Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1951 - Sections 1(2); Hindu Law

Reported in : AIR1952Mad613; (1952)IMLJ557

Advocate for Appellant : K. Bhashyam, ;T. Krishna Rao, ;K.R. Karanth, ;S. Venkatakrishna, ;K. Umamaheswaram, ;Alladi Kuppuswami and ;C.V. Srinivasachari, Advs.;Adv. General and ;Government Pleader

1. (C. M. P. No. 2591 of 1951):--This and the other connected petitions relating to the Guruvayur temple and the Chidambaram temple were heard together as they all raised the question of the validity of the...

Karuppu Goundan and ors. Vs. Sellammal and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Hindu Law

Reported in : AIR1959Mad279; (1959)1MLJ173

Advocate for Appellant : K. Bhashyam and ;R. Desikan, Advs.

1. The only question in this appeal against the judgment of Rajagopalan, J., in A. S. No. 126 of 1949 is whether an alienation by a Hindu widow is binding on the reversioners. The properties in...

Tanjore Permanent Bank Ltd. Vs. S.R. Rangachari

Court : Chennai

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 20 and 89

Reported in : AIR1959Mad119

Advocate for Appellant : K. Bhashyam and ;T.R. Srinivasan, Advs.

P.V. Rajamannar, C.J. 1. This is an appeal by the plaintiff in O. S. No. 55 of 1951, in the court of the Subordinate Judge of Madurai and is confined to the portion of the claim...

Marudamuthu Khandar Vs. P.S. Ar. Ar. Arunachalam Chettiar and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : FamilyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 32, Rule 3

Reported in : AIR1957Mad395

Advocate for Appellant : K. Bhashyam and ;R. Desikan, Advs.

1. This is an appeal by one Marudamuthu alias Veerappa Kandar, the plaintiff in O. S. No. 108 of 1948, on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Salem, against the Judgment and decree dismissing his suit...

P. Thambiran Padayachi and ors. Vs. the State of Madras Represented by ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : PropertyConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 19(1) and 31(2); Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 6 and 17; Madras Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1948; Madras Co-operative Societies Act, 1932

Reported in : AIR1952Mad756; (1952)2MLJ208

Advocate for Appellant : R. Kesava Aiyangar, ;L.V. Krishnaswami Aiyar and ;K. Rajah Aiyar, Advs. for ;V. Ramaswami Aiyar, ;T.A. Ramaswami Reddi, ;K. Bhashyam, ;S. Ramayya Nayak, ;M. Natesan and ;M.K. Nambiar, Advs.

1. These are petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the validity of various notifications issued by the State of Madras under Section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, I of 1894,...

Raju's Cafe and Ors. Vs. the Industrial Tribunal and Anr.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10(1)

Reported in : AIR1951Mad865; (1951)ILLJ219Mad; (1951)1MLJ236

Advocate for Appellant : K. Bhashyam and ;T.R. Srinivasan, Advs.

Rajamannar, C.J.1. On 9-4-1948, the Govt. of Madras by G. O. No. 1791 Development, made a reference under Section 10(1)(c), Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, to the Industrial Tribunal having its place of sitting at Coimbatore, of...

Vaithilinga Aiyaswami Aiyar Vs. the District Board of Tanjore Represen ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR1930Mad43; 121Ind.Cas.601; (1929)57MLJ510

ORDERAnantakrishna Aiyar, J.1. The question that has been referred to me is, what is the amount of Court-fee payable in respect of a Memorandum of Second Appeal preferred by a ryot in a suit filed by...