Advanced Search Results
Sukhram Vs. Baldeodas Manilal
Madhya Pradesh
Jan-25-1957
Commercial
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100 to 101 - Order 6, Rule 2 - Order 20, Rule 4 - Order 41, Rule 1; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 30
AIR1957MP138
K.B. Saxena, Adv.
Samvatsar, J.1. This appeal is filed by the defendant against the decree passed by the District Judge, Ujjain.2. The plaintiff firm Messrs. Baldeodas Manilal and Co., filed a suit against the defendant for recovering a sum...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMohanlal Jagannath Vs. Tejsingh Thakur Kanyalal and anr.
Madhya Pradesh
Apr-16-1957
Civil
Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 5; Madhya Bharat Civil Courts Act, 1949 - Sections 23
AIR1958MP96
K.B. Saxena, Adv.
Dixit, J.1. This is an application for leave to appeal as a pauper from a judgment and decree pronounced by the Civil Judge, First Class, Ujjain, in Civil Suit No. 105 of 1951, on 14th May...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskT. Chakkalackal Vs. State of Bihar and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Jan-09-1992
Labour and Industrial
Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act, 1976 - Sections 2, 6 and 9
JT1992(1)SC106; 1993Supp(4)SCC211
ORDERA.M. Ahmadi, J.1. In the present proceedings which were commenced some time in June, 1985 a Vigilance Committee was appointed in October, 1985, and thereafter orders were made from time to time. We do not consider...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Chhotubhai Chhikabhai Patel Poa Roshanbhai C. Patel Vs. Special Land A ...
Gujarat
Nov-25-1999
CivilProperty
(2000)2GLR359
K.K. Trivedi, Adv.
1. The petitioners in this case challenges the land acquisition proceedings in respect of lands situated in subdistrict Choryasi of district Surat which were commenced by issuing separate notification in respect of lands of the petitioners...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPraveen Saxena Vs. Life Insurance Corporation of India and Others
Madhya Pradesh
Aug-20-2014
Land Acquisition
Shri. Abhishek Bhadoriya
1. This is the second visit of the petitioner to this Court. The petitioner by filing this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution has challenged the legality, validity and propriety of the order dated 5th...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›