Advanced Search Results
Sansar Chand Mela Ram Vs. Sham Lal Dhanpat Rai and anr.
Punjab and Haryana
May-01-1957
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 47, 144 and 151 - Order 6, Rule 2
AIR1957P& H307
K.C. Nayar, Adv.
Chopra, J.1. The only point involved in this second execution appeal is with respect to the application of Section 47 Civil Procedure Code.2. In a partition suit, Sansar Chand appellant and Jawahar Lal obtained a joint...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChirukandan and ors. Vs. Superintendent, Central Excise and ors.
Kerala
Aug-02-1983
Excise
Copra Cess Act, 1979 - Sections 2, 3 and 3(1); (The Indian) Coconut Committee Act, 1944 - Sections 3; Produce Cess Act, 1966; Government of India Act, 1935; Sea Customs Act - Sections 20(2); Coconut Development Board Act, 1979 - Sections 4; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 13, 14 to 17 and 19; Produce Cess Act, 1966 - Sections 15; Constitution of India - Articles 143(1), 189(1), 285, 289 and 289(1)
1984(15)ELT7(Ker)
K.A. Nayar,; Menon,; Pai,;
Kochu Thommen, J.1. A common question arises in all these cases, and that is the only point urged before us at the bar on behalf of the petitioners. It is alleged that the Copra Cess Act,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskA.V. Thomas and Co. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Kerala
Jan-28-1986
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 14, 37, 40 and 104 to 109; Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964 - Sections 15
[1986]159ITR431(Ker)
K.A. Nayar and; P. Balachandran, Advs.
Kochu Thommen, J.1. The following question has been, at the instance of the assessee, referred to us by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Cochin Bench ' Whether Rs. 76,777 being the surtax liability is to be allowed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Jagir Singh Vs. Dheru and ors.
Punjab and Haryana
Mar-04-1958
Limitation
Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 2 - Schedule - Articles 89 and 120; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections
AIR1958P& H487
K.C. Nayar and; Harkishanlal Jandal, Advs.
G.L. Chopra, J.1. The only point involved in this Letters Patent Appeal is one of limitation. The facts which are not disputed before us are these:2. Jagir Singh appellant appointed one Nathn his 'mukhtar-i-am' (general attorney),...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPremier Tyres Ltd. Vs. Assistant Collector and ors.
Kerala
Nov-30-1979
Customs
Customs Act, 1972 - Sections 75, 75(1) and 75(2); Central Excise Act, 1944; Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rule, 1971 - Rules 2 and 3; Customs Act, 1962; Customs Rules; Central Excise Rules
1980(6)ELT161(Ker)
K.V. Shenoy,; K.A. Nayar and; J.B. Koshy, Advs.
ORDERT. Kochu Thommen, J.1. The petitioner is a manufacturer of, among other things, tubes and flaps. In respect of those goods manufactured and exported by them, the petitioner claimed drawback as per the provisions of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTehoo Ram and ors. Vs. Dalip Singh and anr.
Punjab and Haryana
Nov-07-1952
Property
Punjab Pre-emption Act, 1913 - Sections 21A
AIR1953P& H128
K.C. Nayar, Adv.
Harnam Singh, J.1. In order to appreciate the points of law arising in Regular S. A. No. 271 of 1949, the facts of the case may be set out in some detail.2. On 30-1-1947, Trikhu sold...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPappu and anr. Vs. Raja Tile and Match Works
Kerala
Feb-25-1988
Labour and Industrial
(1989)ILLJ14Ker
Shri. Anil
Bhaskaran Nambiar, J.1. The applicability of Section 33C(2) of the industrial Disputes Act to a claim for bonus under the Payment of Bonus Act arises for determination in this appeal.2. The facts are not in dispute....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKerala State Electricity Board Vs. Kurien E. Kalathil
Supreme Court of India
Mar-09-2018
Land Acquisition
A. Raghunath
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REPORTABLE CIVIL APPEAL NOS.3164-3165 OF2017KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD AND ANR. …Appellants Versus KURIEN E. KALATHIL AND ANR. ...Respondents JUDGMENT R. BANUMATHI, J.These appeals have been filed against...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAlankar Construction Company vs 1. Mr. Rajan N Khobrgade
Kerala
Sep-15-2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL FRIDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2023 / 24TH BHADRA, 1945 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT WP(C) 19299/2021 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA PETITIONER/S:...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMr. Karthiyayani and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Kerala
Aug-03-1983
Labour and Industrial
(1984)ILLJ259Ker
Sivaraman Nair, J.1. The question arising for decision in these three appeals is as to whether a teacher is a workman as defined in Section 2(s), Industrial Disputes Act. Khalid, J. in his judgment in O.P....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »