Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: k a nayar · Page 1 of about 218 results (0.034 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 01 1957

Sansar Chand Mela Ram Vs. Sham Lal Dhanpat Rai and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-01-1957

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 47, 144 and 151 - Order 6, Rule 2

Reported in : AIR1957P& H307

Advocate for Appellant : K.C. Nayar, Adv.

Chopra, J.1. The only point involved in this second execution appeal is with respect to the application of Section 47 Civil Procedure Code.2. In a partition suit, Sansar Chand appellant and Jawahar Lal obtained a joint...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 02 1983

Chirukandan and ors. Vs. Superintendent, Central Excise and ors.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Aug-02-1983

Subject : Excise

Acts : Copra Cess Act, 1979 - Sections 2, 3 and 3(1); (The Indian) Coconut Committee Act, 1944 - Sections 3; Produce Cess Act, 1966; Government of India Act, 1935; Sea Customs Act - Sections 20(2); Coconut Development Board Act, 1979 - Sections 4; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 13, 14 to 17 and 19; Produce Cess Act, 1966 - Sections 15; Constitution of India - Articles 143(1), 189(1), 285, 289 and 289(1)

Reported in : 1984(15)ELT7(Ker)

Advocate for Appellant : K.A. Nayar,; Menon,; Pai,;

Kochu Thommen, J.1. A common question arises in all these cases, and that is the only point urged before us at the bar on behalf of the petitioners. It is alleged that the Copra Cess Act,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 28 1986

A.V. Thomas and Co. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jan-28-1986

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 14, 37, 40 and 104 to 109; Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964 - Sections 15

Reported in : [1986]159ITR431(Ker)

Advocate for Appellant : K.A. Nayar and; P. Balachandran, Advs.

Kochu Thommen, J.1. The following question has been, at the instance of the assessee, referred to us by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Cochin Bench ' Whether Rs. 76,777 being the surtax liability is to be allowed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 04 1958

Jagir Singh Vs. Dheru and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-04-1958

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 2 - Schedule - Articles 89 and 120; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections

Reported in : AIR1958P& H487

Advocate for Appellant : K.C. Nayar and; Harkishanlal Jandal, Advs.

G.L. Chopra, J.1. The only point involved in this Letters Patent Appeal is one of limitation. The facts which are not disputed before us are these:2. Jagir Singh appellant appointed one Nathn his 'mukhtar-i-am' (general attorney),...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 30 1979

Premier Tyres Ltd. Vs. Assistant Collector and ors.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Nov-30-1979

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1972 - Sections 75, 75(1) and 75(2); Central Excise Act, 1944; Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rule, 1971 - Rules 2 and 3; Customs Act, 1962; Customs Rules; Central Excise Rules

Reported in : 1980(6)ELT161(Ker)

Advocate for Appellant : K.V. Shenoy,; K.A. Nayar and; J.B. Koshy, Advs.

ORDERT. Kochu Thommen, J.1. The petitioner is a manufacturer of, among other things, tubes and flaps. In respect of those goods manufactured and exported by them, the petitioner claimed drawback as per the provisions of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 07 1952

Tehoo Ram and ors. Vs. Dalip Singh and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Nov-07-1952

Subject : Property

Acts : Punjab Pre-emption Act, 1913 - Sections 21A

Reported in : AIR1953P& H128

Advocate for Appellant : K.C. Nayar, Adv.

Harnam Singh, J.1. In order to appreciate the points of law arising in Regular S. A. No. 271 of 1949, the facts of the case may be set out in some detail.2. On 30-1-1947, Trikhu sold...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 25 1988

Pappu and anr. Vs. Raja Tile and Match Works

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Feb-25-1988

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : (1989)ILLJ14Ker

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Anil

Bhaskaran Nambiar, J.1. The applicability of Section 33C(2) of the industrial Disputes Act to a claim for bonus under the Payment of Bonus Act arises for determination in this appeal.2. The facts are not in dispute....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 09 2018

Kerala State Electricity Board Vs. Kurien E. Kalathil

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-09-2018

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : A. Raghunath

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REPORTABLE CIVIL APPEAL NOS.3164-3165 OF2017KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD AND ANR. …Appellants Versus KURIEN E. KALATHIL AND ANR. ...Respondents JUDGMENT R. BANUMATHI, J.These appeals have been filed against...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 15 2023

Alankar Construction Company vs 1. Mr. Rajan N Khobrgade

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Sep-15-2023

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL FRIDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2023 / 24TH BHADRA, 1945 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT WP(C) 19299/2021 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA PETITIONER/S:...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 03 1983

Mr. Karthiyayani and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Aug-03-1983

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : (1984)ILLJ259Ker

Sivaraman Nair, J.1. The question arising for decision in these three appeals is as to whether a teacher is a workman as defined in Section 2(s), Industrial Disputes Act. Khalid, J. in his judgment in O.P....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial