Advanced Search Results

Const. Hans Raj Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Border Security Force Act - Sections 87, 74, 99, 117, 117(2), 139 and 164(2); ;Border Security Force Rules - Rules 148, 149 , 167 to 169; ;Army Act, 1958 - Sections 116; ;Army Rules - Rules 62, 103 to 133 and 133-161; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 378(3); ;Constitution of India - Articles 33, 136, 226 and 227

Reported in : 2006(87)DRJ108

Advocate for Appellant : D.C. Yadav, Adv

Mukul Mudgal, J.1. With the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the leading writ petitions No. 9427/05 and 4753/02 are taken up for final hearing as all these writ petitions raise a common question...

Lama Transport Co. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Delhi

Subject : ArbitrationLimitation

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 30 and 33; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 9, Rule 13 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2 - Order 47, Rule 1; Limitation Act - Sections 5

Reported in : 2002(2)ARBLR218(Delhi); 97(2002)DLT874; 2002(64)DRJ350

Advocate for Appellant : Bishwajit Bhattacharya and; Sujeet Gupta, Advs

B.N. Chaturvedi, J. 1. Against an award dated 19.7.1988, the applicant/respondent, Union of India, filed its objections under Sections 30 & 33 of the Arbitration Act, 1940, which came up for hearing on 7th of April,...

Amresh Kumar Tripathi Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : For the Applicant: Ms. Jyoti Singh, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Saahila Lamba, Amandeep Joshi, Advocates. For the Respondents: Rajender Khatter, Advocate.

DR. VEENA CHHOTRAY: 1. The applicant is a member of Group ‘A’ Indian Railway Service of Signal Engineers (IRSSE). He is a 1986 batch officer. The applicant is aggrieved at denial of Senior Administrative Grade to...

Mohd. MoIn Khan Vs. New Delhi Municipal Council

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : For the Applicant: Chandra Shekhar, Advocate. For the Respondent: Ms. Jyoti Singh, senior counsel with Ms. Harvinder Oberoi, Advocate.

DR. VEENA CHHOTRAY: 1. The applicant, a regularly appointed Assistant Law Officer under the NDMC since the year 1999, is seeking the benefit of regular pay scale with all consequential benefits for the period 1990 to...

V.K. Verma Vs. Anand Prakash, the Principal Secretary-cum-director (Te ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : For the Petitioner: Ms Jyoti Singh, Sr. Counsel with Sourabh Ahuja, Advocates. For the Contemnors/Respondents: Vijay Pandita, Naresh Kaushik, Advocates.

BY DR. VEENA CHHOTRAY: 1. CP 973/2010 has been filed by the applicant alleging willful disobedience on the part of the respondents in non-compliance of the Tribunal’s order dated 13.8.2010 in the OA No.2753/2009. Further it...

Major Viveky Rai Vs. Uoi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Ranbir Penal Code (IPC) - Section 302; Arms Act - Section 30; Army Act 1950 - Sections 18, 19

Advocate for Appellant : Ms.Jyoti Singh; MR.Amandeep Joshi; Ms.Tinu Bajwa, Advs.

1. On 6th November 2003, petitioners wife, Sarita Rai received gun shot wounds at their matrimonial house around 14:45 hours and expired before she could be shifted to the hospital. Pertaining to the incident information was...

Raj Kumar Jha and Another Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : For the Applicants: Mrs. Jyoti Singh, Senior Advocate with Amandeep Joshi, Advocate. For the Respondents: Rajender Nischal, Advocate.

DR. RAMESH CHandRA PandA, MEMBER (A): 1. Shri Rajkumar Jha and another officer belonging to the DANIPS have joined together in the present OA filed under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 and prayed...

Chhatar Singh Yadav and Others Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi and ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

Advocate for Appellant : For the Applicant: Sunil for C. Hari Shankar, Advocates. For the Respondents: R.K. Jain, R.K. Shukla, Advocates, Ms. Jyoti Singh, Sr. Counsel.

DR. VEENA CHHOTRAY: 1. Both the above RAs seek a review of the Tribunal’s common order dated 3.8.2011 disposing the TA 318/2009 and the OA 1646/2010 along with one other TA. The present order is being...

Arpan Kumar and Others Vs. Union of India and Another

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : For the Applicants: Ms. Jyoti Singh, Sr. Advocate with Yogesh Sharma, Amandeep Joshi, Advocates. For the Respondents: V.S.R. Krishna, Advocate.

V.K. BALI, CHAIRMAN: 1. As usual in all service disputes, so also in this Original Application, pleadings are too voluminous, but the points involved for our adjudication appear to be in a very narrow compass. That...

Shailesh Singh Vs Uoi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Ms.Jyoti Singh, ; Mr.Amandeep Joshi, Advs.

1. Whether the Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?2. To be referred to Reporter or not?3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?ORDER.1. Shailesh Singh, an officer of the...