Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: joseph vellapally · Page 1 of about 191 results (0.089 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 15 1999

V. Sudeer Vs. Bar Council of India and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-15-1999

Subject : Civil

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 2(1), 7, 17(2), 24(3), 34(1) and 49(1)&(2); Bar Council of India Training Rules, 1995 - Rule 9, 15 and 21; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 32 and 145; Government of India Act, 1935; India Stamp Act, 1899; Bar Council of India (Amendment) Act, 1973 - Sections 18 and 21

Reported in : AIR1999SC1167; 1999(2)ALT25(SC); 1999(47)BLJR1578; 1999(2)CTC72; (1999)3GLR2135; JT1999(2)SC141; 1999(2)KLT73(SC); 1999(2)SCALE32; (1999)3SCC176; [1999]1SCR1048; 1999(1)LC7

Advocate for Appellant : V.S. Vaidyanathan, Additional Solicitor General,; Joseph Vellapally, A.C.,;

S.B. Majmudar, J.1. Leave granted in the Special Leave Petitions.2. These Writ Petitions under Article 32 of the Constitution of India as well as the two special leave petitions being S.L.P.(C) Nos. 13755 of 1996 and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 22 2001

Solomon Antony and ors. Etc. Vs. State of Kerala and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-22-2001

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Disposal in Auction Rules - Rule 8; Abkari Act - Sections 17 and 18; Kerala Abkari Shops (Disposal in Auction) Amendment Rules 1993 - Rule 8; Kerala Abkari Shops (Disposal in Auction) Rules 1974

Reported in : AIR2001SC1395; 2001(75)ECC718; JT2001(3)SC100; 2001(2)SCALE177; (2001)3SCC694; [2001]2SCR53

Advocate for Appellant : H.N. Salve, Solicitor General,; Joseph Vellapalli,; P. Krishn

ORDERRajendra Babu, J.1. For the excise year 1992-93 the State had monopoly in the matter of supply of arrack. The privilege of vending the arrack was obtained through a licence and the licensees got their supply...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 16 1996

M/S. Rishi Trade Center, Etc. Vs. Collector of Customs and Others Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-16-1996

Subject : Customs Insurance

Reported in : 1996VIIAD(SC)447; AIR1997SC1786; 1996(87)ELT10(SC); JT1996(8)SC296; 1996(6)SCALE710; (1996)10SCC257

Advocate for Appellant : Sri. Joseph Vellapally

B.P. Jeevan Reddy and K.S. Paripoornan, JJ.1. Delay condoned in S.L.P.(C) No 19051 of 1996 (CC.No. 2966/96). 2. Leave granted in both the appeals. Civil Appeal No. 12036 OF 1996 @ S.L.P. (C) No. 19051 of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 06 2001

Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai Vs. Fisher Rosemount (India) Lt ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-06-2001

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 14(1); Customs Valuation Rules, 1963

Reported in : AIR2002SC96; 2001(78)ECC449; 2001(134)ELT321(SC); JT2001(9)SC446; 2001(8)SCALE89; (2002)9SCC555

Advocate for Appellant : Harish N. Salve, Solicitor General, (NP),; Jai Deep Gupta and;

Santosh Hegde, J. 1. In a dispute pertaining to determination of the valuation of goods imported by the respondent herein from M/s. Roseamount Inc. USA, the Assistant Collector of Customs, Special Valuation Bench, Bombay, held that...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 16 2005

Siddartha Tubes Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise, I ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-16-2005

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 4(1), 4(4) and 35L; ;Excise Law

Reported in : 2005(103)ECC321; 2006(193)ELT6(SC); JT2005(10)SC558; (2005)13SCC559

Advocate for Appellant : J. Vellapally, Sr. Adv.,; Pradeep Aggarwal,; Ragevesh Singh

S.H. Kapadia, J.1. The short question which arises for determination in these civil appeals filed by the assessee under Section 35L(b) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') is - whether...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 05 2004

Naresh Kumar and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-05-2004

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Merchant Shipping Act, 1958 - Sections 80 and 86; Merchant Shipping (STCW) Rules, 1998 - Rules 11 and 15; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19 and 32; ;Merchant Shipping (Amendment) Act, 1986 - Sections 5

Reported in : AIR2004SC2026; JT2004(5)SC394; 2004(4)SCALE214; (2004)4SCC540; 2004(3)SLJ1(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : M.N. Krishnamani,; Venketeswaran and; Joseph Vellapally,

H.K. Sema, J. 1. In all these petitions a common question of facts and law has been raised and as such they are being disposed of by this common judgment. For brevity, we are taking the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 17 1999

Delhi Development Authority Vs. Skipper Construction Co. (P) Ltd. and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-17-1999

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Transfer of Property Act - Sections 55(6) and 73; Transfer of Property (Amendment) Act, 1929; ;Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Article 132; ;Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Articles 62, 129 and 142

Reported in : 2000(1)CTC507; JT1999(10)SC223; (2000)2MLJ64(SC); 1999(7)SCALE559; (2000)10SCC130; [1999]Supp5SCR512

Advocate for Appellant : Mukul Rohtagi, ASG.,; Altaf Ahmad, ASG.,; Joseph Vellapally

M. Jagannadha Rao, J.1. On May 6th, 1996 this Court delivered judgment in Delhi Development Authority v. Skipper Construction Co.(P) Ltd. : AIR1996SC2005 . Thereafter, various other issues regarding the Skipper group of Companies continued to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 11 2006

Reliance Industries Ltd. Vs. Designated Authority and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-11-2006

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Tariff Act, 1975 - Sections 9, 9A, 9A(1), 9A(2), 9A(6), 9B(1), 9B(2) and 9C; Customs Tariff (Second Amendment) Act, 1982; Customs Tariff (Amendment) Act, 1995 - Sections 9A; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 3(1); Customs Act, 1962; Customs Rules; Customs Regulations; Finance Act, 2000 - Sections 9AA and 9A(8); Finance Act 2004 - Sections 9A(8); Customs Tariff (Identification, Assessment and Collection of Anti-Dumping Duty on Dumped Articles and for Determination of Injury) Rules, 1995 - Rules 2, 4, 5(1), 6, 6(2), 6(3), 6(7), 7, 7(2), 7(3), 10, 11, 11(3), 12(2), 15(4), 17, 17(4) and 18(1); Anti Dumping Law

Reported in : 2006(202)ELT23(SC); JT2006(12)SC478; 2006(9)SCALE124; (2006)10SCC368

Advocate for Appellant : Joseph Vellapally, Sr. Adv.,; K.R. Sasiprabhu,; Ashvin Dave

Markandey Katju, J.1. This Appeal has been filed against the impugned final order dated 29.11.2000 passed by the (CEGAT) Customs Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi.2. We have heard learned Counsel for the parties.The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 10 2002

Kanthi Enterprises and ors. Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-10-2002

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 2(1), 5(1A), 18, 18A and 29

Reported in : AIR2002SC3227; JT2002(7)SC19; 2002(6)SCALE321; (2002)7SCC283; [2002]SUPP2SCR209; [2002]128STC182(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : A.K. Ganguli,; Joseph Vellapally and; T.L.V. Iyer, Sr. Ad

Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri, J.1. These appeals are from the common judgment and order of Division Bench of the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore in a batch of writ appeals and writ petitions dated September...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 11 2003

Naturalle Health Products (P) Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise, Hy ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-11-2003

Subject : Excise

Acts : Drugs and Cosmetic Act, 1940 - Sections 2 and 3; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 173B; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35L(B); Cental Excise Tariff Act, 1985

Reported in : 2003(90)ECC505; 2003LC513(SC); 2003(158)ELT257(SC); 2003(9)SCALE542; (2004)9SCC136

Advocate for Appellant : Raju Ramachandran, Additional Solicitor General,; Joseph Vellapally, Sr. Adv.,;

Ar. Lakshmanan, J.1. The points involved in both the appeals are one and the same and, therefore, they were heard together by consent of parties. The issue involved in Civil Appeal No. 2072 of 1996 is:...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial