Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: joseph m madathil · Page 1 of about 4 results (0.084 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 26 1960

idichandi Mathai Vs. Narayanan Unnithan

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Aug-26-1960

Subject : Civil

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 58

Reported in : AIR1962Ker27

Advocate for Appellant : Joseph M. Madathil, Adv.

M. Madhavan Nair, J.1. The 1st defendant is the appellant. The suit is for redemption of an otti and kuzhikanom executed by the predecessor-in-interest of the plaintiff in favour of the predeces-sor-in-interest of the defendants, evidenced...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 12 1956

Manikka Kunjipennu and ors. Vs. Narayanan Parameswara Panicker

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Dec-12-1956

Subject : Property

Acts : Travancore Civil Courts aCt, 1084 - Sections 14; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (CPC0, 1908 - Order 21, Rule 90

Reported in : AIR1957Ker74

Advocate for Appellant : Joseph M. Madathil, Adv.

1. This second appeal arises out of an appellate order of the court below refusing to uphold a court sale of immovable property in favour of plaintiff-decree-holder in execution of a small cause decree against the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 19 1956

Eastern Mercantile Bank Ltd. Vs. Krishna Menon

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Dec-19-1956

Subject : Banking

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 8, Rule 6; Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 3

Reported in : AIR1957Ker100

Advocate for Appellant : Joseph M. Madathil, Adv.

Varadaraja Iyengar, J.1. The claim is on the basis of a pronote. The debtor admits the pronote but says that the claim is barred by limitation. It is apparently so but the Staff Security Ledger shows...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Oct 28 1959

Eastern Mercantile Bank Ltd. Vs. N.T. Philip

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Oct-28-1959

Subject : Civil

Acts : Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 23 and 24

Reported in : AIR1960Ker194

Advocate for Appellant : Joseph M. Madathil, Adv.

P.T. Raman Nayar, J. 1. This is one of those very rarecases where an agreement to stitle prosecution is set out on paper, for, the very mortgage deed onwhich the claim is based, expressly states that...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial