Advanced Search Results
P.A. Lilly Amma Vs. State of Kerala, Represented by Secretary to Gover ...
Kerala
Jun-24-2002
Service
K.E. Act - Sections 11; ;K.E. Rules - Rules 7, 8A and 41
[2003(96)FLR671]
T.S. John and; K. Balachandran, Advs.
M. Ramachandran, J.1. Petitioner has filed this original petition, thoughafter her retirement, challenging Ext. P5 which came into lifeafter her retirement. An application for approval of herappointment as Headmistress in St. Kuriakose U.P. School,Melpadom, which is...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJintu John vs State of Kerala
Kerala
Sep-26-2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. BADHARUDEEN TUESDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2023 / 4TH ASWINA, 1945 BAIL APPL. NO. 6722 OF 2021 CRIME NO.1104/2021 OF MANNAMTHALA POLICE...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAshok Kumar Vs. the State
Delhi
Aug-19-1994
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 374 and 397; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 411
1994IIIAD(Delhi)1309; 1994(3)Crimes732; 55(1994)DLT597; 1994(30)DRJ555
R.M. John and; R.D. Jolly, Advs
Dalveer Bhandari, J. (1) The petitioner has filed this revision petition under section 397 of the Cr.P.C. against the judgment dated 20.12.1979 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge dismissing the petitioner's appeal under section 374 of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Ashok Chhabildas Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Mumbai
Feb-17-2005
CustomsCivil
Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 108, 111, 112 and 124
2005(187)ELT295(Bom)
Y.T. John, Adv., i/b., Anil Balani, Adv.
J.P. Devadhar, J.1. By this petition, the petitioner challenges the order of CEGAT, dated 19-1-2001, wherein while confirming the Order-in-Original dated 11-8-1994, the Tribunal has reduced the personal penalty levied against the petitioner Under Section 112(a)...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRamesh Ghanshamdas Aswani and anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Nov-29-1990
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 239, 362 and 482
1991(3)BomCR246
Y.T. John ;and Dilip G. Bagwe, Advs.
M.F. Saldanha, J.1. Questions of some importance have been raised in this writ petition which I am summarising below :(a) whether in a proceeding instituted on a police complaint where the accused is discharged, the Magistrate...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn the Matter of a Reference by the Governor in Council Concerning Ref ...
Canada Supreme Court
Apr-25-2014
Education
Robert J. Frater, Christopher M. Rupar and Warren J. Newman, for the Attorney General of Canada. Michel Y. Hélie and Josh Hunter, for the intervener the Attorney General of Ontario. Jean Yves Bernard and Jean François Beaupré, for the intervener the Attorney General of Quebec. Edward A. Gores, Q.C., for the intervener the Attorney General of Nova Scotia. Denis Thériault and David D. Eidt, for the intervener the Attorney General of New Brunswick. Heather S. Leonoff, Q.C., and Charles Murray, for the intervener the Attorney General of Manitoba. Nancy E. Brown, for the intervener the Attorney General of British Columbia. D. Spencer Campbell, Q.C., Rosemary S. Scott, Q.C., and Jonathan M. Coady, for the intervener the Attorney General of Prince Edward Island. Graeme G. Mitchell, Q.C., and J. Thomson Irvine, for the intervener the Attorney General for Saskatchewan. Margaret Unsworth, Q.C., Randy Steele and Donald Padget, for the intervener the Attorney General of Alberta. Philip Osborne and Barbara G. Barrowman, for the intervener the Attorney General of Newfoundland and Labrador. Bradley E. Patzer and Anne F. Walker, for the intervener the Attorney General of the Northwest Territories. Norman M. Tarnow and Adrienne E. Silk, for the intervener the Attorney General of Nunavut. The Honourable Serge Joyal, P.C., on his own behalf. Nicholas Peter McHaffie and Paul Beaudry, for the intervener the Honourable Anne C. Cools. Sébastien Grammond, Mark C. Power, Jennifer Klinck and Perri Ravon, for the intervener Fédération des communautés francophones et acadienne du Canada. Serge Rousselle, for the intervener Société de l’Acadie du Nouveau Brunswick Inc. Daniel Jutras, John J. L. Hunter, Q.C., Brent B. Olthuis, Claire E. Hunter and Kate Glover, for the amicus curiae.
The Court ” I. Introduction [1] The Senate is one of Canadas foundational political institutions. It lies at the heart of the agreements that gave birth to the Canadian federation. Yet from its first sittings, voices...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskV. Ramchandra Vs. M.C. Jagadhodhara Gupta and ors.
Andhra Pradesh
Jun-11-1986
Criminal
1986CriLJ1820
Sri. Vada Rajagopala Reddy
ORDERRamaswamy, J.1. The petitioner, an Assistant Public Prosecutor, Gr. II, is assailing the validity of the appointment of the first respondent in the impugned G.O.Ms. No. 112, Law Department, dt. April 13, 1984 as Addl. Public...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJaidhari Roy and ors. Vs. State of Bihar and ors.
Patna
Jul-21-1994
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 24, 24(1), 24(2), 24(3), 24(5), 24(6), 24(7), 24(8), 24(9), 25 and 26(6); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (Amendment) Act, 1978; Advocates Act, 1961; Police Act; Bihar Practice and Procedure Manual Rules - Rule 137; Kerala Government Law Officer (Appointment and Conditions of Service) and Conduct of Cases Rules, 1978 - Rule 5; Bihar Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (Amendment) Act, 1984 - Sections 24(6)
Shyama Prasad Mukherjee, Markandeya Singh and Anil Kumar, Advs.Rajendra Pd. Singh, Sakil Ahmad Khan and Krishna Pd. Singh, Advs. No. 2 and Jitendra Pd. Singh and Ramchandralal Das, Advs.
Bisheshwar Prasad Singh, J.1.Petitioner NO. 1 herein was appointed as a Public Prosecutor of Vaishali district in the year 1990 for a term of three years under Section 24 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Other...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJoseph Vs. Tahsildar, Meenachil
Kerala
Oct-22-1976
Other TaxesConstitution
Kerala Plantations (Additional Tax) Act, 1960 - Sections 3(3), 5(4), 6 and 9(1); Kerala Plantations (Additional Tax) Revision of Assessment Rules, 1965 - Rule 10
AIR1977Ker40; [1978]112ITR410(Ker)
Jimmy John, Adv.
ORDERK.K. Narendran, J.1. The vires of Rule 10 (a) of the Kerala Plantations (Additional Tax) Revision of Assessment Rules, 1965 is questioned in this Original Petition. The petitioner's father who was an assessee to plantation tax...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMr. Jinu P. Philip Vs. Annie Varghese W/O Mr. Jinu P. Philip
Mumbai
May-02-2008
Family
Special Marriage Act, 1954 - Sections 22; Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 9 and 13B; Hindu Law; Constitution of India - Article 142
2008(4)BomCR824; (2008)110BOMLR1660; 2008(4)MhLj866
Y.T. John, Adv.
Ranjana Desai, J.1. Rule. Respondents waive service. By consent of the parties, taken up for hearing forthwith. 2. The appellant is the original respondent-husband and the respondent is the original petitioner-wife in Petition No. A-361 of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »