Advanced Search Results
In Re: Noise Pollution - Implementation of the Laws for Restricting Us ...
Supreme Court of India
Jul-18-2005
ConstitutionEnvironment
Constitution of India - Articles 19, 19(1), 19(1)A, 19(10), 21, 25, 141 and 142; Noise Pollution Control and Regulation Rules, 1999; Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981 - Sections 2; Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 - Sections 2; Noise Abetment Act, 1960 - Sections 2; Control on Pollution Act, 1974; Noise and Statutory Nuisance Act, 1993; Noise Control Act, 1975; Noise Control (Miscellaneous Articles) Regulations, 1995; Noise Control (Motor Vehicles and Motor Vehicle Accessories) Regulations, 1995; Noise Control Ordinance; Noise Pollution (Regulation and Control) Rules, 2000 - Rule 3; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 95, 268, 290 and 291; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 133; Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 89 and 90; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988;
AIR2005SC3136; 2005(3)AWC2685(SC); 2005(5)BomCR553; 121(2005)DLT547(SC); [2005(4)JCR4(SC)]; JT2005(6)SC210; (2005)5SCC733
Raju Ramachandran, Additional Solicitor General (NP),; Jitendra Sharma (AC),;
R.C. Lahoti, C.J.1. These two matters before us raise certain issues of far- reaching implications in day-to-day life of the people in India relatable to noise pollution vis-a-vis right to life enshrined in Article 21 of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVirender Gaur and ors. Vs. State of Haryana and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Nov-24-1994
PropertyCivil
Haryana Municipal Act, 1973 - Sections 61, 66, 203, 205 and 250; Constitution of India - Articles 21, 47, 48A and 51A
1998(1)CTC143; JT1997(10)SC600; (1995)109PLR591; 1994(5)SCALE211; (1995)2SCC577; [1994]Supp6SCR78; 1995(1)LC529(SC)
Jitendra Sharma, Sr. Adv. and; Manoj Swarup, Adv
1. Leave granted.2. The undisputed facts are that the Municipal Committee, Thanesar, District Kurukshetra in Haryana State, framed Town Planning Scheme No. 5. The Government of Haryana had sanctioned that Scheme on October 30,1975. It would...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRajasthan State Road Transport Corpn. and anr. Vs. Shri Krishna Kant a ...
Supreme Court of India
Sep-23-1993
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10; Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act; Road Transport Corporation Act; Constitution of India
JT1993(5)SC454a; (1994)ILLJ136SC; 1993(3)SCALE884
Sushil Kumar Jain and; Jitendra Sharma, Advs
ORDER1. These appeals and the special leave petition have been filed by the Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, hereinafter referred to as 'the Corporation' which is constituted under the provisions of Road Transport Corporations Act, 1950....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Behari Lal and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Aug-28-2000
Motor Vehicles
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 147(2); Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 95(2); Workmen
II(2000)ACC463; 2000ACJ1428; AIR2000SC3053; 2000(5)ALT12(SC); [2000]102CompCas104(SC); (2000)3GLR2396; JT2000(10)SC39; 2000(6)SCALE177; (2000)7SCC137; [2000]Supp2SCR698; 20
Jitendra Sharma, Sr. Adv.,; Parmanand Gaur,; P.N. Jha,;
Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri, J. Leave is granted. This appeal is from the judgment and order of the High Court of Rajasthan at Jaipur dated May 29, 1997 allowing Civil Misc. Appeal No.682 of 1996 filed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRamesh Vs. Rajpati
Punjab and Haryana
Jan-22-2003
Family
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 13 and 20
AIR2003P& H316; I(2004)DMC521; (2003)135PLR761
Jitendra Sharma, Adv.
Viney Mittal, J 1. Rajpati-respondent in the present appeal filed a petition for dissolu-tion of marriage between her and Ramesh (the present appellant). In the petition which was filed by her on September 1, 1999, it...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Industrial Finance Corporation of India Vs. Delhi Administration a ...
Delhi
Jan-29-1973
Intellectual Property Rights
Constitution of India - Article 12
[1973(27)FLR207]; ILR1973Delhi29; 1974LabIC223
F.S. Nariman,; I.N. Shroff,; H.S. Parihar,;
T.V.R. Tatachari, J. (1) This Letters Patent Appeal filed against the judgment of a learned single Judge (V.S. Deshpande, J.) of this Court, dated March 21, 1972, dismissing Civil Writ Petition No. 1060 of 1971, came...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAshok Chandra Aggarwala Vs. Delhi Administrative and ors.
Delhi
Dec-19-1984
Trusts and Societies
Delhi Cooperative Societies Act, 1972 - Sections 26
ILR1985Delhi796; 1985RLR432
Harjinder Singh and; Jitendra Sharma, Advs
Charanjit Talwar, J. (1) The petitioner, Shri Ashok Chandra Aggarwala, seeks issuance of a writ of mandamus to the Delhi Administration to substitute his name in place of the name of his late father in the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNational Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. M/S. Swaranlata Das and Others
Supreme Court of India
Aug-17-1992
Motor Vehicles
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 166(3)
1993ACJ748; AIR1993SC1259; (1993)104PLR309; 1993Supp(2)SCC743
Jitendra Sharma, Adv
ORDER1. This petition for grant of special leave is directed against the judgment and order dated 28th January, 1992 of the High Court of Gauhati, Agartala Bench enhancing in appeal the compensation in a fatal accident's...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDes Raj and ors Vs. State of Punjab and ors
Supreme Court of India
Apr-20-1988
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2
AIR1988SC1182; JT1988(2)SC145; 1988LabIC1713; (1988)IILLJ149SC; 1988(1)SCALE771; (1988)2SCC537; [1988]3SCR616; 1989(1)SLJ17(SC); 1988(2)LC40(SC)
Jitendra Sharma,; P. Gaur,; D.K. Garg,;
Ranganath Misra, J.1. Each of these appeals is by special leave and is directed against the Award made in different disputes by the Labour Court. The common justification for ignoring the High Court and approaching this...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskOm Prakash Saxena Vs. Tapeshwari Prasad and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Aug-06-1980
Tenancy
AIR1981SC174b; (1981)1SCC430; 1980(12)LC816(SC)
V.R. Krishna Iyrr, J.1. Having heard Mr. Jitendra Sharma far the appellant we are satisfied that on the submission which merits consideration is as to the time that we should grant to him for vacating the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »