Advanced Search Results

Surya Nath Singh and ors. Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

Subject : Service

Acts : Police Act

Advocate for Appellant : Bamdeo Pandey and Jitendra Pandey, Advs. in C.W.J.C. No. 11211/03 and Sunil Kumar, Adv. in C.W.J.C. No. 11667/03

Navaniti Prasad Singh, J.1. These two writ petitions are filed by eight people (five in C.W.J.C. No. 11211 of 2003 and three in C.W.J.C. No. 11667 of 2003) who joined the State Police Force as Steno...

Adah Mandal and ors. Vs. State of Bihar

Court : Patna

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 395 and 396

Advocate for Appellant : Raj Kumar, Amicus Curiae, Bamdeo Pandey and Jitendra Pandey, Advs.

1. There are three appellants in Cr. Appeal No. 120/94, namely, Adan Mandal, Mohi Mandal and Basant Mandal. They are all residents of P.S. Sultanganj, district Bhagalpur. There are six appellants in Cr. Appeal No. 139/94....

Sheoji Tiwary Vs. State of Bihar

Court : Patna

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302; Arms Act - Sections 27; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 161

Advocate for Appellant : Bamdeo Pandey and Jitendra Pandey, Advs.

Rekha Kumari, J.1. The sole appellant stands convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and has been sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs. 5000/- and in default,...

Dasrath Mehtar Vs. the State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

Subject : Service

Acts : Bihar Home Guards Act, 1947; Bihar Boards Miscellaneous Rules - Rule 151; Bihar Home Guards Rules, 1953 - Rule 16

Advocate for Appellant : Bamdao Pandey and Jitendra Pandey, Advs.

Barin Ghosh, J.1. In the instant writ petition the Petitioner Dasrath Mehtar, by caste a Scheduled Caste, has come up with a complain that after having had made him to work as a Mehtar, i.e. Sweeper...

Kishore Singh Vs. State Bank of India, Kanpur and Another

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service

Reported in : 1999(3)AWC2620; [2000(85)FLR854]; (1999)3UPLBEC1763

Advocate for Appellant : M.C. Dwivedi and ;Jitendra Pandey, Advs.

D.K. Seth, J.1. Similar question was involved in the case of Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 33231 of 1992, Mukesh Kumar Sharma v. SeniorDivisional Mortager. Life Insurance Corporation of India and another, disposed of by this...

S.P. Roy and Another Vs. State of U. P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Acts : Mineral Concession Rules, 1960 - Rule 51; Uttar Pradesh Minor Minerals (Concession) Rules, 1963 - Rule 70

Reported in : 2000(4)AWC3112

Advocate for Appellant : Jitendra Pandey, Adv.

M. Katju and Onkareshwar Bhatt, JJ. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. The petitioners have challenged the publication notice dated 25.5.1993 and has prayed for a mandamus directing respondents not to interfere in his excavation...

Dwarka Prasad Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 363 and 379; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2002CriLJ1278; RLW2003(1)Raj461; 2002(2)WLC149; 2002(4)WLN386

Advocate for Appellant : Jitendra Pandey, Adv.

Misra, J.1. This habeas corpus petition has been filed by one Dwarka Prasad who came up with a case that her daughter Vedwati Kumari Sharma whose age is stated to be 13 years, has been missing...

Ajit Singh ? Toni Vs. State of Bihar

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Criminal

Criminal Appeal (S.J.) No. 335 of 2000 (R) ----------- Against the judgment of conviction dated 07.08.2000 and order of sentence dated 14.08.2000, passed by the learned VIII Additional Judicial Commissioner, Ranchi in connection with Sessions Trial...

Lalita Devi and Ors Vs. The State of Jharkhand

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Land Acquisition

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B. A. No. 2523 of 2016 1. Lalita Devi 2. Shiya Devi 3. Surendra Pandey 4. Jitendra Pandey @Jitendra Kumar Pandey …… Petitioners Versus The State of...

Jagdish Pandey and ors. Vs. State of Bihar

Court : Patna

Subject : Criminal

M.L. Visa, J.1. Both these appeals have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment because both the appeals are directed against the judgment and order dated 19.8.87 passed by 4th Addl....