Advanced Search Results

Raghu Hari Dalmia and Others Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of Indi ...

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : For the Appellants: Janak Dwarkadas, Senior Advocate with Ankit Lohia, Sharad Vaid, Chakrapani Misra, Ms. Suruchi Rungla, Ms. Meghna Rajadhyaksha, Advocates. For the Respondent: Vikram Nankani, with A

Per: N. K. Sodhi, Presiding Officer 1. The appellants herein are the promoters/members of promoter group of OCL India Ltd., a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 having its registered office in the State of...

M.Ramesh Kumar, Ias (Retd.) Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226, 323A; Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 - Section 36(c), 6(3), (4) (7); Selection Rules - Rule 5(2)(3); Service Rules - Rule 7

Advocate for Appellant : Mr.Janak Dwarkadas; Mr.R.R.Shetty, Advs.

1. Heard Mr.Janak Dwarkadas with Mr.Shetty, the learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr.Ravi Kadam, the learned Advocate General with Mr.Saluja, A.G.P. and Mr.Mihir Desai for respondent No.5. 2. Rule. 3. Respondents waive service. 4. The petition...

Price Waterhouse Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of India Sebi Bhava ...

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Subject : MRTP

Advocate for Appellant : For the Appellant: Janak Dwarkadas, Senior, Navroz Seervai, Senior, Somasekhar Sundaresan, Farhad Sorabjee, Zerick Dastur, Sneha Sheth, Prerna Arora, Advocates. For the Respondent: Ravi Kadam, Advocat

P.K. Malhotra (for self and S.S.N. Moorthy) 1. The short question that arises in these two connected Appeals no. 8 and 9 of 2011 arising out of the same order is whether the appellants are entitled...

Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Limited Vs. Wyeth Holdings Corporation a ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Companies Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 40, Rule 1; Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 2, 11, 12, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 33, 105 and 106; Trade and Merchandise Marks Rules, 1959

Reported in : 2005(30)PTC14(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : Janak Dwarkadas, ;V.R. Dwarkadas and ;V.R. Dhond, Advs., i/b., Shantilal &Co.

Anoop V. Mohta, J.1. Introduction: The controversy in this appeal revolves around the conflict between two identical trade marks, 'Pacitane' registered trade mark of the respondents and 'Parkitane' unregistered trade mark of the appellants.2. The appellants...

K.K. Modi Vs. Securities Appellate Tribunal

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Acts : Securities and Exchange Board of India (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 1997 - Regulations 2(1), 2(2), 6(3), 7(1), 8, 8(2), 10, 11, 11(1), 12, 18(1), 18(2) and 46; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 6; Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 - Sections 15T and 15Z

Reported in : 2002(2)BomCR523; [2003]113CompCas418(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : Janak Dwarkadas and ;M.P.S. Rao, Advs.

B.P. Singh, C.J.1. This appeal has been preferred by Mr. K.K. Modi against the Order of the Tribunal, Mumbai, dated 31-7-2001 under Section 15Z of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 ('the Act')....

Ganjam Trading Co. Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Panther Investrade Ltd. and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 9; Special Court (Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities) Act, 1992 - Sections 3, 3(2), 8, 9A and 9B; Arbitration Act, 1940- Sections 9A(1)

Reported in : 2003(1)BomCR330; [2004]119CompCas766(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : Janak Dwarkadas and ;Z.I. Andhyarunina, Advs. i./b., Crawford Bayley and Co., ;V.R. Dhond and ;C.S. Kapadia, Advs. i/b., A.N. Nasikwala, Adv.

S.A. Bobde, J.1. Heard Mr. Thakkar, learned senior counsel for the inter-vener. Intervention application is allowed.2. The petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, is moved by Ganjam Trading Co. Pvt. Ltd,...

Manoj Gaur Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of India, Mumbai

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : For the Appellant: Janak Dwarkadas, Senior Advocate with P.N. Modi, Anant Upadhyay, Advocates. For the Respondent: Darius Khambatta, Advocate General with Aditya Mehta, Mobin Shaikh, Advocates.

P.K. Malhotra 1. This order will dispose of three Appeals no. 59, 60 and 64 of 2012 which arise out of a common order dated January 5, 2012 passed by the adjudicating officer of the Securities...

Uttar Pradesh Trading Company Limited Vs. Securities and Exchange Boar ...

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : For the Appellant: Janak Dwarkadas, Senior Advocate with Ankit Lohia, Advocate. For the Respondent: Shiraz Rustomjee, Senior Advocate with Mobin Shaikh, Advocate.

Per: P. K. Malhotra, Member 1. The appellant before us is aggrieved by the order dated August 29, 2011 passed by the adjudicating officer of the Securities and Exchange Board of India holding the appellant guilty...

V. K. Kaul Vs. the Adjudicating Officer, Securities and Exchange Board ...

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : For the Appellant: Janak Dwarkadas, Senior Advocate with Chirag Kamdar, Ms. Ipsita Dutta, Rohan Banerjee, Advocates. For the Respondent: D. J. Khambatta, Advocate General with Dr. Poornima Advani, Aja

P. K. Malhotra 1. This order will dispose of two Appeals no. 55 and 56 of 2012 which arise out of orders dated January 4, 2012 passed by the adjudicating officer of the Securities and Exchange...

Volition Investment Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Mrs. Madhuri Jitendra Mashroo and Et ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 54; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 20 and 37; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115

Reported in : AIR2003Bom360; 2003(5)BomCR262

Advocate for Appellant : Janak Dwarkadas, Adv., i/b., ;S. Ashwinikumar & Co.

ORDERR.J. Kochar, J. 1. The plaintiff, a company incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 has filed the present suit for specific performance of the agreement dated 24th July, 2002, alternatively and/or for damages...