Advanced Search Results

Tofan Singh Vs. The State Of Tamil Nadu

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

Advocate for Appellant : PRATIBHA JAIN __ B. KRISHNA PRASAD

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.152 OF2013TOFAN SINGH …Appellant Versus STATE OF TAMIL NADU …Respondent WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1750 OF2009CRIMINAL APPEAL No.2214 OF2009CRIMINAL APPEAL No.827 OF2010CRIMINAL APPEAL No.835 OF2011CRIMINAL...

Radhelal Gupta Vs. State Bar Council of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : CivilConstitution

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 3, 5, 8 and 8A; Madhya Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2000 - Sections 74 and 85

Reported in : AIR2002MP98; 2002(2)MPHT10

Advocate for Appellant : N.C. Jain and ;P.S. Nair, Sr. Advs.

ORDERDipak Misra, J. 1. The pivotal issue that arises for consideration in this writ petition preferred by a learned member of the Bar whether the members of the State Bar Council of Madhya Pradesh are entitled...

Maharishi Mahesh Yogi Vedic Vishwavidyalaya and ors. Vs. State of M.P. ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Maharishi Mahesh Yogi Vedic Viswavidyalaya Adhiniyam, 1995 - Sections 4, 9(2), 31-A(1), 31-A(2), 31-B, 31-C and 37-A; ;Maharishi Mahesh Yogi Vedic Viswavidyalaya (Sanshodhan) Adhiniyam, 2000; ;Constitution of India - Article 14; Madhya Pradesh Vishwavidyalaya Adhiniyam, 1973 - Sections 51 and 52

Reported in : AIR2002MP196; 2002(2)MPHT353

Advocate for Appellant : N.C. Jain and ;Ravindra Shrivastava, Sr. Advs. and ;Kishore Shrivastava and ;Riyush Dharmadhikari, Advs.

Dipak Misra, J. 1. In this writ petition it is imperative to bestow our anxious consideration on the long debate and deliberation that took place consuming quite a speck of time relating to contentious issues which...

M.S. Aggarwal Vs. Dy. Cit

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2004)83TTJ(Del)692

Advocate for Appellant : Anil Jain &; Vinay Garg,;for the assessed; Peeyush Jain,;for the Revenu

ORDERT.N. Chopra, A.M.This appeal is filed by the assessed against the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) dated 2-1-2003 whereby block assessment made by the assessing officer under section 158BC has been upheld.2. The block period involved...

Sanjay @ Kaka Etc. Etc. Vs. the State (Ncc.T. of Delhi)

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B, 302, 392/34, 394, 397, 398, 342 and 411; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25, 27, 54 and 59; Terrorist and Disruption Activities (Prevention) Amendment Act, 1993 - Sections 5; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 24, 25 to 26, 27 and 114

Reported in : AIR2001SC979; 2001(1)ALD(Cri)427; 2001CriLJ1231; JT2001(2)SC461; 2001(1)SCALE695; (2001)3SCC190; [2001]1SCR904

Advocate for Appellant : R.K. Jain,; Sushil Kumar,; Anoop Choudhary, Sr. Advs.,;

Sethi, J. 1. In the broad day light and in the capital city of the country, the appellants and one Mohabat Ali, the four young desperados entered the premises No.F-8/5, Model Town, Part-II, Delhi to commit...

The State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Dr. Ramesh Chandra Dixit

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

..1.. W.A.No.655/2012 & others HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH PRINCIPAL SEAT AT JABALPUR Writ Appeal No.655 of 2012 State of M.P. & another Vs. Dr.Ramesh Chandra Dixit Writ Appeal No.678 of 2012 State of M.P. &...

Satish Jain vs State

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Vivek Sood, Mr. Rachit Batra, Ms. Medhavi Judevi, Mr. Pankhuri Jain, Ms. Sanskruti Tiwari, Mr. Manoj Pant, Mr. Amit Tiwari, Ms. Ayushi Srivastava, Mr. Ayush Tanwar, Mr. Arpan Narwal, Mr. Kushagra Malik, Ms. Smriti Sinha

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 240/2020 & CRL.M.A. 8746/2020 SATISH JAIN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vivek Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rachit Batra, Ms. Medhavi Judevi, Mr. Pankhuri Jain, Ms....

Committee of Management, Prem Lal Singhania Kanya Inter College and an ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Constitution

Reported in : 2002(2)AWC1554; (2002)3UPLBEC2450

Advocate for Appellant : Rahul Jain and ;R.K. Jain, Advs.

R.R. Yadav, J. 1. Heard Sri Raj Kumar Jain, learned counsel for petitioners, learned standing counsel as well as Sri Ashok Khare, learned senior counsel assisted by Sri Shailesh Verma representing respondent No. 4. 2. It...

State of M.P. and Others Vs. Balveer Singh and Others

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1959 - Sections 2(1), 57, 57(1), 57(2), 57(3), 111, 158(3), 165(6), 166, 168, 168(2), 170(1), 170-A(2), 170-B, 181, 182, 185, 189, 190, 191, 197, 202, 250, 250(1), 250-A, 250-B and 257; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 9 - Order 1, Rule 3-B; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 27 and 29 - Schedule - Articles 64 and 65; States Reorganisation Act, 1956 - Sections 9; Madhya Bharat Jamindari Abolition Act - Sections 3, 4 and 8; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 73; Madhya Pradesh Abolition of Proprietary Rights (Estates, Mahals, Alienated Lands) Act, 1950 - Sections 3 and 4; Specific Relief Act - Sections 9; Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code (Amendment) Act, 1992; Constitution of India - Article 141; Madhya Pradesh Land R

Reported in : AIR2001MP268; 2001(3)MPHT255; 2001(2)MPLJ644

Advocate for Appellant : Shri K.K. Lahoti, Addl. Adv. General, ;Shri H.D. Gupta, ;Shri A.K. Shrivastava, ;Shri M.M. Kaushik, ;Shri B.K. Agarwal and ;Shri V.N. Pathak, Advs.;Shri R.D. Jain and ;Shri S.B. Mishra, Sr. Advs.

S.P. Srivastava, J.1. Finding a mist of confusion in the scheme underlying the provisions of the Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1959, in regard to the exclusion of the jurisdiction of the Civil Court in the...

Daler Singh Vs. State of Nct of Delhi and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1978 - Sections 438; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B, 406 and 420

Reported in : 2004(72)DRJ465

Advocate for Appellant : R.K. Jain and; R.P. Bansal, Sr. Advs.,; Rajiv Garg,;

S.K. Agarwal, J.1. By this petition under Section 438, Cr.P.C. petitioner is seeking pre-arrest bail in case FIR No. 498/2003 registered under Sections 406/420/120-B, IPC at P.S. Patiala Sadar, Punjab.2. On 19.9.2003, above case was registered...