Advanced Search Results

State of Manipur and ors. Vs. Y. Token Singh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : M.L.R. Act, 1960; M.L.R. Rules; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16 and 309

Reported in : 2007(6)ALLMR(SC)439; [2007(114)FLR912]; JT2007(3)SC606; (2007)3MLJ934(SC); 2007(3)SCALE319; (2007)5SCC65

Advocate for Appellant : Jaideep Gupta, Sr. Adv. and; Khwairakpam Nobin Singh, Adv

S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.2. The State of Manipur is in appeal before us questioning the judgment and order dated 29.07.2005 passed by a Division Bench of the Guwahati High Court in WA Nos. 61, 78,...

P and B Pharmaceuticals (P) Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11A; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 173Q

Reported in : AIR2003SC4019; 2003(86)ECC20; (2003)3GLR2041; 2003(2)SCALE390; (2003)3SCC599; [2003]2SCR252

Advocate for Appellant : A.R. Madhav Rao,; P.M. Dave,; Alok Yadav,;

ORDER1. This appeal, by the assessee, is from the final order No. 290/94-A of the Customs, Excise & Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal in Appeal No. E/03/92-A, dated October 17, 1994.2. The short point that arises for...

Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai Vs. Fisher Rosemount (India) Lt ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 14(1); Customs Valuation Rules, 1963

Reported in : AIR2002SC96; 2001(78)ECC449; 2001(134)ELT321(SC); JT2001(9)SC446; 2001(8)SCALE89; (2002)9SCC555

Advocate for Appellant : Harish N. Salve, Solicitor General, (NP),; Jai Deep Gupta and;

Santosh Hegde, J. 1. In a dispute pertaining to determination of the valuation of goods imported by the respondent herein from M/s. Roseamount Inc. USA, the Assistant Collector of Customs, Special Valuation Bench, Bombay, held that...

Sumitomo Corporation Vs. Cdc Financial Services (Mauritius) Ltd. and o ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 2(11), 10(1), 10F, 397, 398, 399 and 402; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 2, 8, 37, 44, 45, 47, 47(2), 48 and 50; Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002; Companies (Amendment) Act, 1988; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 16 to 20

Reported in : AIR2008SC1594; 2008(1)ARBLR452(SC); (2008)1CompLJ393(SC); JT2008(3)SC32; 2008(4)MhLj31; 2008(3)SCALE92; (2008)4SCC91; [2008]82SCL495(SC); 2008AIRSCW1766; MANU/SC/1101/2008

Advocate for Appellant : C.A. Sundaram, Sr. Adv.,; Krishnan Venugopal,; Rahul P. Dave

P. Sathasivam, J.1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 21.02.2007 passed by the High Court of Delhi in F.A.O. No. 305 of 2006 by which the High Court dismissed...

Burn Standard Co. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Tarun Kumar Chakraborty and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Reported in : (2002)10SCC585

S.S.M. Quadri and; Shivaraj V. Patil, JJ.1. This appeal presents an instance of application of the rule, “no work, no pay” as well as the exception to the said rule. In response to an advertisement inviting...

Shyam Telecom Ltd. Vs. Arm Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 4 and 14; Uncitral Modern Law - Article IV and IV(3)

Reported in : 2004(3)ARBLR146(Delhi); 2004(77)DRJ91

Advocate for Appellant : G.L. Sanghi (Sr.) and Suresh Singh, Advs;;

R.C. Jain, J.1. A short but important question--'whether the mandate of an Arbitrator terminates on the expiry of the stipulated period for making the Award within the meaning of Section 14 of the Arbitration and Conciliation...

Shree Subhlaxmi Fabrics Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Chand Mal Baradia and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ArbitrationCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 20 and 151 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2 - Order 43, Rule 1; Companies Act; Arbitration Rules; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 2 to 43; Contract Act - Sections 28

Reported in : AIR2005SC2161; 2005(3)ALD93(SC); 2005(5)ALLMR(SC)640; 2005(1)ARBLR623(SC); 2005(2)AWC1420(SC); (SCSuppl)2005(3)CHN123; [2005]124CompCas811(SC); (2005)4CompLJ549(SC); JT2005

Advocate for Appellant : M.N. Krishnamani and; Jaideep Gupta, Sr. Advs.,; Abhijit Seng

G.P. Mathur, J.1. This appeal by special leave has been preferred against the judgment and order dated 21.5.2002 of Calcutta High Court by which the application moved by the first respondent under Order 39 Rule 1...

Uttaranchal Forest Rangers' Asson. (Direct Recruit) and Ors. Vs. State ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2000 - Sections 8 and 73(1); Service Rules; Seniority Rules, 1991 - Rules 8, 8(1), 8(3), 26, 31 and 39; Uttar Pradesh Government Servant Seniority Rules, 1991 - Rule 8(1); Uttaranchal Government Servant Seniority Rules, 2002; Uttaranchal Subordinate Services Rules, 1951 - Rule 5; Bihar Forest Service Rules - Rules 3 and 35; Public Service Commission (Procedure) Rules, 1970 - Rules 13 and 21; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16(1) and 309

Reported in : JT2006(12)SC513; 2006(9)SCALE577; 2007(2)SLJ133(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : Jaideep Gupta, Sr. Adv.,; Pranay Ranjan and; Praneet Ranjan

AR. Lakshmanan, J.1. Delay condoned.2. Leave granted.3. These appeals were filed against the final judgment and order dated 12.4.2004 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench, Lucknow in Writ Petition No. 366(S/B)...

Bishna @ Bhiswadeb Mahato and ors. Vs. State of West Bengal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act - Sections 6, 105, 145 and 155; Arms Act; Criminal Law Act, 1967 - Sections 3; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 96 to 98, 99, 100 to 106, 109, 141, 142, 148, 149, 302, 304, 307 and 323 to 326; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 34, 145, 161; Criminal Law

Reported in : AIR2006SC302; (2006)3CALLT9(SC); JT2005(9)SC290; (2005)12SCC657

Advocate for Appellant : Jaideep Gupta, Sr. Adv.,; Anand,; Vishal Arun,;

S.B. Sinha, J.1. Bhadsa is a small village situate at a distance of 12 kms. from the district headquarters known as Purulia in the State of West Bengal. On 1.12.1982, Prankrishna, deceased and Chepulal (PW-14) heard...

Samir Mukherjee Vs. Davinder K. Bajaj and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 106, 107; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order XII, Rule 6

Reported in : AIR2001SC1696; 2001(3)ALLMR(SC)263; 2001(4)ALT23(SC); JT2001(5)SC75; (2001)3MLJ22(SC); RLW2001(2)SC254; 2001(3)SCALE431; (2001)5SCC259; [2001]3SCR88; 2001(2)LC1171(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : Jaideep Gupta,; Sanjay Sen,; R.S. Biswas,;

Phukan, J.1. In this appeal by special leave the appellant has impugned the judgment of the Division Bench of Delhi High Court passed in R.F.A. No.325 of 1997 by which the High Court upheld the judgment...