Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: jagnnath singh · Page 1 of about 8 results (0.017 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 29 2009

Ramesh Kumar Singh Vs. the Zonal Manager

Court : Patna

Decided on : Jul-29-2009

Subject : Banking

Acts : Banking Regulations Act, 1949 - Section 45ZA and 45ZA(4); ;Indian Succession Act - Section 372; ;Hindu Succession Act - Sections 14 and 15

Advocate for Appellant : Jagnnath Singh, Adv.

Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.1. Both the writ applications are taken up together as the issue involved in these two writ applications is as to whether nominee or Joint Account holder would be entitled to withdrawal of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 23 2007

Hrishikesh Saha Vs. the State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

Decided on : Jul-23-2007

Subject : Service

Acts : Classification, Control and Appeal Rules - Rule 55A; Bihar Pension Rules - Rule 43

Advocate for Appellant : Jagnnath Singh, Adv.Dharendra Choubey, Adv.

Mihir Kumar Jha, J.1. Mihir Kumar Jha, J. In this writ application the petitioner, who has retired as Executive Engineer, Canal Division, Saharsa, initially made a prayer for payment of his pension, gratuity, G.P.F. leave encashment...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 27 2004

Upendra Kumar Singh Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

Decided on : Jul-27-2004

Subject : Service

Acts : Service Law

Advocate for Appellant : Jagnnath Singh, Adv.

Nagendra Roy, J. 1. Heard counsel for the parties. 2. The petitioner has challenged the communication, as contained in annexure 6 dated 15th July, 2000, whereby and whereunder his representation has been rejected refusing to appoint...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 03 2002

Munna Singh and anr. Vs. State of Bihar

Court : Patna

Decided on : Apr-03-2002

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34 and 302; Arms Act - Sections 27; Evidence Act - Sections 3; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 164, 192, 193, 200, 202, 209, 227, 228, 229, 230, 231, 319, 319(1), 319(4) and 398

Advocate for Appellant : M.S. Madhup and Jagnnath Singh, Advs.

Chandramauli K. Prasad, J.1. This application has been filed for quashing the order dated 6-9-2000 passed by the 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Munger in Sessions Case No. 685 of 1998 whereby in exercise of power under...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 25 1991

Nathasingh Ratansingh Raghuvanshi Vs. Jagannathsingh Maharajsingh Ragh ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-25-1991

Subject : Family

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 63

Reported in : 1994(0)MPLJ209

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Jain, Adv.

ORDERT.N. Singh, J.1. This common order disposes of two appeals preferred by the propounder of a Will of deceased Maharaj Singh, said to be executed on 19-9-1968. He has preferred two separate appeals (namely, M. A....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 03 1980

Nand Ram Vs. the State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Sep-03-1980

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1980WLN(UC)336

M.B. Sharma, J.1. The above-named accused-appellant a consumer of electricity for agricultural purposes, has been convicted under Sections 333 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 39 of the Indian Electricity Act (hereinafter...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 19 2014

Ashok and Others Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-19-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

S.K. Gangele, J. (1) All these three appeals have been filed against the common judgment of conviction and sentence dated 13th May, 2005 passed by Second Additional Sessions Judge, Ashok Nagar, District Guna in Sessions Trial...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 19 2014

Dheeraj Kansana Vs. State of M.P. and Another

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-19-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

1. Heard. The petitioner is seeking to invoke the inherent powers of this Court under Section 482 of Cr.P.C to quash the FIR registered at Crime No.115/2014 at Police Station Saraichhola, district Morena, under Sections 420,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial