Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: jagmohan bansal · Page 1 of about 64 results (0.064 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 26 2013

M/S Pml Industries Limited Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise and Anot ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-26-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Jagmohan Bansal

CWP No.877 of 2013 & other connected matters 1 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARAYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.877 of 2013 Date of Decision:26. 02.2013 M/s PML Industries Limited ….Petitioner Versus...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 04 2009

iqbal Singh Sabharwal Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-04-2009

Subject : FERA

Reported in : (2009)156PLR475; [2009]91SCL379(Punj& Har)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Jagmohan Bansal

M.M. Kumar, J.1. The instant petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution prays for quashing order dated 17-11 -2008 (P.8) passed by the Deputy Director of Enforcement and the corrigendum dated 2-12-2008 (P.9) issued by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 22 2003

Sohana Woolen Mills Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-22-2003

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35F; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2004(170)ELT526(P& H)

Advocate for Appellant : Jagmohan Bansal, Adv.

ORDERG.S. Singhvi, J.1. This petition is directed against order dated 28-1-2003 (Annexure P.5) passed by the Commissioner (Appeals), Central Excise, Ludhiana declining the petitioner's prayer for waiver of requirement of depositing the disputed amount as a...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 26 2010

Rajiv Enterprises Vs. State of Punjab and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-26-2010

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 3, 3(1), 6, 6A, 6A(2), 6B, 7 and 10A; ;Consumer Protection Act, 1986; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1989 - Sections 102 and 103; ;Essential Commodities Act, 1995 - Sections 3(2) and 4

Advocate for Appellant : Rajiv Atma Ram, Sr. Adv. and; Jagmohan Bansal, Adv.

Nirmaljit Kaur, J.1. This order shall dispose of both the aforementioned Criminal Revision Petitions bearing CRR Nos. 3045 and 3046 of 2009. However, for the sake of reference, the facts are being taken from Criminal Revision...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 08 2007

Sukhdeep Singh Bhoday Vs. Joint Director General of Foreign Trade and ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Aug-08-2007

Subject : Customs

Reported in : 2007(123)ECC302; 2007(149)LC302(P& H); 2007(216)ELT181(P& H)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Jagmohan Bansal

M.M. Kumar, J. 1. A short question raised in this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution is 'whether 'proceedings for prosecution for any such offence' within the meaning of Section 127H of the Customs...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 07 2014

Present : Ms. Shalini Kaul Advocate with Vs. Nuchem Limited

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-07-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Arbitration Case No.13 of 2013 (O&M) Date of Decision:07. 02.2014 Ideal Marketing_ ..Petitioner Versus Nuchem Limited ..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, CHIEF JUSTICE.1....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 15 2007

Commissioner, Customs Vs. Leader Valves, Ltd.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-15-2007

Subject : Customs

Reported in : 2007(218)ELT349(P& H)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Ashwani Kumar Bansal

M.M. Kumar, J.1. The revenue has filed three appeals namely CUSAP No. 14, 15 and 17 of 2006 under Section 130(1) of the Customs Act,1962 (for brevity 'the Customs Act') by challenging the order dated 5.5.2005,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 04 2001

M/S. Gypsy Exports Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Jan-04-2001

Subject : Customs

Reported in : (2001)(128)ELT97TriDel

1. This is an appeal against disallowance of Drawback. The facts of the case are that the appellant imported certain raw materials in terms of Notification No. 80/95 dt. 31.3.95. Public notice under which this Notification...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 30 2009

Commissioner of Central Excise Commissionerate Vs. J.R. Fabrics (P) Lt ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Apr-30-2009

Subject : Excise

Reported in : 2009(170)LC171(P& H); [2009]21STT337

M.M. Kumar, J.1. This is an appeal by the revenue filed under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act,1944 (for brevity 'the Act') challenging order dated 10.1.2008 passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 14 2002

Collector of Central Excise Vs. Zenith Papers

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-14-2002

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 57A and 57Q

Reported in : 2002(84)ECC657; 2002(146)ELT518(P& H)

Advocate for Appellant : Rajesh Gumber, ACGSC

ORDERJawahar Lal Gupta, J.1. Is Modvat credit admissible under Rule 57A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 in respect of Wire Mesh and Felt (Synthetic Cloth for paper machines) This is the short question which arises...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial