Advanced Search Results
H.C. Chandel Vs. Union of India and anr.
Delhi
Nov-05-2001
Service
Army Rules, 1954 - Rule 13, 13A, 15 and 15A; Army Act - Sections 13-A and 19; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16
96(2002)DLT174
Jagjit Singh, Adv
J.D. Kapoor, J. 1. This is a suit for Declaration, Mandatory Injunction and Recovery of Damages against Union of India and Chief of Army Staff declaring t he termination of the plaintiff as illegal and void...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPoonam Kaur Vs. Jagjit Singh
Punjab and Haryana
May-26-2005
Family
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 13, 13(1), 23(1), 23(2) and 28; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 151 - Order 41, Rule 27
AIR2005P& H295; II(2005)DMC634; (2005)141PLR133
G.S. Grewal, Sr. Adv. and; Tanisha Peshawaria, Adv.
Ajay Kumar Mittal, J.1. This is an appeal by the wife under Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') against the judgment and decree dated 26.8.1997 passed by the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTikka Shatrujit Singh and ors. Vs. Brig. Sukhjit Singh and anr.
Delhi
Apr-06-1992
Direct Taxation
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 17, 65 and 90; Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 4, 6 and 11; Hindu Law
ILR1992Delhi1158
R.L. Tandon, Adv
P.K. Bahri, J.1. This is a suit seeking separation of the shares of the plaintiffs after due partition of the joint properties. Plaintiffs No. 1 and 2 are the sons of defendant No. 1 whereas plaintiff...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Tikka Shatrujit Singh and ors. Vs. Brig. Sukhjit Singh and anr.
Delhi
Apr-06-1992
Direct Taxation
(1992)105CTR(Del)249
P. K. BAHRI, J. :This is a suit seeking separation of the shares of the plaintiffs after due partition of the joint properties. Plaintiffs No. 1 and 2 are the sons of defendant No. 1 whereas...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSunil Kumar Vs. Union of India
Delhi
May-25-1999
Service
Constitution of India - Article 226
1999IVAD(Delhi)506; 80(1999)DLT170; 1999(50)DRJ263; (2000)ILLJ332Del
Mr. Jagjit Singh, Adv.
ORDERK. Ramamoorthy, J.1. The facts necessary for the appreciation of the questions raised by the petitioners could be narrated in the following terms:The petitioners, who are 24 in number in CW.585/88 and 7 in number in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGail (India) Ltd. Vs. Paramount Ltd.
Delhi
Apr-30-2010
Arbitration
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 16, 28(3), 31, 31(1), 31(7), 31(8) and 34; ;Arbitration Act, 1940; ;Indian Contract Act - Sections 73 and 74; ;Specific Relief Act; ;Companies Act, 1956; ;Transfer of Property Act; ;Limitation Act; ;Constitution of India - Article 142
Jagjit Singh, Adv.
Gita Mittal, J.1. GAIL (India) Ltd. (referred to as the petitioner/GAIL hereafter) entered into two contracts with the Paramount Limited ('Contractor'/respondent hereafter), one in respect of a Waste Water Treatment Plant at UPCC, Pata, and the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRakesh Chander Rastogi Vs. Appropriate Authority
Delhi
Nov-16-1998
Direct Taxation
[1999]106TAXMAN52(Delhi)
Jagjit Singh,;for the Petitioner.; R. D. Jolly and; Ajay Jh
Lahoti, J.The petitioners are aggrieved by the order dated 31-7-1995 passed by the appropriate authority, Income-tax department, New Delhi, under section 269UD(I) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('the Act'), ordering to purchase by the Central...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMindmill Software Ltd. Vs. Paragon Construction (India) Pvt. Ltd.
Delhi
Oct-20-2009
Arbitration
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 2 to 43; Evidence Act, 1872; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908
166(2010)DLT94
Jagjit Singh, Adv
Manmohan, J.1. With the consent of parties, matter is taken up for final disposal.2. The present objection petition has been filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as 'Act,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJagjit Singh and ors. Vs. State of Punjab Through the Home Secretary t ...
Punjab and Haryana
Mar-04-1994
Property
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4 and 6; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227
(1994)107PLR132
H.L. Sibal, Sr. Adv.,; M.L. Saggar and; Jagjit Singh
V.K. Jhanji, J.1. Yusaf and Ali sons of Badra owned certain land in Patiala which was erroneously declared as evacuee property. Some part of this land was subsequently restored to them and the other part could...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRattan Singh Vs. Nirmal Gill
Supreme Court of India
Nov-16-2020
Land Acquisition
JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA __
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 36813682 OF2020(Arising out of SLP (C) Nos. 2132621327 OF2019 Rattan Singh & Ors. … Appellants Versus Nirmal Gill & Ors. etc. …Respondents...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »