Advanced Search Results

Swarna Vs. State of H.P.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Section 302; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 313

Reported in : 1994CriLJ3656

Advocate for Appellant : Jagdish Vats, Amicus Curiae

Lokeshwar Singh Panta, J.1. This appeal from jail is directed against the judgment and order dated 19-9-1992 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Chamba, exercising the powers of Additional Sessions Judge, Una, in Sessions Case No....

Raj Mohammad and anr. and Gulzar Ali Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 120B, 302 and 506; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 107 and 150

Reported in : 1995CriLJ810

Advocate for Appellant : Jagdish Vats, Adv.in both the appeals

Bhawani Singh, J. 1. We propose to decide both these criminal appeals (Cr. Appeal No. 21 of 1992 and Cr! Appeal No. 22 of 1992) by this judgment since they arise out of the same judgment...

Ram Pal Vs. State of H.P.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act - Section 27; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 300, 302, 304, 307 and 324; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 154, 161 and 313

Reported in : 1996CriLJ2374

Advocate for Appellant : Jagdish Vats, Adv.

Arun Kumar Goel, J.1. Apppellant is aggrieved by his conviction and sentence for having committed offences under Sections 302 and 324, IPC ordered by the Sessions Judge, Bilaspur in sessions trial No. 3/7 of 1992 on...

Kamla Nand Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 354, 376 and 511

Reported in : 2003CriLJ547

Advocate for Appellant : Jagdish Vats and; Parkash Thakur, Advs.

ORDERLokeshwar Singh Panta, J.1. This appeal is filed by Kamla Nand (hereinafter referred to as 'the appellant') against the judgment and order dated 1-6-1998 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Shimla in Sessions Trial No. 5-S/7 of...

Amrit Lal Vs. State of H.P.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Section 376; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 313

Reported in : 2001CriLJ1047

Advocate for Appellant : Jagdish Vats, Adv.

Kuldip Chand Sood, J.1.The present appeal is directed against the judgment of the learned Sessions Judge, Kinnaur Sessions Division at Rampur Bushahr, dated March 31, 1997, in Sessions Trial No. 31-R/7 of 1995, whereby the appellant...

Parkash Chand Vs. State of H.P.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Section 376

Reported in : 1995CriLJ158

Advocate for Appellant : Jagdish Vats, Adv.

Bhawani Singh, J. 1. Through this appeal, the accused has challenged the judgment of Sessions Judge, Shimla, dated May 23, 1992 convicting him for an offennce under Section 376, of the Indian Penal Code and sentencing...

State of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Rakesh Kumar and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 147, 148, 149, 302, 307, 325, 364 and 452; ;Punjab Police Rules, 1934; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 154, 161 and 313

Reported in : 1999CriLJ564

Advocate for Appellant : B.P. Sharma, Addl. Adv. General and; J.K. Verma, Asstt. Adv. General

Lokeshwar Singh Panta, J.1. This appeal at the instance of State is directed against the judgment dated 22-5-1990 and learned Sessions Judge, Shimla passed in Sessions Trial No. 27-S/7 of 1988 whereby the accused-respondents were acquitted...

Micromax Informatics Ltd. Vs. M/S Fusion Telelinks and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Manoj Ohri, Mr. Himanshu Aggarwal

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. No.1128/2014 Date of decision:27. 11. 2014 MICROMAX INFORMATICS LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Manoj Ohri, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Himanshu Aggarwal, Adv. versus M/S...

Subhash Sahni Vs. Auro Spinning Mills

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Banking

Reported in : 2008(1)ShimLC521

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Jagdish Vats

Kuldip Singh, J.1. The record of the case has been received, with the consent of the learned Counsel for the parties, the revision has been finally heard.2. This revision petition has been filed against the judgment...

State of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Rajesh Dhiman and Another

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

Rajiv Sharma, J. This appeal by the State is directed against the judgment dated 28.12.2002, passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Kinnaur Sessions Division at Rampur Bushahr, H.P. in NDPS Case No. 03 of 2002, whereby...