Advanced Search Results
Swadeshi Polytex Ltd. Vs. Income-tax Officer, Special Ward
Allahabad
Jun-30-1980
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 142(2A) and 144
(1981)21CTR(All)54; [1981]127ITR287(All); [1980]4TAXMAN490(All)
Jagdish Swarup, ;S.N. Verma and ;Sudhir Chandra, Advs.
Yashoda Nandan, J.1. The petitioner, Swadeshi Polytex Ltd., is a public limited company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act and having its registered office at Ghaziabad in the State of Uttar Pradesh. It is engaged in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJagannath Prasad Saxena Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and anr.
Madhya Pradesh
Sep-15-1958
ConstitutionService
Constitution of India - Articles 311 and 363; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 9
AIR1959MP136; (1959)ILLJ512MP
Jagdish Swarup and ;G.P. Singh, Advs.
M. Hidayatullah, C.J. 1. The petitioner Jagannath Prasad Saxena was serving as an assistant geologist in the Vindhya Pradesh State till 18th June 1956 when he received an order of the Lieutenant Governor, Vindhya Pradesh, terminating...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChandra Mohan Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Allahabad
Nov-24-1967
ServiceConstitution
Constitution of India - Articles 233, 233(1), 233A and 309; Uttar Pradesh Higher Judicial Service Rules, 1953; Constitution of India (20th Amendment) Act - Articles 141, 142, 142(1) and 144
AIR1969All230
N. Lal and ;H.S. Goshi, Advs.
ORDERSatish Chandra, J.1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution for a writ of quo warranto calling upon the respondents 2 to 16 to show cause by what authority they are holding the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Pearey Lal Vs. Hub Lal
Allahabad
Dec-04-1944
Property
AIR1945All139
Wali Ullah, J.1. This is a plaintiff's appeal and arises out of a suit for possession and damages. The plaintiff's case briefly is this: There was a usufructuary mortgage granted in favour of defendant 1 Hub...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSushil Chander Anand Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Allahabad
May-19-1967
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 19, 19(1), 31, 48, 246, 254, 265, 266, 269, 270, 276(1), 283(2), 301 and 358; Uttar Pradesh Vritti, Vyapar, Ajivika Aur Sevayojan Kar Adhiniyam, 1965 - Sections 2(6), 2(12), 3, 4 and 5; ;Income Tax Act, 1963
AIR1969All317
M.A. Ansari, ;S.S. Bhatnagar, ;G.C. Bhattacharya and ;Ravi Swarup Dhavan, Advs.
Jagdish Sahai, J.1. These are five connected writ petitions in which vires of the Uttar Pradesh Vritti, Vyapar, Ajivika Aur Sevayojan Kar Adhiniyam, 1965 (hereinafter referred to as the Adhiniyam), passed by the Uttar Pradesh Legislature...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJ.K. Investment Trust Ltd. and ors. Vs. Muir Mills Co. Ltd. and ors.
Allahabad
Oct-10-1960
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 397 and 398
AIR1961All413; [1962]32CompCas893(All)
G.S. Pathak and ;R.S. Pathak, Advs.
Srivastava, J. 1. An application was filed under Sections 397 and 898 of the Indian Companies Act of 1956 against the company itself, its managing agents and certain of its directors. There were eight respondents to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Muir Mills Co. Ltd.
Allahabad
Jan-13-1984
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 10(2)
(1984)43CTR(All)178; [1984]148ITR418(All); [1985]20TAXMAN132(All)
Bharatji Agarwal and ;M. Katju, Advs.
1. This is an income-tax reference under Section 66 of the repealed Indian I.T. Act, 1922. It relates to the assessment year 1954-55. A question which has been referred to the court for its answer is...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Askishwari Khetan Sugar Mills (P.) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Allahabad
Feb-26-1971
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 10(2); ;Essential Supplies Act
[1972]86ITR635(All)
R.R. Agarwal and ;S.N. Agarwal, Advs.
Kirty, J.1. Pursuant to an order of this court dated July 28, 1964, under Section 66(2) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Allahabad Bench, has referred the following two questions along with...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Saroj Giri Vs. Vayalar Ravi and ors.
Allahabad
Apr-28-1998
CriminalConstitution
Judges (Inquiries) Act, 1968; Constitution (Forty-Fourth Amendment) Act, 1978 - Sections 15; ;Judges Enquiry Rules; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 491; Constitution of India - Articles 12, 19, 22(5), 32, 105, 105(1), 105(2), 121, 122(2), 124, 124(5), 125, 129, 143, 143(1), 194, 194(2), 194(3), 205, 211, 215, 212, 212(2), 226 and 226(1); Contempt Law
1999CriLJ498
A.P.N. Giri, ;Sarvodaya Singh, ;Gyanendra Mrityunjaya and ;Rajesh Srivastava, Advs.
ORDER1. Through this petition, filed on August 26, 1996, the petitioner prays to issue show cause notices to Respondents Nos. 1 to 15 Sri Vayalar Ravi, Sri John. F. Fernandes, Smt. Jayanti Natrajan, Sri S.S. Ahluwalia,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRavindra Motilal Shah Vs. Chinubhai Chimanlal Dalal and ors.
Gujarat
Sep-10-1975
Arbitration
(1976)17GLR758
Mr. R.M. Vin
J.M. Sheth, J.1. This appeal arises out of the judgment and order passed by the learned judge of the City Civil Court, Ahmedabad, Mr. H. B. Shah, dated 7th April, 1970, in Review Applications Nos. 71...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »