Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: jagdish swarup · Page 1 of about 253 results (0.059 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jun 30 1980

Swadeshi Polytex Ltd. Vs. Income-tax Officer, Special Ward

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jun-30-1980

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 142(2A) and 144

Reported in : (1981)21CTR(All)54; [1981]127ITR287(All); [1980]4TAXMAN490(All)

Advocate for Appellant : Jagdish Swarup, ;S.N. Verma and ;Sudhir Chandra, Advs.

Yashoda Nandan, J.1. The petitioner, Swadeshi Polytex Ltd., is a public limited company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act and having its registered office at Ghaziabad in the State of Uttar Pradesh. It is engaged in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 15 1958

Jagannath Prasad Saxena Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-15-1958

Subject : ConstitutionService

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 311 and 363; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 9

Reported in : AIR1959MP136; (1959)ILLJ512MP

Advocate for Appellant : Jagdish Swarup and ;G.P. Singh, Advs.

M. Hidayatullah, C.J. 1. The petitioner Jagannath Prasad Saxena was serving as an assistant geologist in the Vindhya Pradesh State till 18th June 1956 when he received an order of the Lieutenant Governor, Vindhya Pradesh, terminating...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 24 1967

Chandra Mohan Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Nov-24-1967

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 233, 233(1), 233A and 309; Uttar Pradesh Higher Judicial Service Rules, 1953; Constitution of India (20th Amendment) Act - Articles 141, 142, 142(1) and 144

Reported in : AIR1969All230

Advocate for Appellant : N. Lal and ;H.S. Goshi, Advs.

ORDERSatish Chandra, J.1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution for a writ of quo warranto calling upon the respondents 2 to 16 to show cause by what authority they are holding the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 04 1944

Pearey Lal Vs. Hub Lal

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-04-1944

Subject : Property

Reported in : AIR1945All139

Wali Ullah, J.1. This is a plaintiff's appeal and arises out of a suit for possession and damages. The plaintiff's case briefly is this: There was a usufructuary mortgage granted in favour of defendant 1 Hub...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 19 1967

Sushil Chander Anand Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-19-1967

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 19, 19(1), 31, 48, 246, 254, 265, 266, 269, 270, 276(1), 283(2), 301 and 358; Uttar Pradesh Vritti, Vyapar, Ajivika Aur Sevayojan Kar Adhiniyam, 1965 - Sections 2(6), 2(12), 3, 4 and 5; ;Income Tax Act, 1963

Reported in : AIR1969All317

Advocate for Appellant : M.A. Ansari, ;S.S. Bhatnagar, ;G.C. Bhattacharya and ;Ravi Swarup Dhavan, Advs.

Jagdish Sahai, J.1. These are five connected writ petitions in which vires of the Uttar Pradesh Vritti, Vyapar, Ajivika Aur Sevayojan Kar Adhiniyam, 1965 (hereinafter referred to as the Adhiniyam), passed by the Uttar Pradesh Legislature...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 10 1960

J.K. Investment Trust Ltd. and ors. Vs. Muir Mills Co. Ltd. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Oct-10-1960

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 397 and 398

Reported in : AIR1961All413; [1962]32CompCas893(All)

Advocate for Appellant : G.S. Pathak and ;R.S. Pathak, Advs.

Srivastava, J. 1. An application was filed under Sections 397 and 898 of the Indian Companies Act of 1956 against the company itself, its managing agents and certain of its directors. There were eight respondents to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 13 1984

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Muir Mills Co. Ltd.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-13-1984

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 10(2)

Reported in : (1984)43CTR(All)178; [1984]148ITR418(All); [1985]20TAXMAN132(All)

Advocate for Appellant : Bharatji Agarwal and ;M. Katju, Advs.

1. This is an income-tax reference under Section 66 of the repealed Indian I.T. Act, 1922. It relates to the assessment year 1954-55. A question which has been referred to the court for its answer is...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 26 1971

ishwari Khetan Sugar Mills (P.) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-26-1971

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 10(2); ;Essential Supplies Act

Reported in : [1972]86ITR635(All)

Advocate for Appellant : R.R. Agarwal and ;S.N. Agarwal, Advs.

Kirty, J.1. Pursuant to an order of this court dated July 28, 1964, under Section 66(2) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Allahabad Bench, has referred the following two questions along with...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 28 1998

Smt. Saroj Giri Vs. Vayalar Ravi and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-28-1998

Subject : CriminalConstitution

Acts : Judges (Inquiries) Act, 1968; Constitution (Forty-Fourth Amendment) Act, 1978 - Sections 15; ;Judges Enquiry Rules; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 491; Constitution of India - Articles 12, 19, 22(5), 32, 105, 105(1), 105(2), 121, 122(2), 124, 124(5), 125, 129, 143, 143(1), 194, 194(2), 194(3), 205, 211, 215, 212, 212(2), 226 and 226(1); Contempt Law

Reported in : 1999CriLJ498

Advocate for Appellant : A.P.N. Giri, ;Sarvodaya Singh, ;Gyanendra Mrityunjaya and ;Rajesh Srivastava, Advs.

ORDER1. Through this petition, filed on August 26, 1996, the petitioner prays to issue show cause notices to Respondents Nos. 1 to 15 Sri Vayalar Ravi, Sri John. F. Fernandes, Smt. Jayanti Natrajan, Sri S.S. Ahluwalia,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 10 1975

Ravindra Motilal Shah Vs. Chinubhai Chimanlal Dalal and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Sep-10-1975

Subject : Arbitration

Reported in : (1976)17GLR758

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. R.M. Vin

J.M. Sheth, J.1. This appeal arises out of the judgment and order passed by the learned judge of the City Civil Court, Ahmedabad, Mr. H. B. Shah, dated 7th April, 1970, in Review Applications Nos. 71...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial