Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: jagannath setty · Page 1 of about 7 results (0.018 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 29 1965

State of Mysore Vs. Anantreddy and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Oct-29-1965

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 207-A(4)

Reported in : AIR1966Mys210; 1966CriLJ932; (1965)2MysLJ786

Somnath Iyer, J.(1) This reference has for its source a revision petition which was presented by 31 accused to the District Magistrate, Gulbarga before whom the complaint ventilated was that there was non-compliance with the provisions...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 23 1961

Amargundappa Arali Oil Miller, Gangavti Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-23-1961

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Finance Act, 1950 - Sections 13(1); Hyderabad Income-tax Act - Sections 58

Reported in : AIR1962Kant70; AIR1962Mys70

Advocate for Appellant : K. Jagannatha Shetty, Adv.

Samantha Iyer, J.(1) This application involves the interpretation of Section 13 of the Indian Finance Act, 1950. The question arises in this way.(2) For the assessment years 1357 F. and 1358 F., the Petitioner who was...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 25 1962

Meenakshi Vs. Presiding Officer, Mysore State Transport Appellate Trib ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Oct-25-1962

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 43(A), 46, 47(1), 57(2) and 61; Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 306; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1963Mys278

Advocate for Appellant : T. Krishna Rao ; and K. Jagannath Setty, Advs.

A.R. Somnath Iyer, J.1. On November 26, 1957, the Regional Transport Authority, South Kanara, invited applications under Section 57(2) of the Motor Vehicles Act, for the grant of a permit for the operation of a stage...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 14 1958

Venkatrao Vs. Mallappa

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-14-1958

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 20, Rule 10 - Order 21, Rule 31

Reported in : AIR1959Kant164; AIR1959Mys164; ILR1958KAR559; (1958)36MysLJ916

Advocate for Appellant : Jagannath Setty, Adv.

1. This is a Second Appeal filed by the judgment-debtor. The facts giving rise to this appeal may he briefly stated as follows: The Respondent decree holder had filed a suit No. 583/1 of 1952-53 on...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 30 1961

Gangavva Vs. Udachappa

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Oct-30-1961

Subject : Civil

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 10, 18, 18(1), 18(2), 19, 20, 21 and 45; Hyderabad Land Acquisition Act, 1309 - Sections 14, 14(1), 16 and 17; Indian Land Acquisition Act - Sections 18

Reported in : AIR1964Kant107; AIR1964Mys107; (1963)2MysLJ403

Advocate for Appellant : K. Jagannath Setty, Adv.

1. The question referred for the decision of the Full Bench is:'Whether the Acquisition Court can go behind a reference made by the Collector under Section 14 of the Hyderabad Land Acquisition Act, if the application...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 24 1965

State of Mysore Vs. Baswanath Rao and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-24-1965

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 56 and 496; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 353

Reported in : AIR1966Mys71; 1966CriLJ267; (1965)1MysLJ365

ORDER(1) An important question whether the Court has power to grant what is called 'anticipatory bail' arises for consideration in this revision case. (2) The Tahsildar, Bhalki, lodged a complaint on 23-1-1964 with the police at...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 05 1973

Bangalore Bottling Co. (Pvt.) Ltd., Represented by Its Director, Sri B ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-05-1973

Subject : Excise

Reported in : 1979CENCUS50D

ORDERK. Jagannath Setty, J.1. The Petitioner is a private limited company, which I shall call as 'the Company'.2. The Company is manufacturing for sales aerated waters under different trade marks, viz., Gold Spot, Kismet, Rimzim and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial