Advanced Search Results

Karpal Singh Vs. Sardar Lakh Singh

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Civil

Reported in : 1980WLN577

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. D.S. Shishodia

S.K. Mal Lodha, J.1. This is a defendant's revision under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the order dated July 25, 1980 of the District Judge, Bhilwara passed in Civil Original Suit No....

Mansukh Ram Vs. the State and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1977CriLJ563; 1976(9)WLN445

ORDERKalyan Dutta, J.1. This is an application-in-revision by Mansukh Ram against the judgment of the Session Judge, Jhunjhunu, dated 3rd September, 1975, whereby the order of the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Jhunjhunu, dated 9th June, 1975, declaring that...

The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Grasim Industries Limited

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 260A and 260A(7); Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35H and 35G; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 29(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908

Reported in : (2009)225CTR(Bom)127; [2009]319ITR154(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : J.S. Saluja, Adv.

1. This notice of motion is taken out by the revenue seeking condonation of delay of 575 days in filing the above Appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (`I.T. Act' for short)....

Narayan Singh Vs. the State

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 423

Reported in : AIR1968Raj46

Advocate for Appellant : J.S. Saluja, Adv.

ORDERB.P. Beri, J.1. Narayan Singh, a truck driver, was convicted by the Munsiff-Magistrate, Bharatpur under Section 338 of the Indian Penal Code to six months' rigorous imprisonment. On appeal the learned Sessions Judge, Bharatpur mentioned the...

Mishrilal Vs. District Judge, Jodhpur and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Civil

Acts : Legal Practitioners Act, 1879 - Sections 36, 36(1), 36(2A) and 36(4); Rajasthan High Court Ordinance, 1949 - Sections 18; Constitution of India - Article 19(1) and 19(5)

Reported in : AIR1971Raj247; 1970(3)WLN550

Advocate for Appellant : J.S. Saluja, Adv. as an intervener; Mangharam, Adv.

Beri, J. 1. This is a special appeal under Section 18 of the Rajasthan High Court Ordinance, 1949, directed against the rejection in limine of a civil writ petition by a learned single Judge of this...

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Wackhardt International Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 20 and 37(1)

Reported in : [2009]314ITR11(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : Sureshkumar, Adv., i/b., J.S. Saluja, Adv.

1. The present appeal can be considered on the following questions:(1) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the hon'ble Income-tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in allowing the assessee's...

Gheesaram Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Rajasthan Panchayat Act, 1953 - Sections 21(4) and 73

Reported in : AIR1979Raj52; 1977()WLN368

Advocate for Appellant : J.S. Saluja, Adv.

ORDERD.P. Gupta, J.1. The case of the petitioner is that he was not afforded a proper opportunity of hearing before the order of supersession of the Panchayat Thepri was passed by the State Government. The second...

Dewan and ors. Vs. State

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 435, 438 and 497(5)

Reported in : AIR1971Raj77; 1971CriLJ506; 1970(3)WLN774

Advocate for Appellant : J.S. Saluja, Adv.

ORDERKan Singh, J. 1. This revision application before me raises a short point about the powers of the Sessions Judge under Section 497 (5), Criminal Procedure Code to cancel bail, granted by the Magistrate, before the...

The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Reliance Capital Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act - Sections 260A

Reported in : (2009)225CTR(Bom)275; [2009]181TAXMAN242(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : Vimal Gupta, Adv., i/b., P.S. Sahadevan, Adv. in N/M No. 3319/08, ;R. Ashokan and ;P.S. Sahadevan, Advs. in N/M Nos. 3926, 3931, 3932, 3933, 3936 and 3937/08, ;J.S. Saluja, Adv. in N/M No. 3928/08 and

Swatanter Kumar, C.J.1. By this order, we will dispose of the above referred 11 Notice of Motions taken out by the Commissioner of Income Tax , Mumbai for condonation of delay in filing Interest Tax Appeal...

Bhumiputra Commerce Bank Vs. P.V.P. Products Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Evidence Act - Sections 63 and 65

Reported in : 2006(4)BomCR431; 2006(4)MhLj646

Advocate for Appellant : N.R. Mody, Adv., i/b., Rustamji and Ginwala, Advs.;J.S. Saluja, Adv. i/b., M.V. Kini and Co.;A. Vishwanatha Iyer, Chief Manager

S.U. Kamdar, J.1. The present suit is filed for the recovery of sum of Rs. 29,62,400/- with further interest at the rate of 18% p.a. from the date of the suit till the date of the...