Advanced Search Results
Audumbar Manohar Randive and Others Vs. the State of Maharashtra and O ...
Mumbai
Sep-19-1997
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 102, 141, 147, 148, 149, 300, 302, 304, 323, 326, 504 and 506; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 154, 165 and 313; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 27, 45, 59 and 61
1998(5)BomCR53; 1998(2)MhLj511
Ms. Revati Mohite-Dere, ;Ms. J.S. Pawar, ;Adhik Shirodkar, ;Rajendra Shirodkar, ;Ms. B.L. Mahant and; P.N. Patil, Advs.
ORDERVishnu Sahai, J.1. Since these four connected matters arise out of same set of facts and a common impugned judgment, we are disposing them off by one judgment.2. Five persons, namely Audumbar Manohar Randive, Sharad @...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe State of Maharashtra Vs. Sampat Balvant Magar and ors.
Mumbai
Oct-31-1996
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 147, 148, 149, and 324; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3 and 32; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 154 and 378
1997(2)BomCR42
J.S. Pawar, A.P.P. in Cr. A. 517 and ;Neelima Pawar, Adv. for R.S. Bhonsale, V.R. Bhosale and Sujata Mogare, Advs. for petitioner in C.R.A. No. 321 of 1983
Vishnu Sahai, J.1. Since both these matters arise out of same set of facts and a common impugned judgment, we are disposing them of by one judgment.2. A perverse judgment of acquittal dated 18-4-1983 passed by...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe State of Maharashtra Vs. Capt. C.P. Krishna Nair and Others
Mumbai
Dec-21-1998
Criminal
Wild Life Protection Act, 1972 - Sections 51and 58(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 377; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 101
1999(5)BomCR286; (1999)1BOMLR873
J.S. Pawar, A.P.P.
ORDERD.G. Deshpande, J. 1. Heard J.S. Pawar, A.P.P. for the State/appellant and Mr. Marwadi for the respondents. 2. The State has filed this application challenging the Order of Magistrate, 22nd Court, Andheri, Mumbai G.V. Wadekar dated...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
P.K. Ramkrishna and Others Vs. Neelkanth M. Kamble and Another
Mumbai
Jan-24-1996
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 114, 166, 409 and 418; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 200, 202 and 482
1996(5)BomCR438; 1996CriLJ2119; 1996(2)MhLj328
G.R. Rege, Adv.
ORDER1. Heard Mr. G. R. Rege for the petitioners, Mr. A. P. Mundergi with Mr. V. Gurumurthy for Respondent No. 1 and Mrs. J. S. Pawar, APP for Respondent No. 2. Rule, returnable forthwith by consent...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRamesh Bhagwan Manjrekar and Others Vs. State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Jul-05-1996
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 114, 302 and 324; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 161 and 313 ; Evidence Act - Sections 134
1997BomCR(Cri)126; 1997CriLJ796
Suresh Gholkar holding for ;S.G. Samant, Adv.
Vishnu Sahai, J. 1. By means of this appeal the appellants have challenged the judgment and order dated 31st May, 1982 passed in Sessions Case No. 6 of 1981, by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Greater...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskEknath Malu Ratate Vs. the State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Oct-06-1997
Criminal
(1997)99BOMLR642
Vishnu Sahai, J.1. This appeal was on Admission Board. Since, in our view, only an offence under Section 304(2) I.P.C., is made out against the appellant; he has already been in jail for 3 years and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBabulal Chottelal Shah Vs. State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Mar-01-1996
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 120B, 307, 341, 352 and 506; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 73(8), 439 and 482
1996(3)BomCR570; 1996CriLJ3145
M.S. Mohite, Adv.
ORDER1. Heard Mr. M. S. Mohite for the petitioner and Ms. J. S. Pawar for the State of Maharashtra. Rule returnable forthwith by consent. The APP waives service. By means of this application preferred under section...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSadulla Shakur Sonde Vs. the Collector, Dist. Raigad (Alibaug),
Mumbai
May-02-2003
Constitution
Bombay Minor Mineral Extraction Rules, 1955 - Rule 39A
2003(4)ALLMR523; 2003(4)BomCR491; 2003(4)MhLj695
Suresh S. Pakale, Adv.
C.K. Thakker, C.J.1. Both these petitions have been filed by the petitioners for quashing and setting aside Notification dated March 11, 2003 and a public auction held in pursuance of the said Notification on March 19,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAjit Chandrakant Satka(sic), Prop. of Ajit Motels Pvt. Ltd. Vs. the Di ...
Mumbai
Jun-26-2003
Civil
2003(4)ALLMR96; 2004(2)BomCR252
V.R. Manohar, Sr. Adv. and ;Veena B. Thadani, Adv.
C.K. Thakker, C.J.1. Writ Petition No. 3645 of 2003 not on Board. At the request of the learned counsel for the parties, it is taken on Board and heard finally with an identical matter, being Writ...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBhaskar B. Bhosle Prop. of Rajnigandha Restaurant and Bar Vs. State of ...
Mumbai
Jul-21-2003
Civil
Bombay Police Act, 1951 - Sections 162
2003(4)ALLMR56; 2003(6)BomCR592; 2003(4)MhLj328
P.C. Kansara, Adv.
C.K. Thakker, C.J.1. Rule. Smt. J.S. Pawar, learned Additional Government Pleader appears and waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of respondent nos. 1,3,5 and 6. In the facts and circumstances, the matter is taken...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »