Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: j s pawar · Page 1 of about 31 results (0.066 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 19 1997

Audumbar Manohar Randive and Others Vs. the State of Maharashtra and O ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-19-1997

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 102, 141, 147, 148, 149, 300, 302, 304, 323, 326, 504 and 506; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 154, 165 and 313; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 27, 45, 59 and 61

Reported in : 1998(5)BomCR53; 1998(2)MhLj511

Advocate for Appellant : Ms. Revati Mohite-Dere, ;Ms. J.S. Pawar, ;Adhik Shirodkar, ;Rajendra Shirodkar, ;Ms. B.L. Mahant and; P.N. Patil, Advs.

ORDERVishnu Sahai, J.1. Since these four connected matters arise out of same set of facts and a common impugned judgment, we are disposing them off by one judgment.2. Five persons, namely Audumbar Manohar Randive, Sharad @...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 31 1996

The State of Maharashtra Vs. Sampat Balvant Magar and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-31-1996

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 147, 148, 149, and 324; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3 and 32; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 154 and 378

Reported in : 1997(2)BomCR42

Advocate for Appellant : J.S. Pawar, A.P.P. in Cr. A. 517 and ;Neelima Pawar, Adv. for R.S. Bhonsale, V.R. Bhosale and Sujata Mogare, Advs. for petitioner in C.R.A. No. 321 of 1983

Vishnu Sahai, J.1. Since both these matters arise out of same set of facts and a common impugned judgment, we are disposing them of by one judgment.2. A perverse judgment of acquittal dated 18-4-1983 passed by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 21 1998

The State of Maharashtra Vs. Capt. C.P. Krishna Nair and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-21-1998

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Wild Life Protection Act, 1972 - Sections 51and 58(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 377; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 101

Reported in : 1999(5)BomCR286; (1999)1BOMLR873

Advocate for Appellant : J.S. Pawar, A.P.P.

ORDERD.G. Deshpande, J. 1. Heard J.S. Pawar, A.P.P. for the State/appellant and Mr. Marwadi for the respondents. 2. The State has filed this application challenging the Order of Magistrate, 22nd Court, Andheri, Mumbai G.V. Wadekar dated...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 24 1996

P.K. Ramkrishna and Others Vs. Neelkanth M. Kamble and Another

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-24-1996

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 114, 166, 409 and 418; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 200, 202 and 482

Reported in : 1996(5)BomCR438; 1996CriLJ2119; 1996(2)MhLj328

Advocate for Appellant : G.R. Rege, Adv.

ORDER1. Heard Mr. G. R. Rege for the petitioners, Mr. A. P. Mundergi with Mr. V. Gurumurthy for Respondent No. 1 and Mrs. J. S. Pawar, APP for Respondent No. 2. Rule, returnable forthwith by consent...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 05 1996

Ramesh Bhagwan Manjrekar and Others Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-05-1996

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 114, 302 and 324; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 161 and 313 ; Evidence Act - Sections 134

Reported in : 1997BomCR(Cri)126; 1997CriLJ796

Advocate for Appellant : Suresh Gholkar holding for ;S.G. Samant, Adv.

Vishnu Sahai, J. 1. By means of this appeal the appellants have challenged the judgment and order dated 31st May, 1982 passed in Sessions Case No. 6 of 1981, by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Greater...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 06 1997

Eknath Malu Ratate Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-06-1997

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1997)99BOMLR642

Vishnu Sahai, J.1. This appeal was on Admission Board. Since, in our view, only an offence under Section 304(2) I.P.C., is made out against the appellant; he has already been in jail for 3 years and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 01 1996

Babulal Chottelal Shah Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-01-1996

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 120B, 307, 341, 352 and 506; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 73(8), 439 and 482

Reported in : 1996(3)BomCR570; 1996CriLJ3145

Advocate for Appellant : M.S. Mohite, Adv.

ORDER1. Heard Mr. M. S. Mohite for the petitioner and Ms. J. S. Pawar for the State of Maharashtra. Rule returnable forthwith by consent. The APP waives service. By means of this application preferred under section...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 02 2003

Sadulla Shakur Sonde Vs. the Collector, Dist. Raigad (Alibaug),

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : May-02-2003

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Bombay Minor Mineral Extraction Rules, 1955 - Rule 39A

Reported in : 2003(4)ALLMR523; 2003(4)BomCR491; 2003(4)MhLj695

Advocate for Appellant : Suresh S. Pakale, Adv.

C.K. Thakker, C.J.1. Both these petitions have been filed by the petitioners for quashing and setting aside Notification dated March 11, 2003 and a public auction held in pursuance of the said Notification on March 19,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 26 2003

Ajit Chandrakant Satka(sic), Prop. of Ajit Motels Pvt. Ltd. Vs. the Di ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-26-2003

Subject : Civil

Reported in : 2003(4)ALLMR96; 2004(2)BomCR252

Advocate for Appellant : V.R. Manohar, Sr. Adv. and ;Veena B. Thadani, Adv.

C.K. Thakker, C.J.1. Writ Petition No. 3645 of 2003 not on Board. At the request of the learned counsel for the parties, it is taken on Board and heard finally with an identical matter, being Writ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 21 2003

Bhaskar B. Bhosle Prop. of Rajnigandha Restaurant and Bar Vs. State of ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-21-2003

Subject : Civil

Acts : Bombay Police Act, 1951 - Sections 162

Reported in : 2003(4)ALLMR56; 2003(6)BomCR592; 2003(4)MhLj328

Advocate for Appellant : P.C. Kansara, Adv.

C.K. Thakker, C.J.1. Rule. Smt. J.S. Pawar, learned Additional Government Pleader appears and waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of respondent nos. 1,3,5 and 6. In the facts and circumstances, the matter is taken...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial