Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: j radhakrishnan · Page 1 of about 98 results (0.130 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 28 2003

S. Veerakumar Vs. State Bank of India by Its Chairman,

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-28-2003

Subject : Service

Acts : Payment of Gratuity Act; Pension Rules - Rule 8; State Bank of India Employees' Pension Fund Rules - Rules 2(2), 7, 8, 20 and 22; Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules - Rule 19; Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules - Rule 49; Border Security Border Rules - Rule 19; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226

Reported in : (2004)ILLJ138Mad

Advocate for Appellant : J. Radhakrishnan, Adv. for ;A. Muthukumar & P.Nareshkumar

ORDERE. Padmanabhan, J. 1. The petitioner has prayed for the issue of a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records of the respondents relating to the payment of pension to the petitioner and quash the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 23 2005

State Bank of Hyderabad, Industrial Finance Branch Vs. S.P. Savithri,

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-23-2005

Subject : Banking

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR2005Mad275; [2006]130CompCas191(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : V.J. Radhakrishnan, Adv. in WA 1307 and R3 in WP Nos. 22418 and 29411 and ;N.S. Nandakumar, Adv.

ORDERD. Murugesan, J.1. As the issues involved in the Writ Appeal and the Writ Petitions are one and the same, they are taken up together for disposal by this Common Order.2. For the disposal of both...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 25 2023

Baby Saroja vs the Taluk Supply Officer

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Aug-25-2023

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF AUGUST 2023 / 3RD BHADRA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 28953 OF 2023 PETITIONER/S: BABY SAROJA AGED 75 YEARS W/O.P.J...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Oct 08 2013

Lalithambika Vs. N.Padmakumar

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Oct-08-2013

Subject : Education

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOMAS P.JOSEPH TUESDAY, THE8H DAY OF OCTOBER201316TH ASWINA, 1935 Con.Case(C).No. 1206 of 2013 () ------------------------------- OP(C) 513/2010 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 17 2001

P. Manicka Chettiar, P. Muthera, Vs. Commissioner of Customs (P), West

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

Decided on : Oct-17-2001

Subject : Land Acquisition

1. When the matter came up for hearing today, nobody appeared on behalf of the appellants. However, our attention has been drawn to the letter written by one Advocate, Shri J.Radhakrishnan praying for adjournment to the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 10 2025

K.a.S.Zainulabdin and Co vs P. Manicka Chettiar

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-10-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 10.02.2025CORAM :THE HON'BLE MR.K.R.SHRIRAM, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE R.KALAIMATHI & C.M.P.Nos.2281, 2285 & 2287 of 2025 M/s. K.A.S. Zainulabdin & Co. No.196, Angappan Street Chennai 600...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 30 2020

Dheera N.G. vs Simeesh S.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Nov-30-2020

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALEXANDER THOMAS MONDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2020 / 9TH AGRAHAYANA, 1942 OP(Crl.).No.281 OF 2020 AGAINST THE ORDER IN M.P. NO.509/2018 DATED 10.03.2020...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 30 2020

Simeesh.S. vs Dheera N.G.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Nov-30-2020

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALEXANDER THOMAS MONDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2020 / 9TH AGRAHAYANA, 1942 OP(Crl.).No.281 OF 2020 AGAINST THE ORDER IN M.P. NO.509/2018 DATED 10.03.2020...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 14 1998

H. Amalraj Vs. Regina

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-14-1998

Subject : Civil

Reported in : 1998(2)CTC502

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. R. Bharanitharan, Adv.

ORDER1. The revision petitioner is the defendant in the suit filed by the respondent/plaintiff in O.S.No.973 of 1995 for a money decree on the basis of pro-note dated 29.1.1994, said to have been executed by the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 25 2002

Fidelity Finance Ltd., Chennai Rep. by Its Law Officer Vs. Banking Omb ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-25-2002

Subject : BankingConstitutionCommercial

Acts : The Constitution of India - Article 226; Indian Companies Act

Reported in : [2004]55SCL73(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : T.K. Seshadri, Adv.

ORDERE. Padmanabhan, J.1. The petitioner a company, registered under the Indian Companies Act, carrying on non banking finance activities engaged in hire purchase, lease, bill discounting and other financial service activities seek for the issue of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial