Advanced Search Results

S. Veerakumar Vs. State Bank of India by Its Chairman,

Court : Chennai

Subject : Service

Acts : Payment of Gratuity Act; Pension Rules - Rule 8; State Bank of India Employees' Pension Fund Rules - Rules 2(2), 7, 8, 20 and 22; Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules - Rule 19; Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules - Rule 49; Border Security Border Rules - Rule 19; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226

Reported in : (2004)ILLJ138Mad

Advocate for Appellant : J. Radhakrishnan, Adv. for ;A. Muthukumar & P.Nareshkumar

ORDERE. Padmanabhan, J. 1. The petitioner has prayed for the issue of a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records of the respondents relating to the payment of pension to the petitioner and quash the...

State Bank of Hyderabad, Industrial Finance Branch Vs. S.P. Savithri,

Court : Chennai

Subject : Banking

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR2005Mad275; [2006]130CompCas191(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : V.J. Radhakrishnan, Adv. in WA 1307 and R3 in WP Nos. 22418 and 29411 and ;N.S. Nandakumar, Adv.

ORDERD. Murugesan, J.1. As the issues involved in the Writ Appeal and the Writ Petitions are one and the same, they are taken up together for disposal by this Common Order.2. For the disposal of both...

Baby Saroja vs the Taluk Supply Officer

Court : Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF AUGUST 2023 / 3RD BHADRA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 28953 OF 2023 PETITIONER/S: BABY SAROJA AGED 75 YEARS W/O.P.J...

Lalithambika Vs. N.Padmakumar

Court : Kerala

Subject : Education

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOMAS P.JOSEPH TUESDAY, THE8H DAY OF OCTOBER201316TH ASWINA, 1935 Con.Case(C).No. 1206 of 2013 () ------------------------------- OP(C) 513/2010 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN...

P. Manicka Chettiar, P. Muthera, Vs. Commissioner of Customs (P), West

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

Subject : Land Acquisition

1. When the matter came up for hearing today, nobody appeared on behalf of the appellants. However, our attention has been drawn to the letter written by one Advocate, Shri J.Radhakrishnan praying for adjournment to the...

H. Amalraj Vs. Regina

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Reported in : 1998(2)CTC502

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. R. Bharanitharan, Adv.

ORDER1. The revision petitioner is the defendant in the suit filed by the respondent/plaintiff in O.S.No.973 of 1995 for a money decree on the basis of pro-note dated 29.1.1994, said to have been executed by the...

Fidelity Finance Ltd., Chennai Rep. by Its Law Officer Vs. Banking Omb ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : BankingConstitutionCommercial

Acts : The Constitution of India - Article 226; Indian Companies Act

Reported in : [2004]55SCL73(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : T.K. Seshadri, Adv.

ORDERE. Padmanabhan, J.1. The petitioner a company, registered under the Indian Companies Act, carrying on non banking finance activities engaged in hire purchase, lease, bill discounting and other financial service activities seek for the issue of...

State Bank of Mysore Rep. by Its Chief Manager Vs. Pukhrajmal Sugarmal ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Banking

Reported in : [2008]143CompCas218(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : J. Radhakrishnan, Adv.

P.K. Misra, J.1. The present appeal is filed by the first defendant against the judgment and decree of the learned single Judge in C.S. No. 260 of 1988 dated 5.5.1999 decreeing the suit for a sum...

Shree Engineering Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (2001)(75)ECC88

This appeal is filed by the above appellant against the above captioned order dated 10.1.94 praying for setting aside the same and order for De novo adjudication, after hearing the appellant.1. The brief facts of case...

Dr. Devendra Vs. the Commissioner, Corporation of Madras, Ripon Buildi ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Contempt of Court

Acts : Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 12; Town and Country Planning Act - Sections 79 and 256 (3); M.C.M.C. Act - Sections 256 (1), (2) and (3)

Reported in : 2001CriLJ4823; (2001)2MLJ10

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. G. Subramanian, ;Senior Counsel for Mr. K. Ravi Anatha Padmanbhan, Adv.

ORDERN.K. Jain, C.J.1. This Contempt Application has been filed for punishing the respondents for non compliance and wilful disobedience of the order of this Court dated 3.8.2000 in W.A. No.1171 of 2000, despite the receipt of...