Advanced Search Results

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. TIn Box Co.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961

Reported in : (2003)182CTR(Del)171; [2003]260ITR637(Delhi)

Advocate for Appellant : J.R. Goel and; Ajay Jha, Advs

D.K. Jain, J.1. These five appeals by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (for short 'the Act'), are directed against a consolidated order dated October 19, 2001, passed by the Income-tax Appellate...

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. All India Films Corpn.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 256(1)

Reported in : (2008)214CTR(Del)55; [2008]297ITR358(Delhi)

Advocate for Appellant : J.R. Goel, Adv. in ITR No. 113 of 1986 and; P.N. Monga, Adv. in ITR Nos. 114 and 115 of 198

S. Muralidhar, J.1. A question that frequently engages the attention of our tax courts has been referred for our opinion by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench 'D', New Delhi (Tribunal1) under Section 256(1) of...

Prem Chand Bansal and Sons Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 43B, 256, 256(1) and 256(2); Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5, 29 and 29(2)

Reported in : 1998VIAD(Delhi)623; (1999)156CTR(Del)252; 76(1998)DLT193; [1999]237ITR65(Delhi); (1999)122PLR2

Advocate for Appellant : J.R. Goel, Adv

R.C. Lahoti, J.1. An application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, seeking condensation of delay in filing a petition under Section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, is the subject-matter of the present order.2....

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. S. Pritam Singh

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 132, 158BC and 260A

Reported in : [2005]272ITR359(Delhi)

Advocate for Appellant : J.R. Goel, Adv

D.K. Jain, J.1. This appeal by the Revenue under section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (for short 'the Act'), is directed against the order dated June 26, 2002, passed by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi...

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Dr. Indu Bala Chhabra

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income-Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 28, 45(2), 54(2) and 260A

Reported in : [2002]258ITR111(Delhi)

Advocate for Appellant : J.R. Goel, Adv

D.K. Jain, J. 1. This is an appeal under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short 'the Act'), from the order passed by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench 'B', New Delhi (in short...

Cit Vs. Moti Electric Industries (P) Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2002]125TAXMAN590(Delhi)

Advocate for Appellant : J.R. Goel and; Ajay Jha,;for the Revenu

ORDERThe matter has been placed before the court for appropriate orders as the revenue, at whose instance the reference has been made, has failed to file the paper books. Since, in our view, answer to the...

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Pushpak Enterprises

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 143(1), 147 and 149

Reported in : [2002]254ITR193(Delhi)

Advocate for Appellant : J.R. Goel and; Premlata Bansal, Advs

S.B. Sinha, C.J.1. The appellant herein has filed appeals under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), against the order dated December 19, 2000, passed by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal,...

Cit Vs. Pushpak Enterprises

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2001)172CTR(Del)172

Advocate for Appellant : J.R. Goel and; Ms. Premlata Bansal, for the Revenue; B. Gup

S.B. Sinha, C.J.The appellant herein has filed appeals under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') against the order dated 19-12-2000 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi...

Bharat Singh Vs. Sheo Parshad Giani Ram and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 21, Rule 58

Reported in : AIR1978Delhi122; ILR1977Delhi695

Advocate for Appellant : S.N. Chopra,; G.N Aggarwal,; J.R. Goel and;

ORDER21, R. 58 of the Code provides a summary remedy to third parties, i.e., persons other than judgment-debtors or their legal representatives for raising objections to the attachment of the property. Where a third party has...

Anglo-dutch, Colour and Varnish Works Private Limited Vs. India Tradin ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39, Rule 1; Trade & Merchandise Marks Act, 1958; Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 55

Reported in : AIR1977Delhi41; ILR1976Delhi116

Advocate for Appellant : N.K. Anand and ; J.R. Goel, Advs

Yogeshwar Dayal, J. (1) This is an application on behalf of the plaintiff for restraining the defendant-respondents, its servants, agents and representatives from manufacturing, selling, offering for sale or otherwise dealing in white zinc paint under...