Advanced Search Results

Aman Ullah Khan Vs. State and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 (IPC) - Sections 406, 420, 468, 471, 506; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 200, 156(3), 482; Arbitration and Conciliation Act - Section 11

Advocate for Appellant : Mr.Vikas Arora, Adv.

1. Vide the instant petition the petitioner has sought to quash the complaint case bearing No.03/10 titled as "Mehar Elahi & Ors. v. Aman Ullah Khan" and FIR No.112/2011, PS Hazrat Nizamuddin under Sections 406/420/468/471/506 Indian...

Ku. Anita, Minor Vs. Atal Bihari and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Juvenile Justice Act, 1986 - Sections 2, 32, 37 and 38; Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 35; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 21 and 376

Reported in : 1993CriLJ549

Advocate for Appellant : K.S. Shrivastava, Adv.;J.P. Sharma, Adv.

ORDERS.K. Dubey, J.1. This is a revision under Section 38 of the Juvenile Justice Act, 1986 (for short, the 'Act') against the order dated 15-11-1991, passed by the First Additional Sessions Judge, Bhind, in Criminal Appeal...

Phatik Chandra Choudhury Vs. State of Assam and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Service

Acts : Assam Services (Pension) Rules, 1969 - Rule 21

Advocate for Appellant : J.P. Sharma, Adv.

1. Heard Mr. JP Sharma, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. Also heard Mr, B. Goswami, learned Jr. Govt. Advocate,1. The grievances of the petitioner in this writ petition are three-fold i.e.:-(i) Non-payment of...

J.P. Sharma Vs. Naresh Chand Gupta

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Tenancy

Reported in : (1982)2SCC42

S. MURTAZA FAZAL ALI, J. (Vacation Judge)1. In this case, after the undertaking given by the tenant a new development appears to have taken place which is contested by both the parties. According to the tenant,...

State of Rajasthan Vs. Dr. J.P. Sharma and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1983CriLJ858; 1982()WLN60

M.B. Sharma, J.1. This is a State appeal against the judgment dated February 8, 1973 passed by Special Judge, for Rajasthan, Jaipur city, in Special Criminal Case No. 19/71 acquitting the accused-respondents of the charges under...

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Sara Enterprises

Court : Chennai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 143(3), 263, 263(3), 271(1), 274(1), 275 and 275(1); Wealth Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 25 and 25(2)

Reported in : (1997)141CTR(Mad)442; [1997]224ITR169(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : C.V. Rajan, Adv.

Thanikkachalam, J.1. At the instance of the Department, the Tribunal referred the following two questions, for the opinion of this Court, under s. 256(1) of the IT Act, 1961 : '1. Whether, on the facts and...

Vidyaram Kanauha Vs. Punabi and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Sections 3 and 30

Reported in : 1992ACJ596; (1999)IIILLJ410MP

Advocate for Appellant : J.P. Sharma, Adv.

T.N. Singh, J.1. Second bout of litigation employer is fighting in this Court challenging the award passed against him under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 (for short 'the Act'). Earlier, he had come in M.A. No....

Om Prakash Narang vs.central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

* % + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:16. h March, 2017 Decided on:5. h September, 2017 CRL.A. 134/2016 OM PRAKASH Represented by: Mr. Devashish Maharishi, for ..... Appellant...

Yesudanam vs.the State Represented By: Cbi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

* % + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:16. h March, 2017 Decided on:5. h September, 2017 CRL.A. 134/2016 OM PRAKASH Represented by: Mr. Devashish Maharishi, for ..... Appellant...

Natha Ram Suman vs.state (Cbi)

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

* % + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:16. h March, 2017 Decided on:5. h September, 2017 CRL.A. 134/2016 OM PRAKASH Represented by: Mr. Devashish Maharishi, for ..... Appellant...