Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: j p pandey · Page 1 of about 59 results (0.249 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 29 1999

Kakar Sugar Works Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-29-1999

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Sugarcane (Purhcase Tax) Act, 1961 - Sections 3(1); Uttar Pradesh Sugarcane (Purchase Tax) Rules, 1961 - Rules 13A(1), (2) and (4);

Reported in : 2000(1)AWC210

Advocate for Appellant : J.P. Pandey, Adv.

P. K. Jain, J. 1. In the assessment year 1994-95, the petitioner was operating a sugar cane crusher under the name and style of M/s. Kakar Sugar Works. He had submitted Option in Form 13 in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 22 2005

Kushal Pal Singh Son of Sri Chheddi Singh Vs. State of U.P. and Sri Ha ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-22-2005

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138 and 142; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482

Reported in : 2005(2)ALD(Cri)24; III(2005)BC464; 2005CriLJ3035

Advocate for Appellant : J.P. Pandey, Adv.

K.N. Ojha, J.1. Instant application has been moved under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash the prosecution of applicant Kushal Pal Singh in Criminal Case No. 837 of 2001, Harpal Singh v. Kushal Pal Singh pending in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 06 2005

Umesh Chandra Sharma Son of Late Shri Jagdish Chandra Sharma Vs. the S ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-06-2005

Subject : Service

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Recruitment of Dependants of Government Servant Dying in Harness Rules, 1974 - Rule 5; Uttar Pradesh Recruitment of Dependants of Government Servant Dying in Harness (Amendment) Rules, 1993 - Rule 5(1); Dying in Harness Rules

Reported in : 2006(1)AWC273

Advocate for Appellant : J.P. Pandey, Adv.

Sanjay Misra. J.1. The petitioner is son of late. Jagdish Chandra Sharma who died on 7.9.1981 while working as a constable in the U.P. Civil Police Department at District Tehri Garhwal. The petitioner is elder of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 24 2005

Mukesh (Minor) Son of Mahajan Under the Guardianship of Smt. Rukmani D ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-24-2005

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Stamp Act - Sections 33, 47A, 56 and 341; Stamp Rules; Land Acquisition Act; Constituttion of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2005(3)AWC2529

Advocate for Appellant : J.P. Pandey, Adv.

A.P. Sahi, J.1. The present writ petition questions the legality of the orders dated 30.12.1995 and 11.9.1996 passed by the Additional Collector (Finance & Revenue), Maharajganj and Chief Revenue Controlling Authority/Board of Revenue, U.P. at Allahabad,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 01 2013

Upendra Kumar Kaliya Vs. South Eastern Coal Fields Limited

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-01-2013

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Satish Shrivastava, Mr. D.K. Dixit, Mr. Vikas Mishra, Mr. Shailendra Verma, Mr. P.S. Tomar, Mr. Sunil Singh Sengar, Mr. Gajendra Tamsikar, Mr. V.K. Shukla, Mr. Pushpendra Yadav, Mr. Manot Chandurkar, Mr. Jitendra Tiwari, Mr. G.S. Gaharwar

Review Petition No.986/2012 01.03.2013 Mr. Satish Shrivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. K.B. Bhatnagar, learned counsel for the respondents. Heard on I.A. No.14613/2012, an application for condonation of delay. For the reasons assigned in the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 13 2013

Sanjay Kumar Singh Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Aug-13-2013

Subject : Education

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S). No. 6527 of 2010 Sanjay Kumar Singh .... Petitioner Versus Union of India & others ..... Respondents ---------- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH For the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 22 2013

Sh. J.P.Pandey and ors. Vs. M/S Hindustan Prefab Ltd. and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-22-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. R.K.Kaushik

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % W.P.(C) No. 2564/2013 22nd April, 2013 SH. J.P.PANDEY & ORS. Through: ......Petitioners Mr. R.K.Kaushik, Advocate. VERSUS M/S HINDUSTAN PREFAB LTD. & ORS. ...... Respondents...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 12 2012

Smt.Snehlata JaIn and anr Vs. Contonment Board and ors

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-12-2012

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Rajneesh Gupta

1 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH : JABALPUR WRIT PETITION No.4090/2001 Smt. Snehlata Jain & another Vs. The Cantonment Board, Sagar & others ____________________________________________________________ Shri Rajneesh Gupta, learned Counsel for the petitioners. Smt. Indira Nair, learned...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 31 1995

Hada Leasing and Industries Ltd. Vs. the Pradeshiya Industrial and Inv ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Oct-31-1995

Subject : Commercial

Acts : State Financial Corporations Act, 1951 - Sections 29; Constitution of India - Article 226; Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985

Reported in : AIR1996All209

Advocate for Appellant : R.P. Goyal, Adv.

ORDERPalok Basu, J.1. The petitioner Hada Leasing & Industries Limited have filed this writ petition initially with the prayer that a mandamus should issue commanding the respondents not to sell the petitioner's unit under S. 29...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 08 2001

Bheeshm Pal and Another Vs. Vith Addl. District Judge, Muzaffarnagar a ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-08-2001

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Urban Building (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 2; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2001(2)AWC1556

Advocate for Appellant : P.K. Jain, Adv.

B. K. Rathi, J.1. The suit for eviction of the petitioners and recovery of rent was filed by the respondent Nos. 3 and 4 being Suit No. 35/93. It was alleged in the plaint that U.P....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial