Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: j p cama · Page 1 of about 221 results (0.056 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 15 2004

Basf India Limited and anr. Vs. M. Gurusamy and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-15-2004

Subject : Service

Acts : Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 - Sections 2

Reported in : 2004(3)ALLMR499; [2004(101)FLR724]; (2004)IILLJ500Bom; 2004(2)MhLj164

Advocate for Appellant : J.P. Cama, Sr. Counsel, ;G.S. Shetty, Adv., i/b., Crawford Bayley and Co.

R.M. Lodha, J.1. This Appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated February 23, 1995 passed by the learned Single Judge whereby the Writ Petition filed by the present Appellants aggrieved by the order dated...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 27 2006

Mahindra and Mahindra Limited Vs. Dwarkanath Babaji Dalvi and Mahindra ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-27-2006

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 - Sections 44; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2; Constitution of India - Articles 136, 226 and 227

Reported in : 2006(3)BomCR805; [2006(109)FLR747]; (2006)IIILLJ177Bom; 2006(4)MhLj88

Advocate for Appellant : J.P. Cama and ;C.U. Singh, Sr. Counsels, ;R.N. Shah and ;Sanjay Udeshi, Advs., i/b., Sanjay Udeshi and Co.

V.C. Daga, J.1. This petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is directed against the order of the Industrial Court, Mumbai dated 25th October, 2005 dismissing the revision application preferred by the petitioner-...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 04 2008

Suman V. JaIn (Dr.) Vs. Marwadi Sammelan and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-04-2008

Subject : Service

Acts : Evidence Act - Sections 115; Constitution of India - Articles 226, 217(1) 227 and 299; Government Service Conduct Rules; Delhi School Education Rules - Rule 114A; Punjab National Bank (Officers) Service Regulations, 1979 - Regulation 20(2)

Reported in : 2008(6)BomCR808

Advocate for Appellant : J.P. Cama, Sr. Counsel a/w., ;Mihir Desai and ;Alok Gupta, Advs.

Majmudar P.B., J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order of the learned Single Judge dated 8-8-2006 passed in Writ Petition No. 1611 of 2004 (Suman V. Jain v. Marwadi Sammelan) 2006 B.C.I. 156...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 08 2007

Sunil Pannalal Banthia and ors. Vs. City and Industrial Development Co ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-08-2007

Subject : Property

Acts : Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, 1966 - Sections 45 and 159; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 23 and 25; Bombay Disposal of Land Regulations, 1975 - Regulation 4; Constitution of India - Article 141

Reported in : AIR2007SC1529; 2007(2)AWC1447(SC); II(2007)CPJ11(SC); 2007(1)CTLJ97(SC); JT2007(4)SC271; 2007(4)SCALE216; (2007)10SCC674

Advocate for Appellant : J.P. Cama, Sr. Adv.,; Nitin S. Tambwekar,; Sunil I. Jayakar

Altamas Kabir, J.1. Leave granted.2. This appeal is directed against the order passed by the Division Bench of the Bombay High Court dismissing the writ petition filed by the appellants herein challenging the action of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 19 2001

Godrej and Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd. Vs. Jaikrishna Jan Bahadur Singh and an ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-19-2001

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 - Sections 28

Reported in : 2002(2)ALLMR147; 2002(3)BomCR622; [2002(92)FLR1100]

Advocate for Appellant : J.P. Cama, Adv., i/b., ;K.P. Anilkumar, Adv.

Nishita Mhatre, J.1. Writ Petition No. 6443 of 1995 is filed by the petitioner employer challenging the order dated 20th October, 1995 passed by the Industrial Court in Complaint (U.L.P.) No. 648 of 1992 filed by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 17 2003

Bajaj Auto Ltd. Vs. Bhojane Gopinath D. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-17-2003

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 - Sections 28, 30 and 30(1); Model Standing Orders - Rule 4C; Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 - Sections 2, 2A, 2A(1), 3, 3(1), 3(2), 3(18), 4, 5, 5(2), 5(3), 6, 6(2), 7, 10, 10(A), 13(1) and 15; Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) (Bombay Amendment) Act, 1957; Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Central Rules, 1946 - Rule 4C; Bombay Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Rules, 1959; Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) (Maharashtra Amendment) Act, 1974; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

Reported in : JT2003(10)SC440; (2004)ILLJ821SC; 2003(10)SCALE77; (2004)9SCC488; 2004(2)SLJ238(SC); 2004(1)LC707(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : J.P. Cama,; K.K. Singhvi,; Shekhar Naphade,;

B.N. AGRAWAL,J. These appeals by special leave have been filed by appellant-Company against judgment rendered by Aurangabad Bench of Bombay High Court in writ applications whereby Award made by Industrial Court, Aurangabad, in the individual complaints...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 25 2011

Hindustan Unilever Ltd. Vs. Hindustan Lever Kamgar Sangh and anr.

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Decided on : Aug-25-2011

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226, 227; Bombay Industrial Relations Act 1946 - Section 73 A, Section 119 D

Advocate for Appellant : Shri J. P Cama; Shri H V Thakur, Advs.

1) Rule with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties made returnable forthwith and heard. 2) The above petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India takes exception to the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 22 2004

Godrej and Boyce Manufacturing Company Private Limited Vs. Kherulla Ha ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-22-2004

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 33C(2)

Reported in : 2005(1)ALLMR626; 2005(2)BomCR206; [2005(104)FLR547]; (2005)ILLJ697Bom; 2005(1)MhLj317

Advocate for Appellant : J.P. Cama, Adv., i/b., K.P. Anilkumar

V.C. Daga, J.1. This appeal is directed against the order 28th April, 2000 passed by the learned Single Judge in the Writ Petition No. 147 of 1995 confirming the order dated 7-10-1994 passed by the Presiding...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 15 2002

Thanco Bank Karmachari Sangh Vs. Thane Bharat Sahakari Bank Ltd. and o ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-15-2002

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971; Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946 - Sections 42

Reported in : [2002(93)FLR350]; (2002)IILLJ328Bom

Advocate for Appellant : J.P. Cama and ;S.S. Chaubal, Advs.

ORDERR.J. Kochar, J. 1. The petitioner is a Trade Union, registered under the Trade Unions Act, 1926, and is also registered as the Representative Union under the Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946, for the Co-operative Banking...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 16 2003

Transport Corporation of India Vs. Maharashtra Rajya Mathadi Transport ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-16-2003

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10(1)

Reported in : [2003(96)FLR653]; (2004)ILLJ238Bom

Advocate for Appellant : J.P. Cama and ;Rajesh Gehani, Advs.

A.P. Shah, J.1. This group of appeals arises out of the award of the Industrial Tribunal delivered on August 29, 1997 in Reference (IT) No. 225 of 1981 under the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial