Advanced Search Results

Cit Vs. Dadha Plantations (P) Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2002)177CTR(Mad)138

Advocate for Appellant : J Naresh Kumar, for the Revenue R. Meenakshisundaram, for the Assessee

N.V. Balasubramanian, J.At the instance of the revenue, the Tribunal has stated the case and referred the following common questions of law with regard to the interpretation of section 40A(8) of the Income Tax Act in...

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Dadha Plantations (P.) Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income-Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 40A(8)

Reported in : [2002]258ITR639(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : J. Naresh Kumar, Adv.

N. V. Balasubramanian, J. 1. At the instance of the Revenue, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal has stated the case and referred the following common questions of law with regard to the interpretation of Section 40A(8) of...

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Rajaram Mills P. Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(11), 32(1), 41(2) and 260A

Reported in : [2008]302ITR10(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : J. Naresh Kumar, Adv.

P.D. Dinakaran, J.1. The above tax case appeals are directed against the order of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal dated June 14, 2005, made in I. T. A. Nos. 858, 898 and 899/Mds/2002, for the assessment years...

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. T.V.S. Sewing Needles Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(11), 80HHC, 32(1), 41(2) and 260A

Reported in : [2008]302ITR13(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : J. Naresh Kumar, Adv.

P.D. Dinakaran, J.1. The above tax case appeals are directed against the order of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal dated March 17, 2006, made in I.T.A. Nos. 1121/Mds/2002, 415/Mds/2000 and 1167/Mds/2001 for the assessment years 1997-98, 1995-96...

Cit Vs. Ponds India Ltd

Court : Chennai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2002)174CTR(Mad)235; [2002]253ITR686(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : J. Naresh Kumar, for the Revenue None appeared, for the Assessee

R. Jayasimha Babu J. The assessee-company was incorporated on 5-5-1977, for the purpose of taking over the business which was being run by an. American company, Chesebrough Ponds Inc. The American company had been carrying on...

Cit Vs. Sree Senhavalli Textiles (P) Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2003]259ITR77(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : J. Naresh Kumar, for the Revenue None appeared, for the Assessee

R. Jayasimha Babu, J. The question referred to us at the instance of the revenue is,'Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is correct in law in upholding the order...

Catholic Centre Vs. Pilot Pen Co. (India) Pvt. Ltd. (In Liquidation)

Court : Chennai

Subject : CompanyDirect Taxation

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 446(2); Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 220(2); Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rule 9

Reported in : [2002]112CompCas552(Mad); (2004)4CompLJ565(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : J. Naresh Kumar, Junior Standing Counsel for Income-tax Department;M.K. Kabir, Adv.

P. Sathasivam, J. 1. A director of the Pilot Pen Company (India) Private Limited, the company under liquidation has filed the above application seeking a direction to the first respondent-official liquidator, High Court, Madras, to remit...

Hotel Ramprasad Vs. Cit

Court : Chennai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2002]124TAXMAN348(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : K. Ramagopal, for the Assessee J. Naresh Kumar, for the Revenue

ORDERV.S. Sirpurkar, J. The question referred to us at the instance of the assessee is as under :'Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in restoring the disallowance...

Cit Vs. O.P. Agro Borewell Service

Court : Chennai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2002]125TAXMAN54(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : J. Naresh Kumar, for the Revenue

ORDERV.S. Sirpurkar, J. The question referred to us at the instance of the department is as under :'Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal was right in law in...

Cit Vs. Sitalakshmi Mills Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2003]131TAXMAN509(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : J. Naresh Kumar, for the Revenue

ORDERK. Raviraja Pandian, J.The question referred to us, at the instance of the revenue, for our consideration is, 'whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal was right in holding...