Advanced Search Results
Jaggannath Dwarkanath Raje Vs. the State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Nov-17-1971
Service
(1972)74BOMLR320; 1972MhLJ618
Vaidya, JJ.1. This petition raises a difficult question under the Bombay Civil Services Rules, as amended by the Bombay Civil Services (7th Amendment) Rules, 1971.2. The petitioner challenges the order dated June 9, 1971 and the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVithalrao Ramchandra Ghorpade Vs. the State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Nov-19-1971
Service
(1972)74BOMLR523; 1972MhLJ841
Deshpande, J.1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is directed against an order passed by the State Government against the petitioner on June 18, 1971 informing him that the Government has decided...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMunicipal Corporation of Greater Bombay Vs. Miss S.R. Dethe
Mumbai
Dec-11-1970
Service
(1971)73BOMLR738
Chandrachud, J.1. There are two proceedings before us. One of them, though described as a 'First Appeal' is in effect a reference by the City Civil Court, Bombay, under the proviso to Section 113 of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
T. Purushotham Rao and Another Vs. State of Telangana, Rep. by its Pri ...
Andhra Pradesh
Dec-22-2015
Land Acquisition
1. The present writ petition questions the notice dated 31.07.2015 issued by the fourth respondent under Section 7 of the A.P. Land Encroachment Act, 1905 (for short the Act'). 2. A contention is raised by the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSurendra Prasad Misra Vs. Engineer-in-chief, Irrigation Department and ...
Allahabad
Sep-16-2003
Service
Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 226 and 311
(2004)2UPLBEC1479
V.S. Dwivedi, ;U.S. Mishra and ;S.K. Tripathi, Advs.
R.B. Misra, J.1. Heard Sri U.S. Mishra learned Counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri Raj Kumar learned Standing Counsel for the respondents.2. The listing application is disposed of and the writ petition is being...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBritannia Biscuit Co. Ltd., Employees' Union vs. Asst. Commissioner of ...
Chennai
Dec-08-1983
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 2A, 10A, 12, 12(3), 12(4), 18, 18(1), 18(3), 22, 23, 25(F) and 25(G)
(1983)ILLJ181Mad
Mr. N. G. R. Prasad
1. The appellant is the writ petitioner.2. The writ petitioner is the Britannia Biscuit Co. Ltd. Employees' Union represented by its Secretary. The writ petition was filed praying for the issue of a writ of declaration,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBalasubramaniam Roadways (Firm), Dindigul Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and ...
Chennai
Feb-12-1980
Motor Vehicles
Tamil Nadu Motor Vehicles Rules - Rule 269 and 269(1)
AIR1980Mad318; (1980)1MLJ517
G. Ramaswand, Adv. for ;P. Vedavalli, Adv.
ORDER1. The short facts leading to this writ petition are as follows: The State Transport Authority, Madras, pursuant to Government D. 0. No. 114321/ Transport/VII-77-78 Home, dated 22-41978, has issued a circular No. 6/79 dated 25-1-1979:...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskN.S. Tewana Vs. Union of India and ors.
Delhi
Mar-25-1994
Constitution
Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 - Sections 61
1994IIAD(Delhi)593; 54(1994)DLT578; 1994(29)DRJ258
Arun Jaitley,; H.S. Phoolka,; Madan Lokur and;
C.M. Nayar, J.(1) The present petition has been filed to quash the Notification No. S.O. 813(E) dt. December 2, 1991, and Notification No. S.O. 814(E) of the same date as well as for quashing the communication...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskV. Haridas Vs. the Assistant Commissioner, Sales Tax (Assessment), Spe ...
Kerala
Nov-08-1978
Sales Tax
[1979]44STC26(Ker)
V. Sivaraman Nair,; V.M. Nayanar and; K. Kanakachandran
V.P. Gopalan Nambiyar, C.J. 1. The writ petitioner/appellant was an assessee to sales tax from whom arrears of sales tax were due in respect of assessments for the years 1970-71 to 1973-74. The arrears amounted to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. K. Gopala Krishana (Died) and ors.
Andhra Pradesh
Jan-10-2003
Service
Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 - Rules 48 and 56
2003(2)ALT210; (2003)IIILLJ130AP
M. Ratna Reddy, Adv.
Bilal Nazki, J. 1. This is a writ petition filed by the Union of India challenging the orders passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench in O.A. No. 518 of 1995 on 19.3.1998. 2. 1st...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »