Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: j n pandey · Page 1 of about 18 results (0.120 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 06 2001

Ghannu Mal and ors. Vs. Additional Distt. Magistrate (C.S.)/R.C.E.O., ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-06-2001

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 16(1) and 34(4); Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Rules, 1972 - Rule 25

Reported in : 2001(4)AWC2563

Advocate for Appellant : J.N. Pandey, ;B.N. Tripathi and ;Y.N Srivastava, Advs.

U.K. Dhaon, J.1. Heard Sri J. N. Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned standing counsel, who has put in appearance on behalf of opposite party No. 1.2. The petitioners have approached this Court...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 05 2006

Javed Jameel Vs. Distt. Judge and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-05-2006

Subject : Property

Reported in : 2006(4)AWC4184

Advocate for Appellant : Sri. J.N. Pandey

Rakesh Sharma, J.1. Heard Sri J.N. Pandey, learned Counsel for the petitioner. Sri Saurabh Lawanla has put in appearance on behalf of Smt. Hafsa Mahmood, opposite party No. 3.2. The petitioner has assailed the judgment and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 03 2006

Virendra Singh Pal Vs. Distt. Judge and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-03-2006

Subject : Tenancy

Reported in : 2007(1)AWC1009

ORDERA.N. Verma, J.1. I have heard Sri J.N. Pandey, earned Counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri N.K. Shukla, who has put in appearance on behalf of opposite party No. 3.2. The instant writ petition...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 25 2011

Kishore and ors. Vs. Additional District Judge, Court No.8,lucknow and ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-25-2011

Subject : Civil

Acts : U.P. Act 13 of 1972 - Section 21(1)(a), 34(c), 16(1) (b), 34(g) and Rule 22(d); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Section 151, Order 41 Rule 27

Advocate for Appellant : Mohd. Aslam Khan

1. Heard Mohd Arif Khan learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mohd. Aslam Khan, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Nrapendra  Misra holding brief of Sri Manish Kumar learned counsel for opposite party no.1, Sri N.K. Pandey...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 13 2007

Umeshwar Upadhyay Vs. the State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Feb-13-2007

Subject : Service

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 224 and 225

Reported in : 2007(2)BLJR1093; [2007(2)JCR221(Jhr)]

Advocate for Appellant : R.C.P. Sinha and; Rakesh Kr. Sinha, Advs. in LPA No. 456 of 2004 and J.N. Pandey, JC to AG in LPA No.

ORDERLPA No.456 of 20041. The appellant in this appeal is a Constable, who has joined the service in the year 1980. On 18.1.2002 he was entrusted with the work of escorting three under trial prisoners from...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 27 2004

i.T.W. Signode India Ltd. (iii) and anr. Vs. State of Bihar and anr.

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Feb-27-2004

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Central Sales Tax Act - Sections 3; Bihar Finance Act - Sections 17(5) and 33(1); Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : [2004(2)JCR385(Jhr)]; [2006]144STC547(Jharkh)

Advocate for Appellant : S.B. Gadodia,; J.N. Pandey and; M.S. Mittal, Advs.

P.K. Balasubramanyan, C.J.1. The petitioner-company has its registered office in Hyderabad in the State of Andhra Pradesh and is manufacturing steel strap systems in collaboration with Signode Corporation, USA. It is an assessee registered under the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 16 2003

Kali Agro Chemicals Ltd. Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Sep-16-2003

Subject : CivilLabour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Policy, 1995; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : [2003(4)JCR734(Jhr)]

Advocate for Appellant : S.B. Gadodia, Sr. Adv.,; J.N. Pandey,; Sumeet Gadodia

ORDER1. Heard counsel for the petitioner and GP-III for the respondents.2. The petitioner claimed the benefit of S.O. 479 issued under the Industrial Policy, 1995 as modified by S.O. 58. The question that arose was whether...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 26 1972

State Vs. Mahmood Butt and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-26-1972

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1973CriLJ881

ORDERP.N. Bakshi, J.1. This is a revision filed by Sri B. N. Katju, the Public Prosecutor against the order of the I Civil and Sessions Judge. Allahabad dated 13.3.1972 rejecting his application for withdrawal of criminal...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 26 1972

M. Butt and ors. Vs. State

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-26-1972

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1973CriLJ886

ORDERP.N. Bakshi, J.1. The applicant Sri Mahmood Butt, I.A.S. was the Administrator of the Nagar Mahapalika. Allahabad in the month of July, 1969. On 29.7.1969 a number of persons belonging to the Nagar Mahapalika staff went...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 30 2004

Shyam Bahadur Vs. Bank of Baroda and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-30-2004

Subject : Service

Reported in : (2005)IILLJ89All; (2004)3UPLBEC2622

Advocate for Appellant : K.M.L. Hajela, ;Anil Hajela and ;Rakesh Pandey, Advs.

Sunil Ambwani, J.1. Heard Sri Rakesh Pandey for petitioner. No one appears for respondents. On 18.3.2004, the Court had clarified that no further adjournment shall be granted to the respondents. The matter was, as such, heard...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial