Advanced Search Results
Raghu Raj Pratap Singh Alias Raja Bhaiya Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Allahabad
Mar-13-2003
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 19(1), 105(1), 194, 194(1) and 194(2)
2003(3)AWC2106
Rishab Murtaza, ;Vivek Raj Singh, ;L.P. Mishra, ;S.P. Shukla, ;J.N. Mathur and ;Dhruv Mathur, Advs.
Jagdish Bhalla, J. 1. Initially, Writ Petition No. 1107 (MB) of 2003, Raghuraj Pratap Singh alias Raja Bhaiya v. State of U.P. and Ors. was filed before this Court and when the hearing was going on,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskModi Industries Ltd. Vs. U.P. State Electricity Board
Allahabad
Oct-14-2004
SICA
Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 16, 17, 18, 22, 22(1), 22(3) and 25; Indian Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948
[2005]62SCL11(All)
J.N. Mathur and ;Syad Haseen, Advs.
1. In these three writ petitions, filed by M/s. Modi Industries Limited, the petitioner challenges the demand notices issued by the then U.P. State Electricity Board (now known as U.P. Power Corporation Limited) for payment of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Angoori Devi Vs. Chief Commissioner (Admn.)
Allahabad
Nov-20-2004
Direct Taxation
[2005]145TAXMAN64(All)
Mrs. T. Punvani, A. Shukla, R.C. Shukla, J.N. Mathur & R.N. Trivedi, for the Assessee D.D. Chopra, for the Revenue.
ORDERThis petition has been filed, challenging the order of Chief Commissioner (Admn.), U.P./Commissioner of Income-tax, Lucknow dated 29-3-1985.2. A notice under section 263 of the Income Tax Act was issued for enhancing the tax on the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Reliance Industries Limited and Others Vs. State of U.P. and Others
Allahabad
Sep-07-2012
Land Acquisition
Devi Prasad Singh, J. 1. The petitioner has preferred instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India feeling aggrieved with the impugned order passed under Section 25 of the Uttar Pradesh Value Added...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Commissioner of Income Tax-i,lucknow. Vs. M/S Bora Polyclinic Pvt. ...
Allahabad Lucknow
Jul-05-2010
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 143 (1), 148, 142 (1), 147, 148, 143 (2) ;
D.D. Chopra, Adv.
1. Heard Sri D.D. Chopra, learned counsel for the appellant and Sri J.N. Mathur, learned Senior Counsel on behalf of the respondent and perused record.2. Since common question of law are involved in both the appeals,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRam Lakhan Singh Vs. State Govt. of U P
Supreme Court of India
Nov-17-2015
Education
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.933 OF2014Dr. RAM LAKHAN SINGH …. PETITIONER VERSUS STATE GOVERNMENT OF UTTAR PRADESH THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY …. RESPONDENT JUDGMENT N.V. RAMANA, J.This petition...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskManna Lal Govila Vs. Dr. J.N. Mathur
Allahabad
Oct-10-1959
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100 and 115
AIR1960All534
K.B. Garg, Adv.
ORDERS.S. Dhavan, J. 1. This is a civil revision against a decree of the learned Civil Judge, Varanasi dismissing the plaintiff applicant's suit for fixation ot rent under the Control of Rent and Eviction Act. The...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income-tax-ii Vs. Lucknow Public Educational Society
Allahabad
Jan-09-2009
Direct Taxation
[2009]318ITR223(All); [2009]183TAXMAN68(All)
Sri. D.D. Chopra
Satish Chandra, J.1. This is an appeal filed by the Department under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 against the judgment and order dated 29-6-2007 passed by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Lucknow in Income-tax Appeal...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSaf Yeast Company Private Limited Vs. State of U.P. and anr.
Allahabad
Oct-24-2008
Sales Tax/VAT
(2009)24VST152(All)
Sri. Gaurav Mehrotra
U.K. Dhaon, J.1. Heard Sri Prashant Chandra, Senior Advocate, assisted by Sri Gaurav Mehrotra, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri Jaideep Narayan Mathur, learned Additional Advocate-General assisted by Sri H. P. Srivastava, learned Additional Chief...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAjit Kumar Srivastava Vs. Nagar Palika Parishad and anr.
Allahabad
Jul-15-2004
Banking
III(2007)BC574
Mr. J.N. Mathur
U.K. Dhaon, J.1. Heard Mr. J.N. Mathur, learned Counsel for the petitioner. Mr. D.K. Tripathi who has put in appearance on behalf of opposite parties 1, 2 and 4 and the learned Standing Counsel.2. The petitioner...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »