Advanced Search Results

Kaviraj Sudhindranath Sen Vs. Jibandas Agarwalla

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 1, Rule 8 - Order 22, Rule 4(4)

Reported in : AIR1963Cal467

Advocate for Appellant : J. Majumdar, Adv. as Amicus curiae

S. Datta, J. 1. On the 6th December 1939 Kaviraj Sudhindranath Sen filed this mortgage suit against the mortgagor Narsinghdas Agarwalla who is now represented by his nephew, sole heir and legal representative, Jibandas Agarwalla and...

Ashok Mangu Toppo and Anr Vs. Education

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Land Acquisition

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 4216 of 2016 ------ 1. Ashok Mangu Toppo, son of Late Harma Toppo, Resident of village-Nagri, P.O.- Bukru, P.S.- Kanke, District-Ranchi and at present working as...

Kumar Rashmirathee Singh Vs. The State of Jharkhand Through C B I

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Land Acquisition

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B. A. No. 3674 of 2016 Kumar Rashmirathee Singh …… Petitioner Versus The Union of India through C.B.I …… Opposite Party ­­­­­­­­­ CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT...

Pradip Kumar Das Vs. State of Tripura and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Civil

Acts : Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1956 - Rules 11, 14, 14 (1) and (3) to (23); Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965 - Rule 16(1); Constitution of India - Article 226

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. P. Roy Barman, Ms. M. Deb Roy and Mr. B. Saha, Advs.

1. Heard Mr. P. Roy Barman, learned counsel for petitioner. Also heard Mr. U.B. Saha, learned senior Govt. Advocate, assisted by Mr. J. Majumdar, learned counsel the respondents.2. By this writ petition under Article 226 of...

Pradip Kumar Das Vs. State of Tripura and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Civil

Acts : Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1956 - Rules 11, 14, 14 (1) and (3) to (23);; Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965 - Rule 16(1);; Constitution of India - Article 226

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. P. Roy Barman, ;Ms. M. Deb Roy and ;Mr. B. Saha, Advs.

ORDER1. Heard Mr. P. Roy Barman, learned counsel for petitioner. Also heard Mr. U.B. Saha, learned senior Govt. Advocate, assisted by Mr. J. Majumdar, learned counsel the respondents.2. By this writ petition under Article 226 of...

Jaikant Mandal Vs. State of Jharkhand

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Criminal

Criminal Appeal (S.J.) No. 33 of 2005 ----------- Against the judgment of conviction dated 18.12.2004 and order of sentence dated 20.12.2004 passed by the learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Deoghar in connection with Sessions Trial No....

Jaikant Mandal Vs. State of Jharkhand

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Criminal

Criminal Appeal (S.J.) No. 33 of 2005 ----------- Against the judgment of conviction dated 18.12.2004 and order of sentence dated 20.12.2004 passed by the learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Deoghar in connection with Sessions Trial No....

The Divisional Manager United India Insurance Co Ltd Represented Throu ...

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Land Acquisition

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI ---- M.A. No. 317 of 2013 ----- The Divisional Manager, United India Insurance Company Ltd., Dhanbad Divisional Office, Rajhans Market Complex, Bank More, Distt-Dhanbad at present represented through...

Kali Mohan Sahaji and ors. Vs. State of Tripura and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Property

Hrishikesh Roy, J.1. With the consent of the learned Counsels representing the parties in these four proceedings, the matters are being taken up for analogous hearing since the substantial issue involved in each of the cases...

State of West Bengal Vs. Basanta Kumar Mondal

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Independence (Rights, Property and Liabilities) Order, 1947 - Schedule - Article 8; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908

Reported in : AIR1959Cal168

Advocate for Appellant : J. Majumdar, A.C.P. and ;Prodyut Kumar Banerjee, Advs.

P.N. Mookerjee, J.1. This appeal is by the State of West Bengal against a decree of the court below, decreeing the plaintiff-respondent's suit for recovery of a sum of Rs. 28,530/- on account of certain works...