Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: j m thakar · Page 1 of about 14 results (0.066 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 19 1992

C.J. Thakar (A. P.) Vs. Controller of Estate Duty

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-19-1992

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Estate Duty Act, 1953 - Sections 7

Reported in : [1995]214ITR323(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : L.S. Dewani, Adv.

V.A. Mohta, J.1. The following two questions are referred under section 64(1) of the Estate Duty Act, 1953, to this court at the behest of the accountable person : '(1) Whether the firm, 'Messrs. J. M....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 16 1963

Ghanshyam Das Vs. Regional Assistant Commissioner of Sales Tax, Nagpur

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-16-1963

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Central Provinces and Berar Sales Tax Act, 1947 - Sections 10(1), 10(3), 11(2) and 11-A

Reported in : AIR1964SC766; [1964]51ITR557(SC); 1964MhLJ574(SC); [1964]4SCR436; [1963]14STC976(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. J. M. Thakar

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeals Nos. 101 and 102 of 1961. Appeals from the order dated December 13, 1957, of the Madhya Pradesh High Court in Letters Patent Appeals Nos. 208 and 207 of 1956...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 03 1957

Jamnadas Daga Vs. the Commissioner of Income-tax, Madhya Pradesh and B ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-03-1957

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income-tax Act, 1922 - Sections 6, 10, 14, 14(2), 14(3), 14(4), 14(5), 16(1), 23(5), 24 and 24(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908; Finance Act, 1956

Reported in : AIR1958Bom239; (1957)59BOMLR1216; ILR1958Bom365; [1958]33ITR274(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : J.M. Thakar, Adv.

Tendolkar, J. 1. On this Reference the Tribunal has stated to us two questions raised at the instance of the assessee and one question raised at the instance of the Income-tax Commissioner. The assessee before us...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 12 1964

Tribuwandas Gulabchand and Brothers, Nagpur Vs. the State of Maharasht ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-12-1964

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Central Proviences and Berar Sales Tax Act, 1947 - Sections 23(1)

Reported in : [1965]16STC452(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : F.S. Nariman, Adv., i/b., ;J.M. Thakar, ;C.J. Thakar, ;H.M. Thakar and ;P.D. Thakar, Advs.

Abhyankar, J.1. This is a reference at the instance of the assessee made by the Sales Tax Tribunal under section 23(1) of the C.P. and Berar Sales Tax Act. 2. The question that is referred is...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 28 1964

Hirji Kalyanji Wadera Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-28-1964

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Central Proviences and Berar Sales Tax Act, 1947 - Sections 23(7) and 27A; ;Constitution of India - Article 286(1) and 286(2)

Reported in : [1965]16STC502(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : J.M. Thakar, ;H.M. Thakar, ;P.D. Thakar, ;C.J. Thakar and ;M.S. Gupta, Advs.

Abhyankar, J.1. This order will govern the disposal of all the three references made by the Sales Tax Tribunal, Bombay, in respect of the same assessee Shri Hirji Kalyanji, at whose instance identical questions of law...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 02 1969

Padgilwar Brothers Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Poona

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-02-1969

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 271, 271(1), 274, 274(1) and 274(2)

Reported in : [1971]81ITR258(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : J.M. Thakar, ;P.D. Thakar and ;C.J. Thakar, Advs.

Abhyankar, J. 1. The following questions said to arise out of the order of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal are referred to this court : '(1) In view of the concession of the assessee that penalty was...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 01 1969

Padgirwar Brothers Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Poona

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-01-1969

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 36 and 36(2)

Reported in : [1971]80ITR96(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : J.M. Thakar, ;P.D. Thakar and ;C.J. Thakar, Advs.

Abhyankar, J. 1. The question referred by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal is as follows : 'Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the amount advanced by the assessee firm to Shri V....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 17 1969

R.B. Bansilal Abirchand Spinning and Weaving Mills Vs. Commissioner of ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-17-1969

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 13

Reported in : [1970]75ITR260(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : J.M. Thakar and ;C.J. Thakar, Advs.

Abhyankar, J.1. This judgment will govern the references in all these cases. In all these references, there is one common question referred. In addition, there is a second question referred in Income-tax Reference No. 66/63 and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 13 1964

Jamnadas and anr. Vs. Commissioner of Wealth-tax, Bombay and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-13-1964

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Wealth Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 5, 14, 14(2), 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 21, 25(1) and 30

Reported in : [1965]56ITR648(Bom); 1965MhLJ55

Advocate for Appellant : J.M. Thakar, ;P.D. Thakar and ;C.J. Thakar, Advs.

K.K. Desai, J.1. In this petition under article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioners who are the joint executors appointed by the last will and testament dated April 8, 1959, of one Sohadradevi N. Daga, have...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 16 1963

Ghanshyamdas Chhotalal Vs. Sales Tax Officer and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-16-1963

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Central Provinces and Berar Sales Tax Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 11, 11(5), 22A, 22A(1) and 22A(2); Madhya Pradesh Sales-tax (Amendment) Act, 1953 - Sections 11(5) and 24; Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 47 and 49

Reported in : AIR1964MP161; [1964]15STC128(MP)

Advocate for Appellant : J.M. Thakar, ;H.M. Thakar and ;A.L. Halve, Advs.

Dixit, C.J. 1. By this application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution, the petitioner questions the legality of the assessment to sales tax made against a partnership firm doing business under the name and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial