Advanced Search Results

Narayan Jivangouda Patil and Another Vs. Puttabai and Others

Court : Privy Council

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Sir Thomas Strangman and S.P. Khambatta, for Appellants; J.M. Parikh and V.K. Krishna Menon, for Respondents. Solicitors for Appellants, T.L. Wilson and Co.; Solicitors for Respondents, Harold Shephard.

Sir Madhavan Nair: These are consolidated appeals from a judgment and two decrees of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay dated 14th January 1938, affirming a decree of the First Class Subordinate Judge of Dharwar...

Appa Trimbak Deshpande and Another Vs. Waman Govind Deshpande and Othe ...

Court : Privy Council

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : J.M. Parikh and R. Parikh, for Appellants. Solicitors for Appellants, Harold Shephard ; Solicitors for Respondents, Douglas Grant and Dold.

Sir George Rankin: This appeal has been brought in forma pauperis by the plaintiff and defendant 4, who are brothers. No one has appeared at the hearing to represent the respondents but Mr. Parikh has presented...

Lachhmi Sewak Sahu Vs. Ram Rup Sahu and Others

Court : Privy Council

Subject : Arbitration

Advocate for Appellant : J.M. Parikh and V.K. Krishna Menon, for Appellant; W. Wallach, for Respondents. Solicitors for Appellant, Harold Shephard; Solicitors for Respondents, Hy. S.L. Polak and Co.

Sir George Rankin: This appeal arises out of a partition suit brought on 3rd August 1928, in the Court of the Subordinate Judge of Azamgarh by one Ram Rup son of Ram Narain a Hindu governed...

Haji Maula Bux Vs. Abdul Latif

Court : Privy Council

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : AIR1939PC242

Advocate for Appellant : J.M. Parikh, for Appellant ; H.R. Abdul Majid, for Respondent. Solicitors for Appellant, Stanley Johnson and Allen ; Solicitors for Respondent, Hardcastle Sanders and Co.

Lord Macmillan: In this appeal the point for decision arises on a few simple facts. It appears that Mohammad Raza and Haji Maula Bux were in partnership under the firm name of Whitfield and Co. The...

Murugesam Pillai Vs. Minakshisundara Ammal

Court : Privy Council

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : J.M. Parikh, for Appellant. Solicitors for Appellant, G.K. Kannepalli.

LORD MAUGHAM: This is an appeal from an order of the High Court of Judicature at Madras dated 22nd August 1934, affirming the order of The Court of the Subordinate Judge of Cuddalore dated 22nd August...

Commissioner of Income-tax, Punjab, North-west Frontier and Delhi Prov ...

Court : Privy Council

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : J.Millard Tucker and W. Wallach, for Appellant; J.M. Parikh and R. Parikh, for Respondent. Solicitors for Appellant, Solicitor, India Office; Solicitors for Respondent, Stanley Johnson and Allen.

Sir George Rankin: This appeal arises out of a reference made to the High Court of Lahore under S.66, Income-tax Act (11 of 1922), in respect of the year of assessment 1937-38. The assessee is Dewan...

K.B. Mian Feroz Shah Vs. Firm R.S. Hira Singh Attar Singh and Others

Court : Privy Council

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : AIR1945PC136

Advocate for Appellant : J.M. Parikh and S.P. Khambatta, for Appellant; C.S. Rewcasile and S. Hyam, for Respondents. Solicitors for Appellant, T.L. Wilson and Co.; Solicitors for Respondents, Barrow Rogers and Nevill.

Lord Thankerton: Their Lordships have carefully listened to the grounds argued by counsel for the appellant and have come clearly to the conclusion that no valid leave was granted in this case because the requisite matter...

Mahabir Prasad and Another Vs. Syed Mustafa HusaIn and Others

Court : Privy Council

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : J.M. Parikh and R. Parikh, for Appellants; J.M. Pringle, for Respondents. Solicitors for Appellants, T.L. Wilson and Co., Solicitors for Respondents, Watkins and Hunter.

SIR GEORGE RANKIN: On 13th April 1918, one Mir Fida Husain, a Mussalman of the Asna-Ashari sect of the Shias died leaving him surviving a widow, six sons of whom two were minors, and three daughters...

Merla Ramanna Vs. Chelikani Jagannadha Rao and Others

Court : Privy Council

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : J.M. Parikh and R.A. Parikh, for Appellant ; Sir H. Cunliffe and P.V. Subba Row, for Respondents. Solicitors for Appellant, Lambert and White ; Solicitors for Respondents, Hy. S.L. Polak and Co.

Sir George Rankin: Dharma Rao and Kasibabu were brothers, the former being older than the latter by about 19 years. The appellant Merla Ramanna was a creditor of Dharma Rao in respect of a promissory note...

Atmaram Abhimanji Vs. Bajirao Janrao and Others

Court : Privy Council

Subject : Family

Advocate for Appellant : J.M. Parikh, for Appellants. Solicitor for Appellant, T.L. Wilson.

Sir Shadi Lal: The question of law, which arises in this appeal, is one of considerable importance and relates to the exact scope of the expression samanodaka as used in the Hindu law of inheritance. The...