Advanced Search Results

M. Gopalakrishna Vs. Divisional Security Commissioner, Railway Protect ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Service

Acts : Railway Protection Force Act, 1957 - Sections 9, 10, 17 and 21; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302, 304, 304A and 498A; Railway Protection Force Rules, 1987 - Rules 104.3, 146, 146(4), 146.2, 146.3, 146.4, 147, 148, 149, 153, 153.5, 155 and 156; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 232; Railway Protection Force Rules, 1957 - Rule 143; Rajasthan Service Rules - Rules 30A and 86(3); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 136, 226 and 311

Reported in : 2006(5)ALD704; 2006(5)ALT408

Advocate for Appellant : J.M. Naidu, Adv.

ORDERRamesh Ranganathan, J.1. Questioning the proceedings of the 1st respondent dated 20.01.1995, imposing on the petitioner the punishment of removal from service, as confirmed in proceedings dated 16.04.1996 of the 2nd respondent and further confirmed in...

Ch. Sreeramulu and anr. Vs. Chief Security Commissioner, Railway Prote ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Service

Acts : Railway Protection Force Rules, 1987 - Rules 96, 97 and 98

Reported in : 2008(6)ALD575

Advocate for Appellant : J.M. Naidu, Adv.

ORDERL. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. The petitioners were initially appointed as Constables in the Railway Protection Force (for short 'the Force'), in the year 1974. Both of them earned promotions to the posts of Naiks in the...

V. Emmanuel Vs. the Chief Security Commissioner, Railway Protection Fo ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Hyderabad

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Counsel for the Applicant : J.M. Naidu, Advocate. Counsel for the Respondents : M.C. Jacob, SC for Railways.

Mrs. Bharati Ray, Member (J) This application has been filed by the applicant seeking for the following relief: To declare the action of the 1st respondent in rejecting claim of the applicant for the post of...

Ch. Venkata Naidu, S/O. Late Challa Kondaiah Vs. the Principal Directo ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Hyderabad

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Counsel for the Applicant : J.M. Naidu, Advocate. Counsel for the Respondents : Mrs. N. Shakti, Addl. CGSC.

ORAL ORDER (As per Hon'ble Mr. Justice P. Lakshmana Reddy, Vice-Chairman) Heard Mr. J.M. Naidu, learned counsel for the applicant and Mrs. N. Shakti, learned standing counsel for the respondents. 2. This application is filed aggrieved...

S.A. Basha Vs. the Divisional Security Commissioner, Railway Protectio ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Service

Acts : Railway Protection Force Rules, 1987 - Rules 146.1, 146.4 and 147.1; Railway Services (Conduct) Rule, 1966 - Rule 3

Reported in : 2008(4)ALT422; [2008(119)FLR844]

Advocate for Appellant : J.M. Naidu, Adv.

ORDERL. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. The petitioner is working as Inspector in the Railway Protection Force. On 14.6.2006, he was arrested in Crime No. 7 of 2006, on the file of P.S. Yadgir of Karnataka State. On...

P. Venka Reddy S/O Venkateswar Reddy Vs. the Senior Divisional Securit ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 154; Prevention of Corruption Act - Sections 13(1) and 22; Evidence Act, 1872; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 243

Reported in : 2009(5)ALT644

Advocate for Appellant : J.M. Naidu, Adv.

ORDERNooty Ramamohana Rao, J.1. Both these writ petitions can be conveniently dealt with together and decided as they arise out of common set of facts and also raise common questions of law.2. The writ petitioner in...

Smt. Laxmibai, W/O. Late Babu Maruthy Vs. the General Manager, S.C. Ra ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Hyderabad

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Counsel for the Applicant : J.M. Naidu, Advocate. Counsel for the Respondents : Mr. V. Rajeswara Rao, SC for Railways.

ORAL ORDER (As per Hon'ble Mrs. Bharati Ray, Member (Juld.) ) Heard Mr. J.M. Naidu, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. V. Rajeswara Rao, learned standing counsel for the respondent. 2. It is the case...

A. Seshaiah Vs. Commandant, Central Industrial Security Force Unit

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : ServiceCivil

Acts : Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995 - Sections 33 and 47

Reported in : 2005(3)ALD766; 2005(3)ALT628; [2005(106)FLR1156]

Advocate for Appellant : J.M. Naidu, Adv.

L. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. Petitioner in W.P. No. 8127 of 2004 is the appellant in this writ appeal.2. The appellant was selected and appointed as Constable in Central Industrial Security Force (C.I.S.F), on 4-7-1991. After training,...

P. Kanakarajaratnam Vs. Deputy Inspector General, Rpf, South Central R ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1992(3)ALT490

Advocate for Appellant : J.M. Naidu, Adv.

ORDERSyed Shah Mohammed Quadri, J.1. The petitioner was appointed as Rakshak (subsequently designated as constable) in the South Central Railway Protection Force of Vijayawada Division in 1962. On the allegation of theft of 49 'bhogi shackle...

A. Saidulu Vs. the General Manager, Sc Rlys, Rail Nilayam and Others

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Hyderabad

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Counsel for the Applicant : Sri J.M. Naidu, Advocate. Counsel for the Respondents : Sri V. Rajeshwar Rao, SC for Rlys.

The applicant herein is aggrieved by the action of the Respondents in not releasing retirement benefits including leave salary, DCRG etc., by fixing his pay at Rs.7,600/- despite several representations. 2. The applicant joined Railways as...