Advanced Search Results
Udaipur Mineral Development Syndicate (P) Ltd. Vs. Asstt. Cit
Rajasthan
Dec-03-2002
Direct Taxation
[2004]136TAXMAN174(Raj)
N.M. Ranka and S.K. Singhal, for the Assessee J.K. Singhi, for the Revenue
ORDERLearned counsel for both the parties agree that these 10 writ petitions may be heard together and finally disposed of at this stage.2. On behalf of respondents Mr. J.K. Singhi raised preliminary objections regarding the maintainability...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCit Vs. Ramawatar Rajkumar
Rajasthan
Aug-02-2002
Direct Taxation
[2002]125TAXMAN41(Raj)
J.K. Singhi and Anuroop Singhi, for the Revenue
ORDEROn an application filed under section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), the Tribunal has referred the following question for our opinion :'Whether, on the facts and in the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAbdul Haq Ansari Vs. Ito and anr.
Rajasthan
Nov-01-2001
Direct Taxation
(2002)173CTR(Raj)90
S.M. Ali, for the Assessee J.K. Singhi, for the Revenue
Arun Madan, J.Heard learned counsel for the parties.The petitioner-firm by way of this writ petition, has challenged the assessment orders dated 31-1-1989 and 22-8-1989, passed by the Income Tax Officer, Jaipur and the Commissioner of Income...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Lt. Col. P.L. Bawa Vs. Lt. Col. Bhawani Singh
Rajasthan
Jan-24-2002
PropertyCivil
Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent & Eviction) Act, 1950 - Sections 13(1)
2002(2)WLC670; 2002(5)WLN35
J.K. Singhi, Adv.
Madan, J.1. P.L. Bawa (defendant) has challenged judgment & decree dated 23.2.99 in civil suit No. 249/95 passed by the Additional District Judge No.7, Jaipur City for his eviction.2. Facts complexed by the parties are epitomised...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSwaroop Chand Vs. Kanhaiya Lal
Rajasthan
Apr-11-1988
Property
2(1989)WLN(Rev)304
Shri. J.K. Singhi
P.C. Jain, J.1. This revision petition is directed against the order dated 23rd July, 1884, passed by the learned District Judge, Jhalawar in Civil Suit ho. 1 of 1979, whereby the learned District Judge dismissed the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRajasthan Jal Vikash Nigam Ltd. and anr. Vs. Shri Kailash Singh and Ot ...
Rajasthan
Jan-22-2001
Service
2001(1)WLC630; 2001(4)WLN249
J.K. Singhi, Adv.
ORDERLakshmanan, CJ.(1.) Heard Shri J.K. Singhi, learned counsel for the appellant and Shri A.K. Sharma, learned counsel for respondents No. 1 and 2.(2). This writ appeal has been filed against the judgment and order dated I3.7.2000:...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSwaroop Chand Vs. Kanhaiya Lal and ors.
Rajasthan
Apr-11-1988
Property
1988WLN(UC)209
Shri. J.K. Singhi
P.C. Jain, J.1. This revision petition is directed against the order dated 23rd July, 1984, passed by the learned District Judge, Jhalawar in Civil Suit No. 1 of 1979, whereby the learned District Judge dismissed the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskR.C. Lal Agrawal Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.
Rajasthan
Jul-15-2005
CivilService
Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 136 and 226; Rajasthan Service Rules, 1951 - Rules 169, 169(1), 169(2), 169(3), 170 and 244(1); Rajasthan Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1958 - Rules 16, 16(9), 18 and 34
RLW2005(3)Raj2189
J.K. Singhi, Adv.
Ajay Rastogi, J.1. By this writ petition petitioner has assailed order dt. 12.12.96 (Ann.23) whereby he has been inflicted with penalty of withholding of full pension for life in exercise of power under Rule 170 of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMangilal Vs. Smt. Nathi
Rajasthan
Jul-16-1975
Civil
1975WLN(UC)264
Mr. J.K. Singhi
J.P. Jain, J.1. This execution second appeal is by the judgment-debtor Mangilal and directed against the appellate order dated 19-4-74 of the Additional District Judge, Churu, by which he affirmed the orders of the execution court...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income Tax Vs. G.B.H. Exporters
Rajasthan
Aug-01-2003
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 256(2), 260 and 271(1)
(2003)184CTR(Raj)563; [2004]271ITR545(Raj)
J.K. Singhi, Adv.
S.K. Keshote, J. 1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. It is not in dispute that the Revenue in its application under Section 256(1) of the IT Act, 1961 (for short, 'the Act, 1961')...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »