Advanced Search Results
Sharad Yadav and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.
Delhi
Sep-06-1999
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120A and 120B; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 7, 11, 12, 13(1) and 13(2)
1999VIAD(Delhi)821; 82(1999)DLT13; 1999(51)DRJ371
Arun Jaitley and; Rajinder Singh, Sr. Advs.,; A.K. Bajpai
M.S.A. Siddiqui, J.1. The present revision petitions are directed against the order dated 1.8.1997 passed by Shri V.B. Gupta, Special Judge, Delhi in C.C. No. 44/96 directing to frame charges under Section 120-B, IPC and under...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSuresh Kumar vs.union of India & Anr
Delhi
Feb-06-2018
Land Acquisition
Mr. J.K. Jain
$~30 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:06. h February 2018 SURESH KUMAR LA.APP. 307/2017 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. J.K. Jain, Adv. (M-9811073458). versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMohd. Aslam and ors. Vs. Mohd. Ajmal and ors.
Delhi
Apr-16-2009
TenancyFamily
Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958; Mahammedan Law - Sections 40(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 151
(2009)155PLR38
J.K. Jain, Adv
Manmohan, J.1. Present revision petition has been filed against order dated 18th July, 2008 by virtue of which petitioners/tenants, leave to defend application has been dismissed.2. Mr. J.K. Jain, learned Counsel for petitioners submitted that Additional...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Rajesh Kumar JaIn Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Madhya Pradesh
Oct-19-2012
Education
Shri. J.K.Jain
1 W.P.No.17180 o”19. 10.2012 Shri J.K.Jain, counsel for the petitioner. Smt Sheetal Dubey, GA for the respondents. Heard on the question of admission. The petitioner/appellant/accused has filed this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskYogesh JaIn Vs. Satish Kumar Dhankar and ors.
Delhi
Dec-02-2013
Land Acquisition
Mr. J.K. Jain
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:2. d December, 2013. % + RFA5372013 YOGESH JAIN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. J.K. Jain, Adv. Versus SATISH KUMAR DHANKAR & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKalawati Vs. Shri Chand and anr.
Delhi
Dec-15-1987
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39, Rule 1; Punjab Preemption Act, 1913 - Sections 16
34(1988)DLT403
J.K. Jain,; C.L. Dhawan and; D.R. Thadani, Advs
H.C. Goel, J. (1) Smt. Kalawati, plaintiff/appellant, filed a suit against the defendants for a decree of possession by pre-emption of the house No. 4263, Gali Punjabiyan, Ansari Road, Darya Ganj, Delhi. The allegations of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGaon Sabha Budhela and anr. Vs. Dharam Singh
Delhi
Nov-23-1982
Property
Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954 - Sections 7(2) and 8; Delhi Land Reforms Rules, 1954 - Rule 170(6)
25(1984)DLT394
O.P. Tyagi and; J.K. Jain, Advs
Leila Seth, J. (1) This second appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 15th November, 1971 passed by Mr. C.D. Vashishta, Senior Sub Judge, Delhi, affirming the Judgment and decree of the trial court...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUttam Chand Vs. Canara Bank, Paharganj, New Delhi
Delhi
May-08-1996
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 22
1996IIIAD(Delhi)291; 63(1996)DLT303; 1996(38)DRJ160; (1996)114PLR13
J.K. Jain, Adv
R.C. Lahoti, J. (1) This is an appeal preferred by Smt.Phool Kumari, widow of one late Uttam Chand Jain, who was sole defendant in a civil suit.(2) On the death of defendant, the counsel appearing for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBalwant Singh and Another Vs. Saroj Kumari and Others
Punjab and Haryana
Sep-20-2013
Education
Shri. J.K.Jain
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR NO.5327 OF2012TH DATE OF DECISION : 20 SEPTEMBER2013Balwant Singh & another …. Petitioners Versus Saroj Kumari & others …. Respondents CORAM : HON’BLE Mr.JUSTICE L.N.MITTAL...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShri Tarachand JaIn Vs. Smt. Saroj Gupta
Delhi
May-25-2006
CivilProperty
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 151 - Order 22, Rule 10 - Order 23, Rule 3
130(2006)DLT617; 2006(90)DRJ527
J.K. Jain and; S.K. Verma, Advs
Manju Goel, J.1. This application under Section 151 CPC seeks recalling the collusive decree of 2.9.99 passed in CS(OS) 2121/1987. Before coming to the averments in the application, it is necessary to have a look at...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »