Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: j j bhatt · Page 1 of about 119 results (0.070 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 18 2011

M/S.J.K. Sons Vs. M/S.Parksons Games and Sports and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-18-2011

Subject : Intellectual Property

Advocate for Appellant : Mr.J.J. Bhatt; Mr.Ashish Kamat, Advs.

ORAL :-1. This is the defendants appeal against the order of the learned single Judge granting interlocutory reliefs in the respondents action for infringement and passing off.The learned judge restrained the appellants from infringing the respondents'...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 22 2009

Eight Capital Master Fund Ltd. and Others Vs. Securities and Exchange ...

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Decided on : Jul-22-2009

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. P. N. Modi, Advocate for Appellants. Mr. J. J. Bhatt, Senior Advocate with Ms. Harshada Nagare, Advocate for the Respondent.

Justice N.K. Sodhi, Presiding Officer Pennar Industries Limited is the target company. It is registered and incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 with its registered office in Hyderabad. Its shares are listed on the Bombay Stock...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 11 2012

H.J. Securities Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of India

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Decided on : May-11-2012

Subject : MRTP

Advocate for Appellant : For the Appellant: J.J. Bhatt with Pratham Masurekar, Advocates. For the Respondent: Kumar Desai with Mihir Mody, Mobin Shaikh, Advocates.

P.K. Malhotra 1. This order will dispose of two Appeals no. 76 and 81 of 2012 which arise out of identical facts. The appeals were heard together and, with the consent of the parties, are being...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 04 1994

Khurshed Sorabji Cooper Vs. Bombay Electric Supply and Transport Under ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-04-1994

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 26(1) and (6)

Reported in : AIR1995Bom79; 1995(1)BomCR483; (1994)96BOMLR670

Advocate for Appellant : J.J. Bhatt, Adv.

1. By this writ petition, the petitioner Khurshed Sorabji Cooper has challenged the supplementary bill dated 1 August, 1990 and the notice of disconnection dated 19 Nov. 1990 issued by the respondent -- The Bombay Electric...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 11 2007

Oberoi Constructions Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Worli Shivshahi Co-op. Housing

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-11-2007

Subject : PropertyArbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 9 and 11; MHADA Act; Development Control Regulation

Reported in : 2008(1)ARBLR106(Bom); 2007(5)BomCR758

Advocate for Appellant : J.J. Bhatt, Sr. Counsel, ;Biren Saraf and ;Amit Naik, Advs., i/b., Naik, Naik Iyer & Co.

Anoop V. Mohta, J.1. The petitioners have invoked the provision of Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short, 'Arbitration Act') based on a initialled draft of Memorandum of Understanding (MOU).2. The petitioners...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 11 2012

Nikhil Mansukhani Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of India

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Decided on : May-11-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : For the Appellant: J. J. Bhatt, Senior Advocate, Dr. S. D. Israni, Satyam S. Israni, Ms. Isha Gada, Advocates. For the Respondent: Shiraz Rustomjee, Senior Advocate with Mihir Mody, Mobin Shaikh, Advo

P. K. Malhotra 1. This order will dispose of two appeals no. 8 of 2012 and 196 of 2011 which arise out of a common order dated September 30, 2011 passed by the adjudicating officer of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 05 2009

M/S Reliance Infocomm Limited Versus Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited

Court : Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal TDSAT

Decided on : May-05-2009

Subject : Service Tax

Advocate for Appellant : FOR THE PETITIONERS: J.J. BHATT, SENIOR ADVOCATE WITH, MANALI SINGHAL, ANJALI CHANDRUKAR, SANTOSH SACHIN, ADVOCATES. FOR THE RESPONDENT: MANINDER SINGH, YOGINDER HANDOO, KUNAL SOOD, ADVOCATES.

In this case, the Petitioner is challenging the Circulars dated 12.6.2006 and 24.7.2007 issued by the Respondent - BSNL - claiming that these Circulars have the effect of unilaterally modifying certain clauses of the existing interconnect...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 16 2005

Brahaspati Financier Ltd. Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of India

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Decided on : Nov-16-2005

Subject : MRTP

Reported in : (2006)69SCL250SAT

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. J.J. Bhatt

1. The appellant Brahaspati Financier Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "the company") has preferred this appeal. The company challenges the order passed by SEBI dated 27.1.2003 in debarring the company for a period of five years....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 24 2014

Mrs. Krupa Sanjay Soni Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of India Sebi ...

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Decided on : Jan-24-2014

Subject : MRTP

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. J.J. Bhatt

Jog Singh, Member 1. The present appeal has been preferred by the two Appellants challenging the impugned order dated September 14, 2012 passed by the Respondent, imposing a penalty of Rs.30 lakh on each of them...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 29 2011

Narendra Ganatra Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of India and Others

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Decided on : Jul-29-2011

Subject : MRTP

Advocate for Appellant : For the Appellant: J. J. Bhatt, Advocate. For the Respondent: Dr. Poornima Advani, Ajay Khaire, Amrita Joshi, Advocates.

Per: P. K. Malhotra, Member 1. The appellant before us is said to be an investor carrying on trading and investment in equity shares of different companies at Mumbai. It is alleged against the appellant that...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial