Advanced Search Results
M/S.J.K. Sons Vs. M/S.Parksons Games and Sports and anr.
Mumbai
Mar-18-2011
Intellectual Property
Mr.J.J. Bhatt; Mr.Ashish Kamat, Advs.
ORAL :-1. This is the defendants appeal against the order of the learned single Judge granting interlocutory reliefs in the respondents action for infringement and passing off.The learned judge restrained the appellants from infringing the respondents'...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskH.J. Securities Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of India
SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT
May-11-2012
MRTP
For the Appellant: J.J. Bhatt with Pratham Masurekar, Advocates. For the Respondent: Kumar Desai with Mihir Mody, Mobin Shaikh, Advocates.
P.K. Malhotra 1. This order will dispose of two Appeals no. 76 and 81 of 2012 which arise out of identical facts. The appeals were heard together and, with the consent of the parties, are being...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKhurshed Sorabji Cooper Vs. Bombay Electric Supply and Transport Under ...
Mumbai
Mar-04-1994
Electricity
Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 26(1) and (6)
AIR1995Bom79; 1995(1)BomCR483; (1994)96BOMLR670
J.J. Bhatt, Adv.
1. By this writ petition, the petitioner Khurshed Sorabji Cooper has challenged the supplementary bill dated 1 August, 1990 and the notice of disconnection dated 19 Nov. 1990 issued by the respondent -- The Bombay Electric...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Oberoi Constructions Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Worli Shivshahi Co-op. Housing
Mumbai
Jul-11-2007
PropertyArbitration
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 9 and 11; MHADA Act; Development Control Regulation
2008(1)ARBLR106(Bom); 2007(5)BomCR758
J.J. Bhatt, Sr. Counsel, ;Biren Saraf and ;Amit Naik, Advs., i/b., Naik, Naik Iyer & Co.
Anoop V. Mohta, J.1. The petitioners have invoked the provision of Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short, 'Arbitration Act') based on a initialled draft of Memorandum of Understanding (MOU).2. The petitioners...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskEight Capital Master Fund Ltd. and Others Vs. Securities and Exchange ...
SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT
Jul-22-2009
Land Acquisition
Mr. P. N. Modi, Advocate for Appellants. Mr. J. J. Bhatt, Senior Advocate with Ms. Harshada Nagare, Advocate for the Respondent.
Justice N.K. Sodhi, Presiding Officer Pennar Industries Limited is the target company. It is registered and incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 with its registered office in Hyderabad. Its shares are listed on the Bombay Stock...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNikhil Mansukhani Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of India
SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT
May-11-2012
Land Acquisition
For the Appellant: J. J. Bhatt, Senior Advocate, Dr. S. D. Israni, Satyam S. Israni, Ms. Isha Gada, Advocates. For the Respondent: Shiraz Rustomjee, Senior Advocate with Mihir Mody, Mobin Shaikh, Advo
P. K. Malhotra 1. This order will dispose of two appeals no. 8 of 2012 and 196 of 2011 which arise out of a common order dated September 30, 2011 passed by the adjudicating officer of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S Reliance Infocomm Limited Versus Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited
Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal TDSAT
May-05-2009
Service Tax
FOR THE PETITIONERS: J.J. BHATT, SENIOR ADVOCATE WITH, MANALI SINGHAL, ANJALI CHANDRUKAR, SANTOSH SACHIN, ADVOCATES. FOR THE RESPONDENT: MANINDER SINGH, YOGINDER HANDOO, KUNAL SOOD, ADVOCATES.
In this case, the Petitioner is challenging the Circulars dated 12.6.2006 and 24.7.2007 issued by the Respondent - BSNL - claiming that these Circulars have the effect of unilaterally modifying certain clauses of the existing interconnect...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskZandu Pharmaceutical Works Ltd Vs. Devkumar Vaidya
Company Law Board CLB Mumbai
Aug-26-2008
Land Acquisition
V.V. Tulzapurkar, P. Samdani, N.M. Sakhardande, Rohan Rajadhyaksha, Varoon Chandra and Paras Parekh for the Petitioner. Sudipto Sarkar, S.N. Mukarjee, J.J. Bhatt, Manish Desai, Ms. Deepti Mohan, Rahul
1. The petitioner the Zandu Pharmaceutical Works Ltd. is a company incorporated on 10-12-1919 under Indian Companies Act, 1913 having its registered office at 70, Gokhale South, Dadar, Mumbai-400 025. The company is doing the business...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Askibrahim Ahmed Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of India and Others
SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT
Jun-30-2009
Land Acquisition
Mr. Chirag Balsara, Advocate with Ms. Amruta Ghane, Advocate for the Appellant. Dr. Poornima Advani, Advocate with Ms. Harshada Nagare, Advocate for the Respondent No. 1. Mr. J. J. Bhatt, Advocate for
Justice N.K. Sodhi, Presiding Officer (Oral) Parsoli Corporation Limited is a public limited company incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 and its shares are listed on the Bombay Stock Exchange Ltd. It will...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. Prashant J. Patel Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of India
SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT
Aug-17-2010
MRTP
For the Appellant: P. N. Modi, with Mr. Neville Lashkari, and Preeti Salaskar, Advocates. For the Respondent: J. J. Bhatt, Senior Advocate with Dr. Poornima Advani, and Omprakash Jha, Advocates.
Justice N.K. Sodhi, Presiding Officer The appellant before us is a stock broker who is a member of the National Stock Exchange of India Limited (NSE) and is registered with the Securities and Exchange Board of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »