Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: j i mehta · Page 1 of about 51 results (0.136 seconds)

Sep 09 1991

Hindustan Lever Limited, Vs. Nirma Private Limited, Ahmedabad

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-09-1991

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 2 and 29; Designs Act, 1911 - Sections 2(5); Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 15(2), 17, 48 and 51

Reported in : AIR1992Bom195

Advocate for Appellant : J.I. Mehta and;Virendra V. Tulzapurkar, Advs. i/b;M/s. Crawford Bayley & Co.

1. Hindustan Lever Ltd., has filed this suit against Nirma Private Ltd., seeking permanent injunction restraining the defendant from using in relation to soaps or detergent powder the impugned carton, a photograph of which is annexed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 30 1989

Nimesh K. Thakkar and Others Vs. Official Liquidator and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-30-1989

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 536

Reported in : 1990(1)BomCR639; (1989)91BOMLR395; [1991]70CompCas257(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : J.I. Mehta, Adv.

Sujata Manohar, J. 1. This judge's summoned is taken out by 28 applicants against the official liquidator of Sreeniwas Cotton Mills Ltd. in liquidation. 2. A company petition for winding up of sreeniwas Cotton Mills Ltd....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 16 1984

In Re: New Swadeshi Mills of Ahmedabad Ltd. and Manjushri Textiles

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Oct-16-1984

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 529(2)

Reported in : [1985]58CompCas86(Guj)

Advocate for Appellant : Gupta, official liquidator, party in person,; J.I. Mehta, Adv. for the financial institutions and;

Majmudar, J. 1. In this company application taken out by the official liquidator, he has prayed for certain directions against the concerned respondents which are nine in number calling upon them to release sufficient funds to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Try free for 7 days How AI Brief works

Jul 04 1991

Kishore Y. Patel and Others Vs. Patel Engineering Co. Ltd. and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-04-1991

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 186, 391, 397, 398 and 643; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rules 9 and 11; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 151 - Order 40, Rule 1

Reported in : AIR1992Bom114; [1994]79CompCas53(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : J.I. Mehta,;G.E. Vahanvati,;Mr. Aspi Chinoy and;Mr. Pratap, Advs., I/b;M/s. Mulla &;Mulla Cragie Blunt &;Caroe

ORDER1. The plaintiffs are shareholders of Patel Engineering Company Ltd., the 1st defendant company in this suit. The defendants Nos.2 to 8 are also the shareholders of the 1st defendant company. There are two groups of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 25 1986

Khotani Construction Co., Vs. Anwar Haji Alimohammed Cassum and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-25-1986

Subject : CivilLimitation

Acts : Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959 - Sections 6; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 17 - Schedule - Articles 58, 64 and 65; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 40, Rule 1; Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 - Sections 4 and 85; Mohamadan Law

Reported in : 1986(3)BomCR454

Advocate for Appellant : Anil A. Mehta, Adv., i/b., Kiran Sampat & Co. in A.O. 161/85, ;M.M. Sakhardande, ;N.M. Gunjalkar and ;Vasanti Bangera, Advs. in A.O. 162/85 and ;J.I. Mehta, ;S.P. Oke and ;D.S. Sawant, Advs. in A.

Sharad Manohar, J.1. These three Appeals from Order arise out of the judgement and order passed by the Bombay City Civil Court in the Notice of Motion taken out by the plaintiff in S.C. Suit No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 27 1992

Reserve Bank of India Vs. Bank of Credit and Commerce International (O ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-27-1992

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956, Sections 584; Banking Regulation Act, 1945; Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947, Sections 4(1)

Reported in : [1993]78CompCas207(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : J.I. Mehta, Adv.;S.V. Doijode, Adv.;N.G. Thakkar, Adv.

D.R. Dhanuka, J.1. The judge's summons raises the following questions for consideration of this Court : (1) Whether the amount of 'margin money' deposited by the applicant with the Bank of Credit and Commerce International (Overseas)...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 07 1990

Kamal V.M. AllaudIn and Etc. Etc. Vs. Raja Shaikh and Etc. Etc.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-07-1990

Subject : Family

Acts : Family Court's Act, 1984 - Sections 2, 3, 7, 8, 9, 10, 19, 20 and 28; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 2(4) and 9; Maharashtra Family Rules, 1987 - Rule 35; Family Courts (Court) Rules, 1988 - Rule 50; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973; Civil Court Act; Hindu Bigamous Marriages Act, 1946; Bombay Matrimonial (Transfer of Cases), Act, 1950 - Sections 4A, 19 and 35; Indian Divorce Act, 1945; Bombay City Civil Court Act, 1869 - Sections 3, 4, 5 and 12; Special Marriage Act, 1954; Foreign Marriage Act, 1969 - Sections 18(2); Hindu Marriage Act, 1956; Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 29(2); Indian Divorce Act, 1869; Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act, 1936 - Sections 18; Muslim Marriage Act, 1939 - Sections 15; General Clauses Act, 1897;

Reported in : AIR1990Bom299

Advocate for Appellant : Mrs. Anusuya Dutt,;M.L. Palan,;A.Y. Kazi,;M.L. Palan,;S.M. Kazi,;J.I. Mehta and;Janak Dwarkadas, Advs. i/b;Smetham Byrne Lambert and;Dubash and;D.B. Merchant and;V.J. Shah, Advs. i/b;Zaidy and Co.

ORDER1. These are Matrimonial Petitions and Suits which involve a common question of law, namely, whether these matters stand transferred or should be transferred to the Family Court, Bombay established the Family Courts Act, 1984 (Act...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 23 1976

Virendrasingh Bhandari and ors. Vs. Nandlal Bhandari and Sons P. Ltd.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-23-1976

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 397, 398, 433, 439 and 443(2); Companies Act, 1913 - Sections 162

Reported in : [1979]49CompCas532(MP)

Advocate for Appellant : G.I. Mehta and ;R.G. Waghmare, Advs. for company;A.K. Chitale, ;S.N. Kohli and ;R.C. Mukand, Advs.;N.A. Modi, ;Aziwala and ;S.R. Rhadnis, Advs.

J.S. Verma, J.1. This petition under Section 439 of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as ' the Act ') is primarily for a direction to wind up the company--' M/s. Nandlal Bhandari and Sons...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 18 1992

Sharad R. Khanna and ors. Vs. Industrial Credit and Investment Corp. o ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-18-1992

Subject : Contract

Acts : Presidency Towns Insolvency Act, 1909 - Sections 2, 9(2), 9(5) and 12(2); Presidency Towns Insolvency (Amendment) Act, 1978; Bombay Insolvency Rules, 1910 - Rule 52B(5); Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 132 and 140

Reported in : 1993(1)BomCR546

Advocate for Appellant : Aspy Chinoy, Adv. i/b., Mehta & Girdharilal

D.R. Dhanuka, J.1. By this Notice of Motion, the judgment debtor is seeking to set aside the Insolvency Notice No. N/108 of 1991 dated 27th August, 1991. The judgment debtors had impugned the validity of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 16 1976

In Re: Jaifabs Textile Mills Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-16-1976

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rule 338; Companies Act

Reported in : [1977]47CompCas434(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : C. Kotwal, Adv.

Aggarwal, J.1. The company had been wound up by my judgment and order dated 6th/9th February, 1976. As regards the question of costs of the company, the question was left open in order to enable to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

Try free for 7 days

‹ Prev
1
2
3
4
5
6
Next ›
Last »

Advanced Search Results

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.