Advanced Search Results

American Express International Banking Corporation Vs. Cit

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2002)177CTR(Bom)442

Advocate for Appellant : J.D. Mistry i/b Crawford Bayley & Co., for the Assessee R.V Desai, for the Revenue

S.H. Kapadia, J.The above three references are made by Tribunal, Bombay, under section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter, for the sake of brevity, referred to as 'the Act'). Since they raise common question...

American Express International Banking Corporation Vs. Commissioner of ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income-Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 18, 28, 37, 40A(5), 44C and 145; Income-Tax Rules, 1962 - Rule 3

Reported in : 2003(3)BomCR193; [2002]258ITR601(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : J.D. Mistry, Adv. i/b., Crawford Bayley and Co.

S.H. Kapadia, J.1. The above three references are made by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Bombay, under Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter, for the sake of brevity, referred to as 'the Act'). Since they...

Ramdas Maneklal Gandhi Vs. the Union of India and Another

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 35 and 148; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1999(4)ALLMR539; 2000(1)BomCR581; (2000)161CTR(Bom)398; [2000]241ITR437(Bom); 2000(2)MhLj74

Advocate for Appellant : J.D. Mistry, ;D.P. Desai i/b. ;M.K. Ambalal & Co., Advs.

ORDERDr. B.P. Saraf, J.1. By this writ petition, the petitioner seeks to challenge the notice dated 29th March, 1988 issued by the Income-tax Officer under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ('Act') for the assessment...

Colour Chem Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 32, 35B, 35B(1), 37(1), 40A(5) and 144B; Income Tax Rules, 1962

Reported in : (1996)132CTR(Bom)210; [1997]225ITR164(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : J.D. Mistry, Adv.;Balasubramaniam and ;P.S. Jetly, Advs.

Dr. B.P. Saraf, J.1. By this reference under s. 256(1) of the IT Act, 1961 ('Act') made at the instance of the assessee, the Tribunal, Bombay Bench, Bombay has referred the following questions of law to...

L.M. Devare, Liquidator of Bank of Karad Ltd. (In Liquidation) Vs. Com ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 28

Reported in : [1998]234ITR813(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : J.D. Mistry, Adv., i/b., ;I. Dalal and Co.

A.Y. Sakhare, J.1. By this reference under Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (for short 'the Act'), the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal at the instance of the assessee has referred the following question of law to...

Geoffrey Manners and Co. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961, Sections 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 35B, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 40A and 40A(5); Income Tax Rules, 1962 - Rule 3

Reported in : (1996)136CTR(Bom)169; [1996]221ITR695(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : J.D. Mistry, Adv., i/b., ;Dhru & Co.

Dr. B.P. Saraf, J. 1. By this reference, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (Tribunal) has referred the following questions of law to this Court under s. 256(1) of the IT Act, 1961, for our opinion : At...

Smt. Vimla Devi G. Maheshwari and anr. Vs. D.D. Mohindra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : PropertyDirect Taxation

Acts : Income - Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 269UD; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2004(3)ALLMR317; 2004(5)BomCR263; (2004)190CTR(Bom)306; [2004]268ITR102(Bom); 2004(4)MhLj58

Advocate for Appellant : J.D. Mistri, Adv.

R.M. Lodha J.1. In respect of the immovable property being Flat No. 16, 4th Floor, 'D' Road, Churchgate, Bombay, owned by respondent No. 3, Shri Nandlal G. Kejriwal, the petitioners entered into an agreement on July...

Hind Condensors Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 207, 208, 209, 210, 210(1), 212, 212(3A), 215, 217(1A)

Reported in : [1998]230ITR830(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : J.D. Mistry, Adv. i/b., ;N.A. Dalvi, Adv.

Dr. B.P. Saraf, J.1. By this reference under Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, at the instance of the assessee, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal has referred the following question of law to this court for...

Jai Nadershah Karani and anr. Vs. C.M. Betgeri, Commissioner of Income ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 269UD(1); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : (2007)208CTR(Bom)287; [2007]290ITR594(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : J.D. Mistri, Adv., i/b., ;Little and Co.

H.L. Gokhale, J.1. Heard Mr. J.D. Mistri for the petitioners, Mr. Asokan appears for respondent Nos. 1 to 4 and Mr. Murlidharan appears for respondent No. 5.2. This writ petition filed under Article 226 of the...

Rainbow Agri Industries Ltd. Vs. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 9, Rule 13; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 253; Income Tax (Appellate Tribunal) Rules, 1963 - Rule 24

Reported in : 2004(2)BomCR741; (2003)185CTR(Bom)482; [2004]266ITR38(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : J.D. Mistry and ;A.K. Jasani, Advs.

V.C. Daga, J.1. Rule returnable forthwith. Mr. R.V. 'Desai, Sr. Counsel for the Revenue waives service on behalf of the respondents. By consent of parties petition is heard on merits.2. The case of the petitioners in...