Advanced Search Results

N.K.P. Salve Institute of Medical Science and Research Centre Vs. the ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 142 and 226

Reported in : AIR2005Bom18; 2004(4)ALLMR597; 2005(1)BomCR659

Advocate for Appellant : V.R. Manohar, Senior Counsel and ;S.V. Manohar, Adv. in Writ Petition No. 5805 of 2004, ;T.R. Subramaniam and ;Firdus Pooniwala, Advs., i/b., Hariani & Co. in Writ Petition No. 1750 of 2004, ;V.R.

Dalveer Bhandari, C.J.I1. Managements of privately owned professional collages imparting education in Health Science disciplines are before the Court in proceedings under Article 226 of the Constitution. They are aggrieved by the determination of fees made...

Sun N Sand Hotel Limited Vs. V.V. Kamat, Huf

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 37, Rule 2

Reported in : AIR2003Bom168; 2003(1)ALLMR462; II(2003)BC121; 2003(2)BomCR37; (2003)1BOMLR625; 2003(3)MhLj932

Advocate for Appellant : Ashpi Chinoy, ;P.K. Samdani, ;Ashok Paranjape and ;Sandhya Nair, Advs., i/b., Wadia Ghandhy & Co.

S.J. Vazifdar, J.1. The suit is filed as a Summary Suit under Order XXXVII Rule 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, to recover a sum of Rs. 5,04,26,250/- towards principal and interest upto 15th...

Bussa Overseas and Properties P. Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (1997)(70)LC517Tri(Mum.)bai

1. These two appeals have been filed against the order dated 21.6.1996 passed by the Commissioner, Central Excise II, Mumbai by which the Commissioner has confirmed the demand of Rs. 2,26,08,2147- in respect of 29 consignments...

Kwality Ice Creams (India) Ltd. Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Subject : Direct Taxation

1. The Appellant, a public limited company, had invested Rs.2 crores in three open ended mutual fund schemes providing tax benefits on capital gains. Out of the said investment, one crore rupees was invested in Templeton...

Gopal Bhagwandas Ahuja Vs. Jagdish Bhagwandas Ahuja and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Oral Judgment: Plaintiff who has filed suit for declaration that the plaintiff is entitled to 1/10th share of the assets and properties set out in the plaint, and for partition of the said properties by metes...

Punjab State Industrial Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of India

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Anil K. Aggarwal

"(1) That the exemption granted by SEBI vide its order dated 7th March, 2001 to the Acquirer Company for acquiring 50.7296 shareholding of DSM in the Target Company be set aside. (2) That the Target Company...

Bombay Metropolitan Transport Corporation Ltd. Vs. Employees of Bmtc ( ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 25L and 25O; Constitution of India - Articles 21, 39A and 41; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 425, 433, 434(1), 443(2), 445, 445(3), 530 and 617

Reported in : [1990]69CompCas465(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : J.D. Dwarkadas,;N.G. Thakkar and;S.R. Kothari, Advs.

S.N. Variava, J.1. This petition for winding up is by the company itself on the grounds set out in section 433(a), (e) and (f) of the Companies Act, 1956, i.e., on the footing that a special...

Bajaj Tempo Limited and Another Vs. the Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Other Taxes

Acts : Maharashtra Municipalities Act, 1965 - Sections 2(50); Maharashtra Municipalities Octroi Rules, 1968 - Rule 3; Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 - Sections 3(2), 95, 97, 105, 127, 149 and 493

Reported in : 1998(1)ALLMR503; 1998(1)BomCR745

Advocate for Appellant : J.D. Dwarkadas, ;N.H. Seervai and ;Vaibhav V. Joglekar, Advs., i/by M/s. Kanga & Co.

ORDERA.P. Shah, J.1. The first petitioner Bajaj Tempo Limited (hereinafter called the 'Company') is a company registered under the Companies Act and the second petitioner is its Managing Director. The Company is carrying on business of...

In Re: Sharp Industries Limited

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 391, 391(1) and 391(6); Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 22 and 25; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rule 71; Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 40

Reported in : [2005]123CompCas60(Bom); (2005)3CompLJ221(Bom); [2005]60SCL297(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : J.D. Dwarkadas and ;Jal Andhyarujina, Advs. i/b., Vijay Sharma, Adv.;D.D. Madon, ;B. Collabawala and ;K.B. Irani, Advs. i/b., Madekar and Co.;M.P. Rao, Adv. i/b., Bharat and Shah and Co.;J.M. Sidhwa a

S.J. Vazifdar, J.1. For convenience I will refer to the applicant in Company Application No. 339 of 2004 as the company and to the applicants in the other company applications as the applicants.2. Company Application No....

In Re: Scheme of Compromise/Arrangement Between Sharp Industries Limit ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 391(6); Negotiable Instruments Act - Sections 138; Company Court Rules, 1959 - Rule 71

Reported in : II(2005)BC373; 2005(1)BomCR13

Advocate for Appellant : J.D. Dwarkadas and ;Jal Andhyarujina, Advs., i/b., Vijay Sharma, Adv., ;D.D. Madon, ;B. Collabawala and ;K.B. Irani, Advs., i/b., Madekar & Co. ;M.P. Rao, Adv., i/b., Bharat & Shah & Co. ;

Vazifdar S.J., J.1. For convenience I will refer to the applicant in Company Application No. 339 of 2004 as the company and to the applicants in the other Company Applications as the Applicants.2. Company Application No....