Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: j d ajmera · Page 1 of about 43 results (0.049 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 07 2006

Ajitbhai Ismailbhai Pinjara Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Mar-07-2006

Subject : Criminal

Acts : The Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 8, 21 and 41 to 57; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 54

Reported in : (2006)3GLR2074

Advocate for Appellant : J.D. Ajmera, Adv. for Appellant 1

C.K. Buch, J.1. This is an appeal against the judgment and order of conviction passed by ld. Special Judge, Surendranagar in Special Case No. 1/1998 on 17.09.1999 whereby the appellant-original accused has been held guilty of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 03 1996

Arasuri Ambajimata Mandir Devsthan Trust Vs. Joitabhai A. Patel, Shram ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jul-03-1996

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 - Sections 2 and 4

Reported in : (1997)2GLR1187; (1998)IIILLJ1129Guj

Advocate for Appellant : J.D. Ajmera, Adv.

M.R. Calla, J.1. The respondent joined the services of the petitioner trust, i.e., Arasuri Ambajimata Mandir Devsthan Trust on September 23, 1974 and he was then appointed as Special Development Officer with effect from April 1,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 29 1983

Patel Vinubhai Nathubhai Vs. Thakkar Jayantilal Chhaganlal

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Apr-29-1983

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 7, Rule 1 - Order 20, Rule 15; Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 40

Reported in : AIR1984Guj86; (1983)2GLR1326

Advocate for Appellant : J.D. Ajmera, Adv.

1. In this second appeal the substantial question of law as framed by this court is that when the suit is for a specified amount due at the foot of partnership accounts, whether a decree for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 30 2000

Shantaben Gordhandas Bhatt Vs. Gujarat State Road Transport Corporatio ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Nov-30-2000

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act - Sections 163-A

Reported in : 2002ACJ1714

Advocate for Appellant : J.D. Ajmera, Adv.

M.R. Calla, J.1. Both these First Appeals filed by the original claimants are directed against the judgment and award dated 12th August 1991 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Main), Rajkot whereby several M.A.C. Petitions...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 08 2002

Sunilbhai Pranbhai Khara Vs. Rukshmaniben Girdharlal Mehta and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Oct-08-2002

Subject : Trusts and SocietiesCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 115 - Order 14, Rule 2; Gujarat Co-operative Societies Act, 1961 - Sections 96, 96(1) and 166;

Reported in : (2003)2GLR1428

Advocate for Appellant : J.D. Ajmera, Adv.

K.A. Puj, J.1. The present Civil Revision Application is filed against the order dated 25-2-2002 passed by the learned Civil Judge (J.D.), Rajkot, in application below Exh. 98 in Special Civil Suit No. 202 of 1998,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 06 2003

Jetalben Jayantibhai Parmar and ors. Vs. Gujarat Secondary and Higher ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Aug-06-2003

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 41 and 226

Reported in : (2003)3GLR2396

Advocate for Appellant : J.D. Ajmera, Adv. Special Civil Application Nos. 7962 to 7965, 8202 and 8312 of 2003; V.H. Desai, Adv

K.A. Puj, J. 1. Following Special Civil Applications are filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the cancellation of result of the subjects of the Post Basic Stream of Standard 12th as mentioned...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 28 1995

Regional Provident Fund Commissioner Vs. Continental Textile Mills Ltd ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Apr-28-1995

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 - Sections 14, 14(1A) and 14(1B)

Reported in : (1996)2GLR693; (1998)IIILLJ1016Guj

Advocate for Appellant : J.D. Ajmera, Adv.

K.J. Vaidya, J.1. This group of24 Criminal Revision Applications for the enhancement of sentence at the instance of Regional Provident Fund Commissioner Ahmedabad is directed against the impugned judgments and orders of conviction and sentence dated...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 30 1990

Chandrakant Bhailal Patel Vs. T.V. Krishnamurthy and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jul-30-1990

Subject : Property

Acts : Gujarat Panchayats Act, 1962 - Sections 96 and 98; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115

Reported in : AIR1991Guj63

Advocate for Appellant : J.D. Ajmera, Adv.

ORDER1. The petitioner challenges the orders passed by the respondents Nos. I and 2 at Annexures C and D respectively on the ground that they are without jurisdiction and these authorities could not have refused the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 01 2004

Poul Cyril Parmar Vs. District Education Officer

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Mar-01-2004

Subject : Service

Acts : Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952

Reported in : (2004)2GLR482

Advocate for Appellant : Kirit J. Macwan, Adv. for Petitioner Nos. 1-6 in Special Civil Application No. 9454 of 2000,; J.D. Ajmera

Akshay H. Mehta, J.1. As these six petitions involve a common question of fact, pertaining to interpretation of the direction given by the Division Bench of this Court (Coram : M.R. Calla, N.G. Nandi, JJ.) vide...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 06 1999

Bharatkumar Chimanlal Chauhan Vs. Nuclear Power Corporation Ltd. and o ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Oct-06-1999

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16

Reported in : (2000)3GLR1891

Advocate for Appellant : M.S. Rao, Adv.

ORDER1. Rule. Service of rule is waived by Mr. J. D. Ajmera for respondent No. 1. 2. Draft amendment allowed. Heard learned Counsel for the parties. The petitioner challenges non-consideration of his case for promotion firstly...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial