Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: j c bhat · Page 1 of about 7 results (0.184 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 07 1965

S.P. JaIn Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-07-1965

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act 1956 - Sections 10B, 10C, 37, 388B, 388E, 396, 397, 398, 399, 400, 401, 402, 403 and 643; ;Supreme court Rules, 1959 - Rule 21

Reported in : [1966]36CompCas712(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : J.C. Bhat, ;M.R. Mody and ;R.J. Bhat, Advs.

1. This appeal arises out of an order of the Companies Tribunal, New Delhi (Camp, Bombay), dismissing Application No. 37 of 1965 Union of India v. Benett Coleman & Co. Ltd. (1965) 35 Comp. Cas. 673...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 08 2012

Indian Performing Right Society Ltd. Vs. Aditya Pandey and Others

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-08-2012

Subject : Education

PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J. 1. What we commonly understand as a song consists of three elements: lyrics, music and singing. There are three players. The lyricist who provides the words; the musician who provides the music score;...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 14 1977

Indian Performing Right Society Ltd. Vs. Eastern Indian Motion Picture ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-14-1977

Subject : Media and CommunicationIntellectual Property Rights

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 13, 13(1), 14, 14(1), 17, 18, 19 and 33

Reported in : AIR1977SC1443; (1977)2SCC820; [1977]3SCR206

Jaswant Singh, J.133(1)Whether in view of the provisions of the Copyright Act, 1957, an existing and future right of music...composer, lyricist is capable of assignment and whether the producer of a cinematograph film can defeat the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 28 1973

Nanavati and Co. (Pvt.) Ltd. Vs. R.C. Dutt and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-28-1973

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 2, 2(50), 6, 36, 237, 294, 294(5), 326, 326(2) and 637; Company Law

Reported in : [1975]45CompCas91(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : J.C. Bhat, Adv.

Deshmukh, J. 1. This is an appeal by the original petitioners, who are a private limited company, against the order of dismissal of their writ petition by the learned single judge of this court. The facts...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 18 1954

Jehangir Bomanji and ors. Vs. C.D. Gaikwad

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-18-1954

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 6, 9, 11, 12, 12(2), 18, 18(1) and 18(2); Indian Contract Act

Reported in : AIR1954Bom419; (1954)56BOMLR478; ILR1954Bom1015

Advocate for Appellant : J.C. Bhat, Adv. and ;Gagrat & Co.

Chagla, C.J. 1. The petitioners are the present trustees of a deed of trust dated 28-3-1928, and as such trustees they owned certain land at Goregaon admeasuring about 24 acres. In June 1948 Government issued a...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 17 1953

Maneklal Amratlal Vs. Collector of Ahmedabad

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-17-1953

Subject : Property

Acts : Bombay Land Requisition Act, 1948 - Sections 5, 5(1) and 5(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908

Reported in : AIR1954Bom235; (1953)55BOMLR992; ILR1954Bom473

Advocate for Appellant : J.C. Bhat, ;R.P. Bhat, Advs. and Purnanand and Co.

Chagla, C.J.1. By this petition an order of requisition made by the Collector of Ahmedabad on May 15, 1953, is being challenged by the petitioner. The property requisitioned is a stall in the vegetable market at...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 30 1979

Krishnaraj Jamnadas Modi Vs. Colaba Land Co-operative Housing Society ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-30-1979

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 13(1); Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Rules, 1961 - Rule 10

Reported in : (1979)81BOMLR307; 1979MhLJ841

Advocate for Appellant : J.C. Bhat, ; H.C. Tumara and ; A.G. Parikh, Advs.

P.B. Sawant, J.1. By this petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution, the petitioners seeks to challenged under the order dated 12-10-1976 passed by the Appeal Court of the Small Causes Court, Bombay in proceedings...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial