Advanced Search Results
S.P. JaIn Vs. Union of India and ors.
Mumbai
Oct-07-1965
Company
Companies Act 1956 - Sections 10B, 10C, 37, 388B, 388E, 396, 397, 398, 399, 400, 401, 402, 403 and 643; ;Supreme court Rules, 1959 - Rule 21
[1966]36CompCas712(Bom)
J.C. Bhat, ;M.R. Mody and ;R.J. Bhat, Advs.
1. This appeal arises out of an order of the Companies Tribunal, New Delhi (Camp, Bombay), dismissing Application No. 37 of 1965 Union of India v. Benett Coleman & Co. Ltd. (1965) 35 Comp. Cas. 673...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIndian Performing Right Society Ltd. Vs. Aditya Pandey and Others
Delhi
May-08-2012
Education
PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J. 1. What we commonly understand as a song consists of three elements: lyrics, music and singing. There are three players. The lyricist who provides the words; the musician who provides the music score;...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIndian Performing Right Society Ltd. Vs. Eastern Indian Motion Picture ...
Supreme Court of India
Mar-14-1977
Media and CommunicationIntellectual Property Rights
Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 13, 13(1), 14, 14(1), 17, 18, 19 and 33
AIR1977SC1443; (1977)2SCC820; [1977]3SCR206
Jaswant Singh, J.133(1)Whether in view of the provisions of the Copyright Act, 1957, an existing and future right of music...composer, lyricist is capable of assignment and whether the producer of a cinematograph film can defeat the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Nanavati and Co. (Pvt.) Ltd. Vs. R.C. Dutt and ors.
Mumbai
Feb-28-1973
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 2, 2(50), 6, 36, 237, 294, 294(5), 326, 326(2) and 637; Company Law
[1975]45CompCas91(Bom)
J.C. Bhat, Adv.
Deshmukh, J. 1. This is an appeal by the original petitioners, who are a private limited company, against the order of dismissal of their writ petition by the learned single judge of this court. The facts...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJehangir Bomanji and ors. Vs. C.D. Gaikwad
Mumbai
Jan-18-1954
Property
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 6, 9, 11, 12, 12(2), 18, 18(1) and 18(2); Indian Contract Act
AIR1954Bom419; (1954)56BOMLR478; ILR1954Bom1015
J.C. Bhat, Adv. and ;Gagrat & Co.
Chagla, C.J. 1. The petitioners are the present trustees of a deed of trust dated 28-3-1928, and as such trustees they owned certain land at Goregaon admeasuring about 24 acres. In June 1948 Government issued a...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskManeklal Amratlal Vs. Collector of Ahmedabad
Mumbai
Aug-17-1953
Property
Bombay Land Requisition Act, 1948 - Sections 5, 5(1) and 5(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908
AIR1954Bom235; (1953)55BOMLR992; ILR1954Bom473
J.C. Bhat, ;R.P. Bhat, Advs. and Purnanand and Co.
Chagla, C.J.1. By this petition an order of requisition made by the Collector of Ahmedabad on May 15, 1953, is being challenged by the petitioner. The property requisitioned is a stall in the vegetable market at...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKrishnaraj Jamnadas Modi Vs. Colaba Land Co-operative Housing Society ...
Mumbai
Jan-30-1979
Trusts and Societies
Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 13(1); Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Rules, 1961 - Rule 10
(1979)81BOMLR307; 1979MhLJ841
J.C. Bhat, ; H.C. Tumara and ; A.G. Parikh, Advs.
P.B. Sawant, J.1. By this petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution, the petitioners seeks to challenged under the order dated 12-10-1976 passed by the Appeal Court of the Small Causes Court, Bombay in proceedings...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›