Advanced Search Results

Prabhatsinh Samatsinh Vs. D.S.P and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Service

Acts : Evidence Act; Service Rules; Gujarat Civil Services (Conduct) Rules, 1971 - Rules 3, 3(1) and 4(1)

Reported in : (2009)3GLR2499

Advocate for Appellant : J.A. Adeshra, Adv. for Petitioner 1

Akil Kureshi, J.1. Petitioner has challenged an order of his removal dated 28.1.88 passed by the Disciplinary Authority and upheld by the Appellate Authority.2. Briefly stated, facts of the case are:The petitioner was employed as Armed...

A.C. Shah and ors. Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Reported in : (1993)2GLR1829

S.D. Shah, J. 1. A perennial dispute of inequality of opportunity in the matter of promotion to the post of Deputy Engineer in the Electrical Engineering Branch of Public Works Department of the State of Gujarat...

Mahendrasinh Dilavarsinh Raj and Another Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Land Acquisition

1. Rule. Mr.P.S.Champaneri, learned Assistant Solicitor General of India, waives service of notice of Rule for respondent No.1, Mr. Rakesh Gupta, learned advocate for M/s. Trivedi and Gupta, waives service of notice of Rule for respondents...

Sarpanch, Meghraj Gram Panchayat Vs. President, Taluka Panchayat and o ...

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Civil

Acts : Gujarat Panchayats Act, 1993 - Sections 206(2); Gujarat Panchayats Act, 1961 - Sections 183(2) and 1863(3)

Reported in : (2002)3GLR166

Advocate for Appellant : J.A. Adeshra, Adv.

Jayant Patel, J. 1. The petitioner-Gram Panchayat has approached this Court for giving appropriate direction to the Taluka Panchayat to refund 40% of the gross collection of the cess made by it for the year 1995-96,...

Branch Manager, Vijaya Bank Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 2, 133, 133(1), 138, 138(1), 139, 268, 310 and 397

Reported in : 1999CriLJ946; (1998)2GLR1004

Advocate for Appellant : J.A. Adeshra, Adv.

ORDERN.N. Mathur, J. 1. This criminal revision application under Section 397 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is directed against the order dated 27-6-1995 passed by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Ahmedabad city in case No. 2315 of...

A.S. Sindhi Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India, 1950

Reported in : (2000)GLR579

Advocate for Appellant : J.A. Adeshra, Adv.

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Thispetition for quashing and setting aside the departmentalinquiry instituted against the petitioner videchargesheet dated 27/9/94 has been filed in the following circumstances.The facts about the petitioner's progress in the...

State Bank of India Vs. Engg. Majdoor Sangh

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 235 to 251, 391, 391(1), 391(2), 394 and 643; Company Court Rules, 1959 - Rules 9 and 80; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 151

Reported in : (2001)2GLR1032

Advocate for Appellant : R.M. Desai,; Ashok L. Shah,; J.A. Adeshra and;

M.S. Shah, J. 1. In all these applications the applicants have prayed for review of this Court's order dated 23-9-1997 passed by this Court (Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. D. Dave) in Company Petition No. 224...

Malay Babulal Shah Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16

Reported in : (2000)2GLR123

Advocate for Appellant : J.A. Adeshra, Adv.

R. Balia, J.1. The petitioner challenges his supersession by hisjuniors in pursuance of the recommendations made by theDepartmental Promotion Committee (for short, 'the DPC')which met on 15.12.1997 for considering the case ofpersons eligible for promotion to...

Jignishaben Jasavant Sinh Parmar Vs. Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel Institut ...

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR2005Guj159

Advocate for Appellant : J.A. Adeshra, Adv. for Petitioner No. 1

M.R. Shah, J.1. Rule. Shri Dhaval Dave, Learned Advocate waives service of rule on behalf of the respondent. With the consent of the parties, the matter is taken up for final hearing today. 2. In this...