Advanced Search Results
Shri Nath Vs. State of Rajasthan
Rajasthan
Dec-09-1980
Criminal
1980WLN(UC)536
S.N. Deedwania, J.1. Petitioner Shrinath has filed these three criminal revisions against the judgments of learned Additional Sessions Judge No. 2, Jodhpur, whereby conviction and sentence awarded to him by learned Assistant Sessions Judge, Jodhpur in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Askinder Nath Modi Vs. Nandram and ors.
Rajasthan
Oct-07-1952
PropertyLimitation
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 2, Rule 2(3) - Order 8, Rule 2; Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Article 142
AIR1953Raj59
Sumerchand, Adv.
Bapna, J.1. This is a first appeal by the plaintiff in a suit for recovery of possession.2. One Nandram and his brother Achlu mortgaged two houses mentioned as A and B in the schedule annexed to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Motor and General Finance Ltd. Vs. Milap Bus Service and anr.
Delhi
Jul-01-1996
ArbitrationCivil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 19, Rule 1
63(1996)DLT176; (1996)114PLR25
U.N. Sharma and; Kanwaljit Dhir, Advs
Lokeshwar Prasad, J.(1) This Order will dispose the application filed by Shri Gian Singh, respondent No. 2 under Section 151 CPC. The facts relevant for the disposal of the above mentioned application briefly stated are that...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Baga Bharti Vs. Sarkar
Rajasthan
Oct-27-1949
Criminal
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 138 and 145; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 367; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 97
AIR1950Raj10
Inder Nath Modi, Adv.
1. These are two appeals by the accused Baga Bharti, one filed by him from jail and the other through his learned counsel Mr. Indernath Modi, and this judgment will dispose of both of them as...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBal Chand Vs. Bheron Dan and ors.
Rajasthan
Aug-14-1950
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 47, Rule 1
AIR1951Raj85
Indernath Modi, Adv.
ORDERGupta, J.1. This is an appln. for review of the judgment of this Ct. dated 24-1-1950, passed in S. A. No. 57 of 1948 in which the applicants propose, to rely mainly on a ruling of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJetharam and ors. Vs. Hazarimal
Rajasthan
Aug-28-1951
FamilyProperty
Hindu Law; Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 35 and 35(3); Specific Relief Act, 1877 - Sections 12
AIR1952Raj28
Indernath and; Utsavlal, Adv.
Bapna, J. 1. This is an appeal against the judgment and decree of the High Court of the former covenanting State of Jodhpur, and, was filed before the Ijlas-i-khas and. transferred to this Court by virtue...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Radheshyam Motilal Khandelwal and ...
Mumbai
Sep-12-1973
Insurance
Insurance Act, 1938 - Sections 2(6-B) and 3(2); Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 28
AIR1974Bom228; 1974MhLJ319
V.R. Manohar and ;J.P. Pendse, Advs.
Chandurkar, J. 1. This is an appeal by the defendant, the New India Assurance Company Limited, Bombay, challenging a decree for Rs. 16,494.80 passed against them in favour of the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs claimed to be...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRamkrishan Ganpat Futane and ors. Vs. Mohammad Kasam and ors.
Mumbai
Aug-21-1972
Property
Evidence Act - Sections 67 and 73; Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 60(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 11, Rule 27
AIR1973Bom242; (1974)76BOMLR104; 1973MhLJ511
G.R. Mudolkar, Adv.
Chandurkar, J.1. The defendants-appellants who are the transferees from the original defendants Nos. 1 to 4 have filed this appeal challenging the judgment and decree passed by the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Amravati decreeing the suit...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKisan S/O Ramji Khandare Vs. Kausalyabai W/O Gangaram and ors.
Mumbai
Mar-12-2007
Family
Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956 - Sections 6, 8, 8(2), 11 and 12; Registration Act - Sections 16(2) and 58(1); Hindu Guardian and Wards Act - Sections 8(2) and 29; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 100 - Order 4, Rule 4 - Order 6, Rule 4; Hindu Law
2007(3)ALLMR1; 2007(3)BomCR118; 2007(4)MhLj43
B.H. Gaikwad, Adv.
V.R. Kingaonkar, J.1. The appellant herein is original defendant No. 2. The appellant is aggrieved by judgment rendered by the first appellate Court, confirming the trial Court's decree, with little modification, holding that Respondent Nos. l...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKetharaju Rajeshwari Vs. Kanthamraju Varalakshmamma and anr.
Andhra Pradesh
Jul-29-1963
Civil
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 67, 68, 70, 77 and 90; ;Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 57, 60 and 60(2)
AIR1964AP284
P.M. Gopal Rao, Adv.
Gopalrao Ekbote, J. 1. The action out of which this second appeal has arisen was laid by the 1st respondent who is the plaintiff before the District Munsif, Guntur for recovery of possession of certain lands...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »