Advanced Search Results

Vshnu Horticultural Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Shampiyan Viniyard Ltd. and ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 5, Rule 1 - Order 6, Rule 17 - Order 7, Rule 10, 10A and 10A(2) - Order 8, Rule 1

Reported in : 2010(1)BomCR328

Advocate for Appellant : A.B. Borkar, Adv.

ORDERD.B. Bhosale, J.1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties.Rule. By consent, rule made returnable forthwith. Learned Counsel appearing for the respondents waives service. By consent of the learned Counsel for the parties, the petition is taken...

State Vs. Sunil Batra Alias Bobby

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal code, 1860 - Sections 120B; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 27

Reported in : ILR1978Delhi536

Advocate for Appellant : B.L. Kalia,; R.S. Sareen and; S.P. Minocha, Advs

S. Rangarajan, J.(1) This judgment in Murder Reference No. 1of 1977 will dispose of not only Cr. Appeals No. 43/77 and 44/77 (filedby Sunil Batra), 68/77 and 123/77 (filed by VipinKumar Jaggi and Ravinder Nath Kapur,...

Rohtas Singh Vs. Commissioner, Agra Division and Others

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Contempt of Court

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 3, Rule 4 - Order 27, Rules 2 and 4; Constitution of India - Article 215; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 4 and 24; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 2; Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 35; Contempt of Courts Act, 1971

Reported in : AIR1997All278; (1997)1UPLBEC307

Advocate for Appellant : Mukesh Prasad, Adv.

ORDERB.M. Lal, J. 1. For determining the questions involved al this stage, relevant facts of these cases are as under :In Rohtas Singh's case (supra), the Commissioner Agra Division Agra and certain other officials, are alleged...

B.N. Bajpai and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Delhi Higher Judicial Service Rules, 1970 - Rule 8(2); ;All India Ordinance Factory Service Rules

Reported in : 2002IIAD(Delhi)557

Advocate for Appellant : Avnish Ahlawat and; Vaishalee Mehra, Advs

S.B. Sinha, C.J.1. In this writ petition, the petitioner has questionedthe judgment of the Central Administrative Tribunal dated21.5.1998 passed in OA No. 1882/97 wherein the Tribunal hasissued the following direction:12. In the result taking into accountthe...

Widow of Harikishan and anr. Vs. Bheek Singh and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR1952Raj58

Advocate for Appellant : Mangimal, Adv.

Kshem Chandra Gupta, J. 1. This is a miscellaneous Second Appeal in execution proceedings. The appellants had obtained a decree on the 10th of April, 1912 for Rs. 355/4/- against the respondents. The petition for its...

Bharat Bhushan and anr., Vs. Parvatiya GramIn Bank and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2008(2)ShimLC455

Deepak Gupta, J.1. These five writ petitions are being disposed of by a common judgment as they involve similar questions of fact and law.2. All the petitioners are employees of the Parvatiya Gramin Bank (hereinafter referred...

Oil and Natural Gas Commission Vs. Offshore Enterprises Inc.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 3 - Rules 2 and 4 - Order XIX - Rule 2; Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 31, 34(1) and 49; Bar Council of India Rules - Rules 9, 10 and 13; Bombay High Court Rules - Rules 9 and 13

Reported in : AIR1993Bom217; 1993(2)BomCR618; (1993)95BOMLR396; 1993(1)MhLj243

Advocate for Appellant : I.M. Chagla and ;D.J. Khambata, Advs. i/b ;B. Munim and Co. and ;G.E. Vahanvati and ;P.A. Savant, Advs. i/b ;Gagrat and Co., for ;Incorporated Law Society, ;A.P. Shah, Adv.

1. While hearing Arbitration Petition No. 210 of 1989, I found that Shri Atul Munim and Shri Pramod Dalai, Partners of Messrs. Bachubhai Munim and Co., a firm of Advocates, had filed their own affidavits as...

Kallappa Sangappa Salagatti Vs. Deputy Commissioner

Court : Karnataka

Subject : property

Acts : Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 - Sections 42; Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 - Sections 138

Reported in : 1987(1)KarLJ250

Advocate for Appellant : W.K. Joshi, Adv.

ORDERDoddakalegowda, J.1. Validity of the notification issued under Section 10(3) of Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, notice, dated 23-7-1979 calling upon petitioner to surrender possession and order dated 15-2-1974 of Special Deputy Commissioner, Dharwar,...

Nutrine Confectionary Company Ltd. Vs. Assistant Collector of Central ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944; Constitution of India - Article 226; Pure Food and Drug Act; Uttar Pradesh Sales Tax Act, 1948; Imports and Exports (Control) Act, 1947 - Sections 3(1)

Reported in : 1984(2)ECC201; 1983LC459D(AP); 1983(12)ELT736(AP)

Advocate for Appellant : P. Venkatrama Reddy, Adv.

Jagannadha Rao, J.1. This writ appeal is directed against the judgment of the learned Single Judge dismissing W.P. No. 1445/1976. 2. The appellant manufacturers and sells toffees, boiled sweets and other confectionery products. The question that...

Chonari Sulekha, W/O. C. Hamza Vs. State of Kerala Represented by the ...

Court : Kerala

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 - Sections 3, 3(1) and 13; Customs Act - Sections 108; Constitution of India - Article 22(5); Tamil Nadu Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Drug Offenders, Forest Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders and Slum Grabbers Act, 1982

Reported in : 2003(1)KLT374

Advocate for Appellant : B. Raman Pillai and; George Jacob (Jose), Advs.

Radhakrishnan, J.1. This writ of habeas corpus is preferred by thewife of C. Hamsa who is detained under Sections 3(1)(iii) and 3(1)(iv) of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange andPrevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 (for short'Cofeposa...