Advanced Search Results
Shrikrishna S. Bhagwat Vs. S.N. Soni, Commissioner of Income Tax
Mumbai
Jan-07-2004
Direct Taxation
Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 139(2), 143, 143(1), 143(3) and 273A
2004(4)BomCR157; (2004)188CTR(Bom)396; [2004]270ITR186(Bom)
S.N. Inamdar and ;G. Krishnan, Advs.
V.C. DAGA, J.1. These petitions involving a short question of law and fact were taken up for hearing together and are being disposed of by this common judgment.Background facts :2. The admitted facts giving rise to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJashan Textile Mills P. Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax and ...
Mumbai
Feb-28-2006
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 143(3), 147 and 148
(2006)205CTR(Bom)22; [2006]284ITR542(Bom)
S.N. Inamdar and ;Atul K. Jasani, Advs.
J.P. Devadhar, J.1. Heard learned Counsel for both the sides. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. By consent of parties, both these petitions are taken up for final hearing.2. In these two writ petitions, the petitioners...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSadichha Chitra Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Mumbai
Aug-23-1990
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 4
(1990)90CTR(Bom)135; [1991]189ITR774(Bom)
S.N. Inamdar, Adv.
D.R. Dhanuka J.1. This reference is made by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Bombay Bench 'B' Bombay, under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, in pursuance of an order of this court dated July 18, 1985,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Shri Chhatrapati Sahakari Kakhar Karkha ...
Mumbai
May-04-2000
Direct Taxation
(2000)163CTR(Bom)275; [2000]111TAXMAN176(Bom)
R.V. Desai and Devdhar, for the Applicant S.N. Inamdar and Pramod Vaidya, for the Respondent
Kapadia, J. The above reference No. 449 of 1995 is a reference under section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by the Tribunal, Special Bench, Pune, relating to the assessment years 1984-85 to 1988-89, at...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBhogwati Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Inco ...
Mumbai
Jan-07-2004
Direct Taxation
Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 147
(2004)188CTR(Bom)393; [2004]269ITR186(Bom)
S.N. Inamdar and ;G. Krishna, Advs.
V.C. Daga, J.1. This writ petition is directed against the notices issued under Section 147 of the IT Act, 1961 ('Act' for short), seeking to reopen assessments for the asst. yrs. 1982-83 and 1983-84. The basic...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income Tax Vs. Shirke Construction Equipments Ltd.
Mumbai
Jul-24-2000
Direct Taxation
(2000)163CTR(Bom)580; [2000]112TAXMAN311(Bom)
R.V. Desai and J.P. Deodhar, for the Revenue S.N. Inamdar, for the Assessee
Kapadia, J.Two important questions of law arise for determination in this appeal. Whether section 80AB applied to section 80HHC of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') Whether, in determination of business...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAlfa Laval India Ltd. Vs. Dy. Cit
Mumbai
Sep-17-2003
Direct Taxation
2004(2)BomCR641; [2003]133TAXMAN740(Bom)
S.N. Inamdar and P.Y. Vaidya, for the Assessee R.V. Desai and P.S. Jetly, for the Revenue
J.P. Devadhar, J.This tax appeal under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is filed by the assessee against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT for short) dated 4-1-2001 relating to the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCit Vs. B.G. Shirke and Co.
Mumbai
Dec-18-2002
Direct Taxation
[2003]127TAXMAN245(Bom)
R.V. Desai and P.S. Jetly, for the Revenue S.N. Inamdar and P.Y. Vaidya, for the Assessee
J.P. Devadhar, J.The question of law relating to assessment year 1978-79 referred to this court at the instance of the revenue, under section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, is as follows :'Whether on the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskScoop Industries (P) Ltd. and ors. Vs. Income Tax Officer and ors.
Mumbai
Oct-10-2006
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 29 to 43A, 80A(1) , 80E, 80HH, 80IA, 143(3) and 253; Finance Act, 2001
(2007)207CTR(Bom)599; [2007]289ITR195(Bom)
S.N. Inamdar and ;S.G. Bhobe, Advs.
S. Radhakrishnan, J.1. In all the above tax appeals the following two substantial questions of law have been raised which read as under:(i) Whether the Tribunal was justified in law in confirming the order of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income Tax Vs. Sudarshan Chemicals Industries Ltd
Mumbai
Aug-08-2000
Direct Taxation
[2001]112TAXMAN511(Bom)
J.P. Deodhar, R.V. Desai and T.C. Kaushik, for the Revenue S.N. Inamdar and Pramod Vaidya, for the Assessee
Kapadia, J.All the above appeals deal with common question of law and facts and, therefore, they are decided together by this judgment. For the sake of convenience, however, facts in Income-tax Appeal No. 120 of 2000...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »