Advanced Search Results

Ram Sagar Shukla Vs. U.P. Textile Printing Corporation Ltd.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 16; Bar Council of India Rules; Allahabad High Courts Rules, 1952 - Rules 3, 5 and 7

Reported in : AIR2004All209

Advocate for Appellant : K.P. Agrawal, ;B.C. Tripathi and ;Hari Om Khare, Advs.

R. B. Misra, J.1. It appears that the Writ Petition No. 7937 of 1985. Ram Sagar Shukla v. U.P. Textile Printing Corporation Ltd. Khalilabad, Basti and Ors., was dismissed in default on 16.7.2003 and restoration application...

Brij Lal Patel Vs. U.P. State Agro Industrial Corporation and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 16 and 49(1); Bar Council of India Rules, 1975

Reported in : AIR2004All178

Advocate for Appellant : K.P. Agarwal and ;Arvind Kumar, Advs.

ORDERR.B. Misra, J.1. Writ Petition No. 28709 of 1993 Brij Lal Patel v. U.P. State Agro Industrial Corporation and another was dismissed in default by an order dated 24-7-2003 which reads as below :'Sri Arvind Kumar...

Lt. Col. (Retd.) Ashok Kumar Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Contempt of Court

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 123; Constitution of India - Article 77(3); Transaction of Business Rules, 1961 - Rule 3; Constitution (Forty-forth Amendment), 1978 - Sections 12; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 27 and 39

Reported in : 1997CriLJ2688

Advocate for Appellant : Party in person

ORDER1. This order or judgment would not be complete and is only an appendix to the order of the Court dated 26 May 1990, which was a repercussion to the framing of the charges against the...

Suraj NaraIn Srivastava Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226; Administrative Law; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 241

Reported in : AIR2003All259

Advocate for Appellant : Party in person

Vishnu Sahai, J. 1. This writ petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been preferred in person by Suraj Narain Srivastava, an Advocate practising in this Court over a decade, under the caption...

Smt. Usha Pandey Vs. A.C.J.M. Ii and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 125, 340 and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 228

Reported in : 2001CriLJ2836

Advocate for Appellant : Party-in-person

ORDER1. Heard the applicant. Km. Abha Pandey, in person, Sri V. B. Upadhyaya, learned Senior Advocate whom we requested to assist us as amicus curiage and also the learned Government Counsel.2. This Habeas Corpus petition has...

K.S. Iyer Vs. Bar Council Represented by Its Secretary, H.C. Madras

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Legal Practitioners Act, 1879 - Sections 6 and 7; Bar Councils Act, 1926 - Sections 24; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 19(1); Bar Councils Rules - Rule 1VB

Reported in : AIR1964Mad390

Advocate for Appellant : Party in Person

S. Ramachandra Iyer, C.J.1. This is; an appeal from the judgment of Veeraswami J. refusing to issue a writ of certiorari prayed for by the appellant to have the order of the Slate Bar Council, Madras,...

Amrit Varsha Hindi Dainik Vs. Bihar State Agriculture Marketing Board ...

Court : Patna

Subject : Property

Acts : Bihar Govt. Premises (Rent Recovery and Eviction) Act, 1956 - Sections 4; Constitution of India - Article 12; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 144

Advocate for Appellant : S.B. Upadhyay, Naresh Dixit and Brij Bihari Tiwary, Advs. in LPA No. 556/1999, Ram Janma Ojha, Sr. Adv., K.P. Yadav, L.K. Bajla, Bijay Kumar Pandey, Mukesh Kumar No. 2, Praveen Kumar Sinha, Suresh Ku

B.P. Singh, J. 1. These two Letters Patent Appeals arise out of the common judgment and order of a learned Judge of this Court dated 16th October. 1998 in Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 5918 of...

Surinder Kaur and Others Vs. Sardar Rajdev Singh and Others

Court : Delhi

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 151 - Order XXXII, Rule 3

Reported in : 2000VAD(Delhi)545; AIR2000Delhi306; 85(2000)DLT527; 2000(54)DRJ117

Advocate for Appellant : Dr. A.M. Singhvi and; Mr. V.K. Makhija, Senior Advs.,; Mr.

ORDERManmohan Sarin, J.1. By this order, I would be disposing of is No. 7974/99 moved by the plaintiffs under Order XXXII, Rule 3 read with Section 151 CPC. The plaintiffs pray that a medical board be...

L. Ponnayal @ Lakshmi Vs. Karuppannan Dead Through Lr. Sengoda Gounder ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Petitioner-In-Person

NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal Nos.9558-9559 of 2018 (Arising out of Special Leave Petitions (C) Nos.9811-12 of 2017) L. Ponnayal @ Lakshmi …… APPELLANT (S) Versus Karuppannan (Dead) Thr....

Municipal Committee Amritsar and ors. Vs. the State of Punjab Through ... Overruled

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 31, 31(2), 31A, 31A(1) and 246; Punjab Local Authorities (Aided Schools) Act, 1959 - Sections 3, 3(2), 4, 5 and 6; Punjab Municipal Act, 1911; Punjab District Boards Act, 1883

Reported in : AIR1966P&H232

Advocate for Appellant : S.T. Desai,; P.D. Mody,; H.L. Sibal and;

P.C. Pandit, J.1. This judgment will dispose of two connected writ petitions (Civil Writ No 878 of 1964 (Municipal Committee, Amritsar v. State of Punjab) and Civil Writ No 2173 of 1964 (Municipal Committee Karnal v....